Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Recognising Foreign Proceedings under Singapore's Restructuring and Insolvency Regime: Court of Appeal Clarifies Whether Company Must be Insolvent
    2023-11-08

    Introduction

    Restructuring and insolvency proceedings often span different jurisdictions, requiring the cooperation of the respective countries' insolvency regimes. In its role as an international hub for restructuring and insolvency, Singapore has in place a framework for the effective management of cross-border insolvency proceedings. This takes the form of the UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, which has been enacted in Singapore in an adapted form ("SG Model Law").

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Sim Kwan Kiat , Sheila Ng , Walter Yeo
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia
    The Supreme Court provides welcome clarity for insolvency practitioners in relation to personal liability for failure to comply with redundancy notification requirements
    2023-11-03

    The Supreme Court has provided welcome clarity for insolvency practitioners in confirming that administrators of a company appointed pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986 ("IA 1986") will not be criminally liable for a failure by the company to comply with redundancy notification requirements.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Travers Smith LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Edward Smith , Melissa Atkinson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Travers Smith LLP
    Due diligence of resolution applicants by resolution professionals: Mere reliance on an affidavit is not enough to check ineligibility under Section 29A of the IBC
    2023-11-03

    In an application filed by Vishram Narayan Panchpor, resolution professional of Blue Frog Media Private Limited (“Corporate Debtor”) in the matter of M/s Blue Frog Media Private Limited1 for approval of a resolution plan, the Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT Mumbai”) ruled that the object of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“IBC”) requires a resolution professional to conduct adequate due diligence on a prospective resolution applicant and its related parti

    Filed under:
    India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, Due diligence, Insolvency, Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (India), National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Aashit Shah , Aayush Suneja , Adrika Bisen
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Supreme Court Decision: Administrator Not an Officer of Company
    2023-11-02

    If an employer intends to make 20 or more employees redundant, at one establishment, within a 90-day period, they must notify the Secretary of State at least 30 days before the first dismissal, as per Section 193(2) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (“TULRCA”). Failure to adhere to this requirement is a criminal offence. This legislation has been of great concern to insolvency practitioners who are often dealing with companies in a precarious position and do not have the luxury of time to comply with Section 193(2) TULRCA.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wedlake Bell, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Adam Grant
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Wedlake Bell
    Pre-Packed Schemes of Arrangement: the Singapore Approach
    2023-11-02

    In 2018, Singapore enacted the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (IRDA 2018), which streamlined its debt restructuring regime by consolidating provisions previously set out in various statutes into a piece of omnibus legislation.

    Among other developments, the IRDA 2018 built upon existing provisions relating to pre-packed schemes of arrangement (i.e. pre-packed schemes) and enhanced pre-packed schemes as a viable tool in Singapore’s arsenal of debt restructuring mechanisms.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, CMS Holborn Asia, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Daniel Tan
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    CMS Holborn Asia
    Funding Post an Insolvency Event
    2023-11-02

    Is a court order necessary for security interests granted after the appointment of external administrators? Perhaps not.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Litigation Capital Management, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Siba Diqer
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Litigation Capital Management
    Luxembourg Modernises Its Insolvency Legislation
    2023-11-02

    On 19 July 2023, the parliament of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Luxembourg) passed bill no. 6539A into law (the New Insolvency Law), marking a significant milestone in the movement to modernise and enhance the competitiveness of Luxembourg’s insolvency framework. The bill has been under discussion for a number of years and aims to curtail the use of bankruptcy as an insolvency solution in favour of the preemptive preservation or reorganisation of financially distressed companies.

    Filed under:
    Luxembourg, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, K&L Gates LLP, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Dr. Jan Boeing , Geoffrey Delamarre , Tanner J. Wonnacott
    Location:
    Luxembourg
    Firm:
    K&L Gates LLP
    Court Makes Rare Compensation Order Against Director
    2023-11-01

    Amendments to the director disqualification regime, enacted in 2015, enable the Insolvency Service (on the request of a creditor of an insolvent company) to seek a compensatory remedy against a disqualified director for the benefit of the creditor(s). This empowers a creditor to take action where an insolvency officer may be unable, or unwilling, to do so.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mishcon de Reya LLP, Insolvency, Insolvency Service (UK)
    Authors:
    David Leibowitz , Laura Edwards , Nick Payne
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mishcon de Reya LLP
    The UK’s latest quarterly insolvency statistics- no end in sight for rising insolvencies hitting the highest levels since 2009 and in some cases 1960
    2023-11-01

    High rates of insolvencies look set to continue as the latest quarterly insolvency statistics have been published for England and Wales. Whilst the statistics show a 2% dip from the second quarter of 2023, the number of insolvencies remains 10% higher than in 2022 and shows a return to pre-pandemic levels for compulsory liquidations and administrations. It is particularly striking that the first two quarters of 2023 represent the highest quarterly insolvencies since Q2 2009.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Insolvency, Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act 2020
    Authors:
    Katharina Crinson , Craig Montgomery , Chloe Ball
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Whether the limitation to file an appeal under IBC will commence on the date of pronouncement of order or from the date when contents are known to the aggrieved party?
    2023-11-01

    The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (New Delhi Bench) (“NCLAT”) in two recent judgments passed in Raiyan Hotels and Resorts Pvt. Ltd. vs. Unrivalled Projects Pvt. Ltd. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1071 of 2023] and Aryan Mining & Trading Corpn Pvt. Ltd. vs Kail limited and Anr. [Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No.

    Filed under:
    India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Singhania & Partners LLP, Insolvency, Supreme Court of India, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Abhishek Kumar
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    Singhania & Partners LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Current page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • Page 38
    • Page 39
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days