Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    European perspective in brief
    2012-10-01

    Europe has struggled mightily during the last several years to triage a long series of critical blows to the economies of the 27 countries that comprise the European Union as well as the collective viability of euro-zone economies. Here we provide a snapshot of some recent developments relating to insolvency and restructuring in the EU.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, The Pensions Regulator (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Enterprise Act 2002 (UK)
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Administrative receivership abolished for overseas incorporated companies
    2010-10-18

    Summary and implications

    Almost exactly one year on from the Order* coming into force, many people remain unaware that it is no longer possible to appoint an administrative receiver over an overseas incorporated company.

    Lenders and indeed insolvency practitioners should be aware that this is the case even when dealing with qualifying floating charges created before 15 September 2003 but alternative strategies, including administration, may be pursued to the same effect.

    Administrative receivership

    Filed under:
    European Union, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Nabarro LLP, Discrimination, Commodity, Default (finance), European Commission, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Enterprise Act 2002 (UK)
    Authors:
    Habib Ullah
    Location:
    European Union
    Firm:
    Nabarro LLP
    Beschäftigungsanspruch von schwerbehinderten hat grenzen
    2019-07-05

    Schwerbehinderte haben das gesetzlich verbriefte Recht, dass ihr Arbeitsverhältnis entsprechend ihrer gesundheitlichen Situation durchgeführt wird. Dieser Anspruch besteht aber nur insoweit, als dies für den Arbeitgeber zumutbar ist. Eine Beschäftigungsgarantie ergibt sich hieraus jedoch gerade nicht.

    Sachverhalt

    Filed under:
    Germany, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Advant Beiten, Bankruptcy, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Dr. Sarah Reinhardt-Kasperek
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Advant Beiten
    New rules on directors’ liability in Germany
    2018-11-08

    The German Federal Court of Justice has tightened its grip on company directors again. In a recent judgment on directors’ liability in insolvency situations, the Court clarified the scope of sections 60- 61 of the German Insolvency Act.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Debtor in possession, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Federal Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Dr. Daniel Kunz , Leopold Bauer
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Recognition and enforcement of cross-border insolvency: Nigeria in perspective
    2019-02-15

    One of the challenges currently faced with Nigeria’s standing in relation to international trade is the adequacy of the country’s insolvency laws and regulations on cross-border insolvency. Trade has taken an international dimension over the decades, a corporation in one country will have interests – goods, assets, employees and claims in other countries. During the life of a company and as it continues to trade, there is the likelihood for the company to fail such that its liabilities far exceed its assets and it goes insolvent.

    Filed under:
    Nigeria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Bloomfield LP, UNCITRAL, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Adedoyin Afun , Chukwudi Ofili
    Location:
    Nigeria
    Firm:
    Bloomfield LP
    Court may grant retrospective sanction for liquidator to act
    2010-07-06

    Introduction

    When a company enters liquidation, the appointed liquidator often needs approval from the Court or a liquidation committee before she can perform certain acts on the company’s behalf. The English High Court case of Gresham International Ltd v Moonie [2009] EWHC 1093 (Ch) established that even where the liquidator has failed to obtain such approval before acting, the Court has the general discretion to grant retrospective approval.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rajah & Tann Asia, Debtor, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Companies Act, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Sim Kwan Kiat
    Location:
    Singapore, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Rajah & Tann Asia
    Some clarity on what constitutes a “class” of creditors in a section 155 compromise
    2018-06-06

    The Gauteng Division of the High Court recently delivered a judgment in the matter of The Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service and Logikal Consulting (Pty) Ltd and Others, Case No. 96768/2016, in which the court had to interpret, among other things, what comprises a “class” of creditors as contemplated in s155(2) of the Companies Act, No 71 of 2008.

    Filed under:
    South Africa, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr, South African Revenue Service, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Kgosi Nkaiseng , Lebohang Khoanyane
    Location:
    South Africa
    Firm:
    Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr
    Rescuing dead horses
    2017-08-08

    What can the UK and South Africa learn from each other by comparing the business rescue regime with administration?

    South Africa’s relatively recent business rescue regime (introduced in 2011) has exploded into a popular process for “affected persons” facing a company in financial distress. It shares some aspects with the administration procedure in England and Wales (UK). Lessons can be drawn from both the similarities and the differences between the two procedures that may benefit restructuring and insolvency practitioners both in the UK and South Africa.

    Filed under:
    South Africa, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Philip Povey , Fergus Kent
    Location:
    South Africa, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Rescuing Dead Horses: what can the UK and South Africa learn from each other by comparing the Business Rescue regime with Administration procedures
    2017-10-31

    Dead Horses

    When is a dead horse really a dead horse? Given that ‘insolvency’ opens the door to various procedures for creditors and others, it should (in theory) be fairly easy to define. In practice, however, it is not.

    Filed under:
    South Africa, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hogan Lovells, Unsecured debt, Companies Act, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Philip Povey , Fergus Kent
    Location:
    South Africa, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    The CCAA scene: recent and notable
    2009-02-05

    On January 14, 2009, Nortel Networks Corporation obtained protection from its creditors under theCompanies' Creditors Arrangement Act. From a historical perspective, it represents a Canadian icon's fall from grace. It was once an industry heavyweight - at its height its market cap was $250 billion and accounted for two thirds of the total value of the Toronto Stock Exchange. As North America's largest maker of telephone equipment (and now into its 113th year), its problems were compounded by the global financial crisis and North American recession as well as by global competition.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Market capitalisation, Debtor, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Subsidiary, Toronto Stock Exchange, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Current page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days