The Carluccio’s judgment provides some much-needed clarity on the interrelation of the Furlough Scheme and the requirements of insolvency legislation. It is to be commended for its clarity and for the fact that it had to construe the workings of the Furlough Scheme in the absence of any statutory guidance as to its implementation. It is to be hoped that, when the Government comes to enact the necessary legislative measures (including perhaps amendments to Schedule B1 and IR 2016), that it does so with this judgment very firmly in mind.

In Hunt (as Liquidator of System Building Services Group Ltd) v Michie & Ors [2020] EWHC 54 (Ch), ICC Judge Barber has confirmed that directors of insolvent companies remain subject to fiduciary duties, even after those companies enter into an insolvency procedure.

Background

In light of the financially fragile state some businesses are finding themselves in as result of COVID-19, we discuss in this briefing note when – if ever – payments or other benefits can be given to some creditors but not others, and when such a transaction might fall foul of the unlawful preference provisions of UK insolvency legislation.

The Coronavirus Act 2020 is now in force and Section 82 of that Act effecting the postponement of the landlord’s right to forfeit for non-payment of rent is causing consternation amongst both landlords and tenants as they seek to navigate through these uncertain times.

Given the material impact that coronavirus is having on businesses, on March 28, 2020 the government announced that legislation would be forthcoming amending UK insolvency laws to:

On 28 March 2020 the Secretary of State for BEIS, Alok Sharma, announced that changes would be made to the UK insolvency laws to help companies "…emerge intact the other side of the COVID-19 pandemic…to give them extra time and space to weather the storm and be ready when the crisis ends whilst ensuring creditors get the best returns possible in the circumstances".

The UK Parliament made an Order on 3 March 2020 which increases the prescribed part, payable to unsecured creditors from floating charge recoveries on the insolvency of a company from £600,000 to £800,000.

Back in August 2018, in its paper entitled “Government Response: Insolvency and Corporate Governance” (the 2018Paper) the Government responded to its consultation on ‘Insolvency and Corporate Governance‘ with the announcement of several reforms and proposed next steps.

A recent English case has considered for the first time whether and if so to what extent the general duties of a director survive a company’s entry into an insolvency process.

Following on from our blog: Does e-filing give you a headache? Does the recent guidance issued by the Chancellor help ease the pain?

Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: In Re C A & T Developments Ltd, the court found that the appointment of administrators had been motivated by an improper purpose and the purpose of the administration could not be achieved. In an application under Paragraph 81 of Schedule B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 (IA 1986), the court therefore ordered the administration to end and the company to be wound up compulsorily.