It begins with an awkward mouthful. Outside a bankruptcy brief, is “unimpairment” even a word? (No, per Merriam-Webster.) Inside Chapter 11, it’s much more: a trend.
Want to refinance your bonds cheaply? Are you an otherwise sound and solvent business, forced into bankruptcy by a massive fire (PG&E), persistent low commodity pricing (Ultra Petroleum), or a pandemic (Hertz, whose airport rental business was shuttered in 2020 by COVID-19)?
Or would you just prefer to boost your stock value by lowering your coupon?
Francis Tregear QC was instructed to act as an expert in English law for the successful party (“JPA”) in a dispute heard by Hon. David S Jones a judge in the Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York.
The case turned on English law relating to mortgages and equitable principles which are applicable to mortgages. The relevant English law fell to be applied in the context of aircraft finance for the purchase of two Airbus 350-941 aircraft.
Superpark Oy v Superpark Asia Group Pte Ltd and others[2021] SGCA 8
The Financial Conduct Authority v Carillion Plc[2021] EWHC 2871 (Ch)
The Respondent company was put into compulsory liquidation on 15 January 2018 and the Official Receiver was appointed as the liquidator.
Section 130(2) of the UK Insolvency Act (which is in the same wordings as section 186 of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap 32)) provides that:
Silver Starlight Limited v China CITIC Bank Corporation Limited, Tianjin Branch &Others[2021] HKCA 1248
Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd.[2021] HKCFA 14
The Company and Build King Construction Limited (“Build King”) entered into a joint venture agreement (the “JV Agreement”) in November 2013 to form and operate a joint venture (the “JV”). The JV was subsequently awarded a government contract for a major project in June 2016 with the Company taking a 65% interest and Build King the remaining 35%.
Stanford International Bank Ltd (in liquidation) v HSBC Bank PLC[2021] EWCA Civ 535
Stanford International Bank Limited (“SIB”), which collapsed into liquidation in 2009, held multiple accounts with HSBC between 2003 to 2009 (“Accounts”). SIB had debts in excess of US$5 billion arising from its being used as the vehicle for one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history. The liquidators of SIB (“Liquidators”) made two claims against HSBC as follows:
Ho Man Kit And Another v Lo Siu Chu Judy And Another[2022] HKCFI 133
The Plaintiffs in this case were the joint and several trustees of Li Bao Tian (“B”), who was adjudged bankrupt on 7 December 2016. The 1st and the 2nd Defendants (collectively, “Defendants”) are mother and son. B was in an intimate relationship with the 1st Defendant, albeit whilst legally married to another woman and is the father of the 2nd Defendant.
Lee Siu Fung Siegfried[2021] 5 HKLRD 627
In January 2001, a bankruptcy petition was presented against Mr. Lee Siu Fung Siegfried in respect of a HK$322 million debt arising out of a guarantee given by him. In or around September 2016, the trustees in bankruptcy obtained an order for the private examination of Mr. Lee and the Applicants, who are the younger brother and son of Mr. Lee.
Introduction: