Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New Company Restructuring Act welcomed by many
    2023-02-10

    Introduction
    Lower threshold for petitioning company restructuring procedure
    Ipso facto clauses are invalid
    Provision on enforcement of share pledge

    Filed under:
    Sweden, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wigge & Partners
    Authors:
    Klara Larsson , Andreas Malmberg , Jonathan Riddersholm
    Location:
    Sweden
    Firm:
    Wigge & Partners
    Bad ‘Timing’: Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court Adopts Time Approach to Limiting Landlord Lease Damages, but Other Damages May Still Be Allowable
    2023-02-10

    Overview

    When enacting the Bankruptcy Code, Congress sought to strike a balance amid the confluence of different — and often competing — interests held by debtors, secured creditors and various unsecured creditor constituencies (including landlords) through a framework of statutory protections. This has – at times – led to litigation over differing statutory interpretations as well as circuit splits as courts attempt to reconcile underlying policy goals with the less-than-clear language in various of the Code’s provisions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Adam C. Rogoff , Ashland J. Bernard
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Third Circuit dismisses talc bankruptcy
    2023-02-10

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Authors:
    Gregory G. Hesse , Brandon Bell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Metro Paving and Roadbuilding Ltd
    2023-02-10

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    Canada, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Government of Canada
    Authors:
    Gregor Allan
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    How to manage distress in UK construction supply chains
    2023-02-10

    Spotting the warning signs of distress in your construction supply chain and taking early action can significantly reduce the impact on your projects

    While insolvency events may appear to arise suddenly, there are often warning signs or "red flags" of distress well in advance. While these do not necessarily demonstrate actual insolvency, they can indicate liquidity and solvency risks to the supply chain.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Projects & Procurement, Osborne Clarke, Supply chain, Insolvency
    Authors:
    Sam Furse , Tom Andrews , Tessa Garner
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Osborne Clarke
    医药BD项目如何友好“分手”?
    2023-02-10

    在《商法》2022年11月刊首发。

    医药BD(business development,商务拓展)项目通常指通过授权许可、投资、并购、合作开发/商业化等方式进行产品和技术的商业机会拓展。全球新冠疫情已逾三年,医药行业的市场环境和商业预期亦深受影响,导致医药BD项目面临不同程度的挑战。

    折射到法律和履约层面,不可抗力、情势变更与市场变化等因素也逐渐变成医药企业内部会议或与合作伙伴商讨如何继续开展项目时高频出现的词汇。是继续“厮守”,还是友好“分手”,往往成为不可回避的话题。

    一、妥善约定退出机制

    协议是项目开展的基础,项目因各种原因难以为继而需要终止时,退出机制的设计就成为关键。通道不清、权责不明的终止或解除条款将导致企业退出困难,且通常伴随着高昂的时间与经济成本。

    协议的终止/解除可分为法定终止/解除与意定终止/解除的两种情形。

    在中国法下,常见法定终止情形包括不可抗力与情势变更,两种情形都具有不可预见性,在双方意见不一时,需由法院或仲裁机构决定适用。相对而言,意定终止基于双方事前合意,意见较易统一,可预见性更强。居安思危,事前规划退出机制,明确双方对于合作终止情形的预期,也是对项目负责的表现。

    Filed under:
    China, Insolvency & Restructuring, Han Kun Law Offices, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Yang (Aaron) Gu , Zhu Min
    Location:
    China
    Firm:
    Han Kun Law Offices
    English court decision provides helpful clarity to insolvency practitioners appointed over energy companies, as well as their creditors
    2023-02-10

    Background
    Decision
    Key takeaways

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Kirsten Fulton-Fleming
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Ding Dong - Set-Off is Gone: Absolutely Set-Off is Definitely No Longer Available as a Defence to an Unfair Preference Claim: Decision Update
    2023-02-09

    The High Court of Australia in Metal Manufactures Pty Limited v Morton [2023] HCA 1 has confirmed the view of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia that the "set off" defence under section 553C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) is no longer available to claims by liquidators for an unfair preference claim made under section 588FA of the Act.

    This decision brings finality to claims brought by Creditor Defendants to such claims and no doubt brings much joy to liquidators across Australia.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, K&L Gates LLP, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Ian J. Dorey , Cameron Adair
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    K&L Gates LLP
    Third Circuit Dismisses J&J Affiliate LTL’s Talc Liability Chapter 11 Filing; “Good Faith” Under 1112(b) Requires Financial Distress
    2023-02-09

    Executive Summary:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Good faith, Third Circuit, U.S. Court of Appeals
    Authors:
    Ingrid Bagby , Michele C. Maman , Casey Servais
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    The good, the bad, the ugly: crucial judgements for liquidators relating to unfair preferences
    2023-02-09

    The High Court has handed down its long-awaited decisions in Bryant v Badenoch Integrated Logging Pty Ltd [2023] (Badenoch) HCA 2 and Metal Manufactures Pty Ltd v Morton [2023] HCA 1 (Morton) providing guidance on common defences to unfair preference claims that may be brought by liquidators. The key takeaways for insolvency practitioners are:

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maddocks, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Cara Thompson , Mathew Gashi , Michael Wells
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Maddocks

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 317
    • Page 318
    • Page 319
    • Page 320
    • Current page 321
    • Page 322
    • Page 323
    • Page 324
    • Page 325
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days