Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    An In-Court Dispute Over Mediation Confidentiality (In re Barrets Minerals)
    2024-04-16

    You don’t see this very often: a dispute over the confidentiality of mediation communications.

    But such a dispute recently happened in In re Barretts Minerals, Inc., Case No. 23-90794, Southern Texas Bankruptcy Court. And the result is this: mediation confidentiality remains alive and well.

    In re Barretts Minerals is a mass-tort asbestos case. And Debtor is pursuing confirmation of a bankruptcy plan under § 524(6). Mediation efforts are in progress.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, Mediation, Pfizer
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Totgesagte leben länger! Mit dem StaRUG zur neuen deutschen Sanierungskultur
    2024-04-16

    Als Teil des Gesetzespakets zur Fortentwicklung des Sanierungs- und Insolvenzrechts und in Umsetzung der Richtlinie (EU) 2019/1023 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 20.06.2019 über präventive Restrukturierungsrahmen trat am 1. Januar 2021 das Unternehmensstabilisierungs- und restrukturierungsgesetz („StaRUG“) in Kraft. An das Gesetz hatte der Markt hohe Erwartungen geknüpft: endlich stand nun auch in Deutschland ein vorinsolvenzliches Sanierungsverfahren zur Verfügung, das mit den Verfahren anderer Staaten wie z.B.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Insolvency & Restructuring, Deloitte Legal
    Authors:
    Frank Tschentscher
    Location:
    Germany
    Firm:
    Deloitte Legal
    Referencias Jurídicas | Abril 2024
    2024-04-16

    La Dirección General de Seguridad Jurídica y Fe Pública ha resuelto, en Resolución de 19 de febrero de 2024, que una sociedad concursada, en fase de liquidación, no puede nombrar un administrador único. La DGSJyFP excluye, implícitamente, que subsista cualquier rango de funciones representativas que no se vea afectada por el concurso, a pesar de lo generalmente defendido por la doctrina.

    Referencias Jurídicas CMS

    Abril 2024

    Posts Jurídicos

    Corporate / M&A

    Filed under:
    Spain, Arbitration & ADR, Banking, Company & Commercial, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Public, CMS Albiñana & Suárez de Lezo
    Location:
    Spain
    Firm:
    CMS Albiñana & Suárez de Lezo
    Creditors of a Belgian company facing insolvency: Take prompt action
    2024-04-17

    The Belgian economy remains vulnerable to the insolvency of significant industrial entities. All creditors - suppliers, customers, contractors alike - should act swiftly to ascertain their position vis-à-vis the bankruptcy estate. It's vital to take proactive steps:

    • Can I rely on a retention of title to reclaim my goods?
    • Will my pending orders still be delivered?
    • Is my contract terminated?
    • Should I submit a claim in the estate?
    Filed under:
    Belgium, Insolvency & Restructuring, Lydian
    Authors:
    Yves Lenders , Kim Van Zummeren
    Location:
    Belgium
    Firm:
    Lydian
    NCLAT: Adjudicating Authority can extend payment timelines in a resolution plan without the concurrence of the CoC
    2024-04-17

    In the recent decision of Ashok Dattatray Atre & Ors. v. State Bank of India & Ors.1 National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) has reiterated that the extension of payment timelines under a resolution plan does not constitute a modification thereof, and the National Company Law Tribunal has the power to grant such extension even without the express concurrence of the committee of creditors (“CoC”).

    Brief Facts

    Filed under:
    India, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, JSA, National Company Law Tribunal
    Authors:
    Dheeraj Nair , Vishrutyi Sahni
    Location:
    India
    Firm:
    JSA
    Statutory Powers of Sale
    2024-04-17

    In 2023, we saw an increase in both voluntary administration and receivership appointments in Australia. In the context of Australia's economic climate this was unsurprising — debtor companies were grappling with volatile markets, supply chain disruptions and uncertain economic conditions, and secured lenders were invoking either or both of these regimes as a means of protecting their investments.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Supply chain, Insolvency, Receivership, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Timothy Sackar , Jillian McAleese , Ashleigh Tang , Sam Rowling
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Budget 2024 extends debt forgiveness rules to bankrupt corporations
    2024-04-17

    On April 16, 2024, Canada’s Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, Chrystia Freeland, delivered the Liberal Government’s federal budget, Fairness for Every Generation (Budget 2024). The most notable tax measure in Budget 2024 is the proposal to increase the capital gains inclusion rate from one-half to two-thirds, for capital gains realized on or after June 25, 2024. This measure will apply to all capital gains realized by corporations and trusts, but only will apply to individuals in respect of the portion of capital gains realized in the year that exceeds $250,000.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Authors:
    Jeremy Ho , Kathryn Walker
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Credit Bids on the rise in Australia
    2024-04-17

    Investors in the Australian market are more sophisticated than ever and – unsurprisingly – so too are the restructuring transactions being promoted by these investors. One such transaction is the credit bid. While not a transaction structure that is formally recognised in Australia, a credit bid is a valuable tool in a financier's playbook that can be implemented to achieve a return where the original financing is unable to be repaid in accordance with its terms.

    Credit Bidding

    Filed under:
    Australia, Banking, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, White & Case, Foreign direct investment, Due diligence, Insolvency, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Foreign Investment Review Board, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Timothy Sackar , Jillian McAleese , Ashleigh Tang , Marcus Carlei
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    White & Case
    New York’s Renewed Efforts to Pass Sovereign Debt Legislation (US)
    2024-04-17

    As discussed in our prior blog entitled “New York’s Sovereign Debt Restructuring Proposals,”[1] three bills were introduced in the New York state legislature to overhaul the way sovereign debt restructurings are handled in New York. Those bills sought to implement a comprehensive mechanism for restructuring sovereign debt, limit recovery on certain sovereign debt claims, and amend the champerty defense.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Squire Patton Boggs, US Senate
    Authors:
    Jeffrey N. Rothleder , Tara Peramatukorn
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Navigating Chapter 11 Restructurings in Australia: How Important is Recognition?
    2024-04-17

    In today's globalised economy, local recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings can be essential for the successful implementation of cross-border restructurings. This is particularly relevant in Australia — a popular host for foreign investment and global corporate groups with local assets.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, White & Case, Insolvency, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Singapore High Court
    Authors:
    Timothy Sackar , Jillian McAleese , Sophie Lyall , Jonny Stuchbery
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    White & Case

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 220
    • Page 221
    • Page 222
    • Page 223
    • Current page 224
    • Page 225
    • Page 226
    • Page 227
    • Page 228
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days