Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Dividends liable to challenge as transactions defrauding creditors?
    2016-08-25

    In the recent case of BTI 2014 LLC v Sequana SA & others [2016] EWHC 1686, the High Court has held for the first time that a dividend can be challenged as a transaction entered into at an undervalue within the meaning of section 423(1) of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “IA”).

    The Facts

    The facts of the case are long and complex but for present purposes the pertinent facts are as follows.

    Arjo Wiggins Appleton Limited (now Windward Prospects Limited) (“AWA”) was a wholly owned subsidiary of Sequana SA (“SSA”).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Shareholder, Debtor, Fraud, Dividends, Board of directors, Interest, Consideration, Debt, Good faith, Subsidiary, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Cathryn Williams , Jonathan Dunkley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Lawbite: break notices - Limited Partnership causes unlimited problems
    2016-08-02

    Vanquish Properties (UK) Ltd Partnership v Brook Street (UK) Ltd [2016] EWHC 1508 (Ch)

    Vanquish, a developer, was a Limited Partnership under the Limited Partnerships Act 1907 with one General Partner, liable for all obligations of the business, and four Limited Partners.

    It was granted an overriding lease by the City Corporation in the name of the Limited Partnership, “acting by” its General Partner. There was no mention of the four Limited Partners.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP, Legal personality, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Solicitor, Limited partnership, Dispute resolution, Prejudice, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Richard New
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP
    Court decides to ‘wait and see’ in its refusal to grant an administration order
    2016-08-03

    Rowntree Ventures Ltd v Oak Property Partners Ltd [2016] EWHC 1523 (Ch)

    Executive Summary

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debt, Liquidation, Balance sheet, Cashflow, Precondition, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Colin Cochrane
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Insolvency Service Fees Overhaul - Good News or Bad?
    2016-07-26

    A new fee structure in respect of insolvency fees payable to the Insolvency Service came into force on 21 July 2016, pursuant to The Insolvency Proceedings (Fees) Order 2016 (SI 2016/692) (the “Order”), which revokes The Insolvency Proceedings (Fees) Order 2004 (SI 2004/593) and all ten subsequent amendment orders.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Gemma Whale , Devinder Singh
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Documenting responsibility for contributing to DB schemes
    2016-07-20

    The Court of Appeal’s decision in the case of Heis v MF Global highlights the importance of documenting just who has responsibility for contributing to a defined benefit pension scheme.

    EIS AND OTHERS V MF GLOBAL UK SERVICES LTD (IN ADMINISTRATION) [2016] EWCA CIV 569, [2016] ALL ER (D) 125 (JUN)

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, Contractual term, Debt, Broker-dealer, Defined benefit pension plan, The Pensions Regulator (UK), MFG.com, Pension Protection Fund, Pensions Act 1995 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Mark Howard
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    Marme Inversiones 2007 S.L. v The Royal Bank of Scotland et al [2016] EWHC 1570 (Comm)
    2016-07-08

    The UK Commercial Court has dismissed the Claimant's application for a stay under Article 28 of the Judgments Regulation.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Commercial property, Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Cashflow, Default (finance), Exclusive jurisdiction, Stay of execution, The Royal Bank of Scotland, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Emma Clayton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Trustees in Bankruptcy should beware the pitfalls of ignoring legal professional privilege
    2016-07-14

    Shlosberg v Avonwick Holdings Ltd & Ors [2016] EWHC 1001

    Law firm Dechert LLP has been ordered to cease acting for the principal creditor of bankrupt Russian businessman, Mr Shlosberg, because it also acted for the trustees in bankruptcy, and accordingly had had access to documents subject to Mr Shlosberg's legal professional privilege.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, DAC Beachcroft, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Waiver, Discovery, Solicitor, Liquidation, Conspiracy (criminal), Vesting, Legal professional privilege, European Convention on Human Rights, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Trustee, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Ross Risby , Megan Dickinson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DAC Beachcroft
    Guidance on Income Payment Orders: pensions and medical insurance
    2016-06-01

    FACTS:

    InHinton v Wotherspoon [2016] EWHC 623 (CH), Jason Freedman and Aziz Abdul successfully secured an Income Payments Order (“IPO”) on behalf of the Trustee in Bankruptcy.

    The court also provided useful guidance on the correct position where a bankrupt has made an election to draw down from his private pension but not given specific instructions as to application of the funds.

    LEGAL BACKGROUND:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys, Bankruptcy, Initial public offerings, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Aziz Abdul
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Litigation Funding Cements England’s Insolvency Litigation Hub Status
    2016-06-07

    Much like the English Scheme of Arrangement which has become a popular debt restructuring solution for international debtors, the English High Court is an attractive forum for insolvency litigation thanks to the potent combination of wide-ranging powers available to Insolvency Practitioners (IPs) under the Insolvency Act 1986, and the increasing availability of litigation funding arrangements in the London market.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Debtor, Debt restructuring, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Simon J. Bushell
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    COD Hyde Ltd v Space Change Management Ltd [2016] EWHC 820 (Ch)
    2016-05-13

    Here the court refused to grant an injunction restraining contractor Space from presenting a winding up petition against the employer COD.  The employer had failed to pay 3 applications for payment (nos.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Construction, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Robert Meakin , Rachel Chaplin
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Current page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days