Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    FYI: SD Fla Holds Borrowers Have No Right to Contest Foreclosure, Despite "Surrender" and "Abandonment" of Property in BK
    2015-12-18

    In a case addressing what it means to "surrender" property under the Bankruptcy Code, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida recently held that a Chapter 7 trustee's abandonment of real property only restores legal title to the debtors as if no bankruptcy petition had been filed, and does not also give the debtors the right to contest the mortgagee's foreclosure if the debtors elected to surrender the property.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Foreclosure
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    5th Cir. Rejects Borrower’s Texas Foreclosure Statute of Limitations Challenge
    2019-12-26

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently affirmed judgment against a borrower for quiet title claims brought against the owner and servicer of her mortgage loan, and entered judgment of foreclosure in the loan owner and servicer’s favor on their counterclaims for foreclosure against the borrower.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Mortgage loan, Title 11 of the US Code, Google
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    4th Cir. Holds Time-Barred Proof of Claim Does Not Violate FDCPA
    2016-08-30

    In a split decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit recently held that “filing a proof of claim in a Chapter 13 bankruptcy based on a debt that is time-barred does not violate the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act when the statute of limitations does not extinguish the debt.”

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Statute of limitations, Debt, Debt collection, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Brent Yarborough
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    FYI: NJ Fed Ct Confirms Debtor's Failure to Schedule Claims in Bankruptcy Requires Dismissal
    2015-12-13

    The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey recently dismissed a debtor's claims for violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the New Jersey Truth in Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA), holding the debtor's failure to schedule his lawsuit as an asset of his bankruptcy estate deprived him of standing to later assert the claims.

    A copy of the opinion is available at: Link to Opinion

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), US District Court for District of New Jersey
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    3rd Cir. Holds Failure to Turn Over Collateral Repossessed Prior to Bankruptcy Does Not Violate Automatic Stay
    2019-11-13

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently held, in a case of first impression in that circuit, that a secured creditor’s failure to turn over collateral repossessed prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition does not violate the automatic stay.

    A copy of the opinion inIn re Denby-Peterson is available at: Link to Opinion.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Hector E. Lora
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    6th Cir. BAP Holds In Rem Foreclosure Not Disguised In Personam Collection Effort
    2016-08-15

    The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit recently held that a condominium unit owners association did not violate a debtor’s Chapter 7 discharge order by scheduling a sheriff’s sale to complete a prepetition foreclosure.

    Rejecting the bankruptcy court’s conclusion that the in rem foreclosure sale was scheduled to induce payment of discharged pre-petition condominium fees, the Sixth Circuit BAP noted that “all foreclosure litigation potentially can induce payments of discharged debt to avoid a foreclosure sale.”

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Debt, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Condominium, In rem jurisdiction, Bankruptcy discharge, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Sixth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    FDCPA Lawsuit Tossed for Failure to Disclose Claim in Bankruptcy Petition
    2015-12-10

    The U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey recently dismissed a debtor’s claims for violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the New Jersey Truth in Consumer Contract Warranty and Notice Act (TCCWNA), holding the debtor’s failure to schedule his lawsuit as an asset of his bankruptcy estate deprived him of standing to later assert the claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), US District Court for District of New Jersey
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    5th Cir. Holds Bankruptcy Courts Cannot Enforce Discharge Injunctions From Other Districts
    2019-11-01

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently held that a bankruptcy court lacks the power to enforce discharge injunctions entered in other districts, and that the debtors’ particular private education loans were not excepted from discharge.

    A copy of the opinion in Crocker v. Navient Solutions, LLC is available at: Link to Opinion.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Student loan, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Hector E. Lora
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    7th Cir. Deepens Split on FDCPA Liability for ‘Time-Barred’ Claims
    2016-08-11

    Filing a proof of claim with a bankruptcy court representing a debt subject to an expired state law limitations period does not violate the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) under an opinion released yesterday from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals.

    Under the ruling, in Owens v. LVNV, the Seventh Circuit joins the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in rejecting the Eleventh Circuit’s holding under Crawford v. LVNV that such proofs of claim violate the FDCPA.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Debt, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Donald Maurice
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    9th Cir. holds ‘Chapter 20’ debtor may void mortgage in Chapter 13 after obtaining discharge in Chapter 7 bankruptcy
    2015-10-26

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in a case of first impression, recently held that section 1328(f) of the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act (BAPCPA), which bars so-called “Chapter 20” debtors from receiving a discharge at the conclusion of their Chapter 13 reorganization if they received a Chapter 7 discharge within four years of filing the petition for Chapter 13 relief, does not prevent a debtor from voiding a secured creditor’s lien under section 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Debtor, Secured creditor, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 444
    • Page 445
    • Page 446
    • Page 447
    • Current page 448
    • Page 449
    • Page 450
    • Page 451
    • Page 452
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days