Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Lothian Oil: Fifth Circuit recharacterizes non-insiders’ debt claim as equity
    2011-10-19

    On August 9, 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that a non-insider's debt claim can be recharacterized as equity in Grossman v. Lothian Oil Inc. (In re Lothian Oil, Inc.).2 The Fifth Circuit, in reversing the district court, held that: (i) there is no per se rule limiting to insiders the recharacterization of debt claims as equity and (ii) non-insider debt claims may be recharacterized as equity under section 502(b) of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morrison & Foerster LLP, Royalty payment, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Stefan W. Engelhardt , John A. Pintarelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morrison & Foerster LLP
    Shopping center in Provo, Utah
    2011-10-13

    In re Provo Gateway, LLC (Bankr. D. Utah) Case no. 11-31259

    Filed under:
    USA, Utah, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Leasehold estate, Accounts receivable, Limited liability company, Personal property, Holding company
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Mortgage company in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    2011-10-13

    In re Gelt Financial Corporation (Bankr. E.D. Pa.) Case no. 11-15827

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Mortgage loan, Default (finance)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Demolition and abatement company in Chesapeake, Virginia
    2011-10-13

    In re East Coast Abatement Co. Inc. (Bankr. E.D. Va.) Case no. 11-73560

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Accounts receivable, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    169-unit apartment building in Sherman Oaks, California
    2011-10-13

    In re Summer View Sherman Oaks Apartments, LLC (Bankr. C.D. Cal.) Case no. 11-19800

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Accounts receivable, Limited liability company, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Computer developer in Madison, Wisconsin
    2011-10-13

    In re MicroBlade, LLC (Bankr. W.D. Wis.) Case no. 11-14981

    Filed under:
    USA, Wisconsin, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Patents, Telecoms, Trademarks, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Patent infringement, Accounts receivable, Limited liability company, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Smack-down of a straitjacket
    2011-10-13

    Postconfirmation liquidation and litigation trusts have become an important mechanism in a chapter 11 bankruptcy estate’s arsenal, allowing for the resolution of claims and interests without needlessly delaying confirmation in the interim. The specter of postconfirmation litigation may seem unremarkable. Section 1123(b)(3)(B) of the Bankruptcy Code states that a plan may provide for retention or enforcement by the reorganized debtor, the trustee, or a representative of the estate of any claim or interest belonging to the estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Coal, Standing (law), Liquidation, Bright-line rule, MFG.com, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Seventh Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Texas, US District Court for Southern District of Texas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Shopping center properties in North Carolina
    2011-10-13

    In re Piedmont Center Investments, LLC (Bankr. E.D. Wis.) Case no. 11-32453

    Filed under:
    USA, North Carolina, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Litigation, Real Estate, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Accounts receivable, Limited liability company, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Third Circuit to directors of insolvent entity – you may be in “deepening” trouble now
    2011-10-14

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Fraud, Fiduciary, Federal Reporter, Negligence, Business judgement rule, Corporate bond, Chief financial officer, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Joshua Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Valid foreclosure sale may still be subject to preference attack
    2011-10-13

    In the recent case of Whittle Development, Inc. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co. (In re Whittle Development, Inc.), No. 10-37084, 2011 WL 3268398 (N.D. Tex. July 27, 2011), a bankruptcy court was asked whether a preference action could be sustained against a creditor who purchased real property in a properly conducted state law foreclosure sale. Recognizing a split of authority and some contrary principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in its prior decision, BFP v. Resolution Trust Corp., 511 U.S. 531 (1994), the bankruptcy court found that a preference claim could be asserted.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Default (finance), Debtor in possession, Trustee, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael Distefano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 291
    • Page 292
    • Page 293
    • Page 294
    • Current page 295
    • Page 296
    • Page 297
    • Page 298
    • Page 299
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days