In Short
The Situation: For the first time ever, a court in France has examined the compatibility of the statutory netting safe harbor with the French Constitution. The French High Court of Justice (Cour de cassation) addressed the preliminary question of constitutionality in the context of an insolvency proceeding and handed down its decision on March 6, 2024.
The opening of safeguard or reorganisation proceedings does not automatically terminate a current agreement notwithstanding any contractual clause providing for termination.
Termination by a lessor
The Commercial Chamber of the French Supreme Court ("Cour de cassation") has recently handed down a decision of particular interest for distressed M&A transactions: Cass. com. 1er mars 2023, no. 21-14.787, FS-B.
Alexandre Koenig, partner and head of the firm's restructuring and insolvency practice in France analyses the legal and practical consequences of this decision for sellers of French distressed companies.
Context
Strelia a assisté un franchiseur dans le cadre d’une procédure introduite contre une caution personnelle – gérant de société – qui souhaitait échapper à ses obligations de caution en invoquant sa faillite personnelle. Selon la Cour de cassation, un dirigeant d’entreprise ne peut cependant pas automatiquement être qualifié d’entreprise et faire aussi facilement aveu de faillite.
Strelia assisted a franchisor in an action brought against a personal surety – a company director – who attempted to escape his obligations by filing for his personal bankruptcy. However, according to the Court of Cassation, a company director cannot automatically be considered as an enterprise and therefore is not capable of filing for bankruptcy.
Strelia stond een franchisegever bij in een procedure tegen een persoonlijke borgsteller – een bedrijfsleider – die zich aan zijn verplichtingen als borg wilde onttrekken door zichzelf failliet te laten verklaren. Echter, volgens het Hof van Cassatie kan een bedrijfsleider niet automatisch als onderneming gekwalificeerd worden en dus niet zomaar zijn faillissement aanvragen.
As well as the Deka Legal Bake, last week witnessed the publication of the updated ASHE and a further judgment on the subject of jurisdiction, which seems to be a growth area in satellite litigation, perhaps unsurprisingly given the effect of Exit Day.
How the Belgian Cour de Cassation qualifies a director of a company as an “enterprise”
Since the entry into force of the new Belgian Code of Economic Law (‘BCEL’) it is possible for a company director, in its personal capacity, to be qualified as an “enterprise” and consequently to be declared bankrupt.
The definition of an enterprise is set out in Article I.1, 1° BCEL and relates to the following organisations:
a) any natural person who independently performs a professional activity;
On 11 November 2021, the CJEU (C-340/20) ruled that the freezing of assets and economic resources under the EU restrictive measures (economic sanctions) precludes protective measures by creditors. Therefore, creditors should proactively seek protective measures or rely on a sanctions regime’s exception.
Restrictive measures
The reform resulting from Order no. 2021-1193 dated September 15, 2021 is applicable to proceedings initiated as of October 1, 2021
French insolvency law is undergoing a far-reaching reform, 7 years after the last major reform that came from Order No. 2014-326 of March 12, 2014. This reform is the result of Order No. 2021-1193 amending Book VI of the French Commercial Code, adopted by the Council of Ministers on Wednesday, September 15, 2021 (the Order).