Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Section 38 BIA claims – it’s what you know that counts
    2011-03-25

    Pursuant to section 38 of theBankruptcy and Insolvency Act, R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (the “BIA”) a creditor of the bankrupt estate can obtain the trustee’s right to pursue estate litigation where the trustee refuses or fails to pursue such litigation. In a recent Ontario case, Indcondo Building Corp. v. Sloan [2010], CarswellOnt 9785, the Court of Appeal was asked to determine whether the limitation period for the assigned litigation commences with the trustee’s knowledge of the facts giving rise to the claim or the assignee’s knowledge of those facts.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Statute of limitations, Discovery, Option (finance), Conveyancing, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Larry Ellis
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    "Directors' and officers' liability in the shadow of insolvency"
    2011-03-29

    Advising directors and officers of companies that are in the shadow of insolvency regarding the scope of their personal liability can be a daunting task as directors and officers can be exposed to significant personal liability in a variety of areas of the law. Directors are now accountable not only to the corporation and its shareholders but also under certain circumstances to employees, creditors, customers, suppliers, and governments.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Shareholder, Board of directors, Supply chain
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    No Crown super-priority for HST in CCAA proceedings
    2011-03-30

    In its recent decision in Century Services Inc v Canada,1 the Supreme Court of Canada (the “SCC”) held that, in the context of a Companies’Creditors Arrangement Act2 (the “CCAA”) proceeding, the Crown does not have a superpriority claim over the property of a debtor for unremitted goods and services tax (“GST”) amounts. The decision of the SCC majority rejected existing appellate-level case law, and brought the priority of Crown claims in-line with what they are in bankruptcy proceedings.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Income tax, Excise, Tax deduction, Harmonised sales tax, Dissenting opinion, Unemployment benefits, Goods and services tax (Canada), Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Sam Babe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    The sale of assets by a receiver: a cautionary tale
    2011-03-30

    The case of Canrock Ventures LLC v. Ambercore Software Inc. et al is a cautionary tale for a Receiver and its counsel alike. In this case, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice rejected a Receiver’s application for the approval of an asset purchase agreement because of a failure to take the requisite steps when conducting a sale process and, in the Court’s view, failing to remain a neutral officer of the Court.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Advertising, Interest, Limited liability company, Debt, Foreclosure, Secured creditor, Subsidiary, Debenture, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Ian Aversa
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    Credifinance Securities Limited v DSLC Capital Corp
    2011-03-30

    2011 ONCA 160 (Released March 2, 2011)

    Trustee – Constructive Trust – Fraud – Bankruptcy

    In this case, the Court of Appeal for Ontario explained the conditions under which a constructive trust remedy can be granted in favour of defrauded creditors after the fraudster enters into bankruptcy proceedings.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, WeirFoulds LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Constructive trust, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Faren H. Bogach
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    WeirFoulds LLP
    Appeals from disallowances of claims by trustees: true appeals or hearings de novo?
    2011-03-14

    One of the duties of a trustee is to examine each claim presented by a potential creditor of the
    bankrupt and to determine whether such a claim is valid. A trustee is entitled, under
    subsection 135(2) of the BIA, to disallow any claim, priority or security that it finds unproven or
    invalid. In the event that a creditor’s claim is disallowed by a trustee, that creditor is entitled to appeal that decision to the superior court in the province. A creditor has 30 days after the
    receipt of the trustee’s reasons for disallowance to file an appeal, although an extension may be

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Discovery, Standard of review, Admissible evidence, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Section 38 claims
    2011-03-14

    Section 38 provides a mechanism by which a creditor can take the place of the trustee in any proceeding where the trustee refuses or fails to act. Essentially, the creditor stands in the place of the trustee and, if successful in the proceeding, is entitled to keep all proceeds, except those that exceed the total of the creditor’s claim and the creditor’s costs of the proceeding. Any surplus proceeds received by the creditor are the property of the bankrupt’s estate.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Interest, Prima facie, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Section 163 examinations
    2011-03-14

    Section 163 gives the trustee the broad power to examine the bankrupt, any person who would be reasonably thought to know the affairs of the bankrupt, or any person who is or has been an agent, clerk, officer, director or employee with respect to the bankrupt or the bankrupt’s dealings. Essentially, this section gives the trustee the power to examine any person who is capable of providing information on the bankrupt.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Solicitor, Secured creditor, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Trustee
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    The CCAA scene: recent and notable – February 2011
    2011-02-02

    Abitibi

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Subsidiary, Secured loan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Quebec Superior Court, British Columbia Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Alex Tarantino
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Collected and unremitted GST not a Crown priority under CCAA
    2011-02-02

    Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2010 SCC 60

    Section 222(3) of the Excise Tax Act creates a deemed trust for unremitted GST, which operates despite any other act of Canada, except the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act. However section 18.3(1) of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the "CCAA") provides that any statutory deemed trust in favour of the Crown does not operate under the CCAA, subject to certain exceptions which do not mention GST.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Excise, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Goods and services tax (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Supreme Court of Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 126
    • Page 127
    • Page 128
    • Page 129
    • Current page 130
    • Page 131
    • Page 132
    • Page 133
    • Page 134
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days