Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Pope & Talbot Ltd. (Re)
    2011-09-13

    The appellant insurer sought leave to appeal the order of the Chambers Judge who dismissed it’s application to be added as a party or intervener in an underlying liability action in the Supreme Court of British Columbia.

    [2011] B.C.J. No. 1336

    2011 BCCA 326

    British Columbia Court of Appeal (In Bankruptcy and Insolvency)

    P.A. Kirkpatrick J.A. (In Chambers)

    July 8, 2011

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Harper Grey LLP, Bankruptcy, Involuntary dismissal, Subsidiary
    Authors:
    Cameron B. Elder , David Pilley
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Harper Grey LLP
    Determining the centre of main interest in corporate group CCAA filings
    2011-09-14

    A number of commentators have written articles about Part IV of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), which deals with recognizing and enforcing foreign insolvency proceedings, however little has been written about the treatment of corporate groups in this context. Part IV of the CCAA deals with entities on an individual basis, and how to deal with corporate groups is not well addressed in international insolvency legislation.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Debtor, Interest, Secured creditor, General Electric, Novartis v. Union of India & Others, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, US District Court for District of Massachusetts
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Heenan Blaikie LLP
    Limitation of Chapter 15 jurisdiction thwarts foreign funds’ claims against investors
    2011-09-22

    U.S. bankruptcy courts may be advantageous forums for foreign liquidators to organize large scale lawsuits; however, courts will impose limitations.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Torys LLP, Liquidator (law), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Torys LLP
    Distinctions with a difference: comparison of restructurings under the CCAA with Chapter 11 law and practice
    2011-09-26

    introduction

    In Canada legislative authority is divided between the federal and provincial governments by subject matter. "Bankruptcy and insolvency" is a matter of federal jurisdiction, while "property and civil rights" is generally within the jurisdiction of the provinces.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, McMillan LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Income tax, Liquidation, Unemployment benefits, Secured creditor, US Federal Government, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Spotlight on security documents: the landlord waiver
    2011-09-30

    Having enforceable security over all of a borrower’s assets is obviously of primary importance to a lender.  However, where a borrower occupies leased premises, ensuring the lender has quick and reliable access to the collateral is equally important, especially if the landlord proves to be unco-operative after a borrower’s default.  Although court-ordered access to a borrower’s leased premises can be sought after a borrower’s loan default, a landlord waiver obtained prior to an initial advance of a loan can bring some added certainty to the realization process outside of a bankrup

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Gowling WLG, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Landlord, Leasehold estate, Waiver, Consent, Personal property, Default (law), Default (finance)
    Authors:
    Richard C. Dusome
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    CRA getting aggressive in asserting deemed trust over mortgage proceeds
    2011-05-16

    Unremitted source deductions are subject to a deemed trust in favour of the Crown under Section 227 of the Income Tax Act (the “ITA”), Section 86 of theEmployment Insurance Act (the “EIA”) and Section 23 of the Canada Pension Plan (the “CPP”). Subsection 227(4) of the ITA creates the trust for income tax deductions and Subsection 227(4.1) creates a super-priority lien in favour of the Crown, in the amount of the trust, over all the debtor’s assets.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Personal property, Excise, Unemployment benefits, Canada Revenue Agency, Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Income-Tax Act 1961 (India)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    Rights of set-off in insolvency
    2011-05-18

    When a company winds up, begins restructuring proceedings or goes bankrupt, a debtor or creditor may be able to cancel out the amount payable to the other party by using the remedy of “set‐off”. Set‐off involves the cancelling of crossliabilities between two parties who owe each other money. It is a valuable tool that can increase a creditor’s percentage of recovery and decrease the debt burden of a debtor.

    Types of Set‐off: Contractual, Legal or Equitable

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consideration, Debt, Common law
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    The Open for Business Act: Bill 68 – An act to promote Ontario as open for business by amending or repealing certain acts - enacted as: Chapter 16 of the Statutes of Ontario, 2010
    2011-05-19

    Bill 68 – An Act to promote Ontario as open for business by amending or repealing
    certain Acts (the “Open for Business Act”)1 received Royal Assent on October 25,
    2010. It is an omnibus Act which contains more than 100 amendments to existing
    legislation spread out across 10 ministries.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Company & Commercial, Construction, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Dentons, Constitutional amendment
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Comments on the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark insolvency decision in Ted LeRoy Trucking
    2011-05-20

    The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), which arose from the restructuring proceedings of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd. and was released on December 6, 2010, is a landmark decision in Canadian insolvency law.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Statutory interpretation, Debt, Liquidation, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran , Heather L. Meredith
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Taking a second look at lessors’ risk in airline insolvencies in Canada
    2011-05-27

    On April 6, 2011, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released its decision in the priority disputes between the lessors and aviation authorities resulting from the Skyservice receivership. The Court, in interpreting and applying the decisions in Canada 3000 and Zoom Airlines, may have raised the bar for lessors to defeat the seizure and detention rights of the aviation authorities in Canada.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Ex parte, Airport, Net asset value, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 121
    • Page 122
    • Page 123
    • Page 124
    • Current page 125
    • Page 126
    • Page 127
    • Page 128
    • Page 129
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days