Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Motion to dismiss Lehman-related securities class action denied
    2010-05-28

    Judge John Koeltl in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently denied a motion to dismiss a securities class action arising, in part, from the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Class action, Maturity (finance), Involuntary dismissal, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Securities Exchange Act 1934 (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Lehman Brothers, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    William M. Regan , Jessica M. Garrett
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC issues statement regarding bankruptcy treatment of cleared-only contracts
    2008-10-03

    In an interpretive statement, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission has taken the position that “cleared-only contracts,” over-the-counter contracts submitted for clearing through a futures commission merchant to a derivatives clearing organization, should be included within the definition of “net equity” for purposes of U.S. Bankruptcy Code provisions applicable to commodity brokers. The CFTC’s interpretation generally would treat cleared-only contracts in the same manner as exchange-traded futures contracts in the event of a futures commission merchant bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Commodity, Futures contract, Commodity broker, Title 11 of the US Code, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Effectively Defending Adversarial Actions Brought Against Former D&Os in Bankruptcy Court
    2017-02-23

    For many litigants, the decision whether to prosecute or defend a lawsuit vigorously boils down to a rather basic calculus: What are my chances of success? What is the potential recovery or loss? Is this a "bet the company" litigation? And, how much will I have to pay the lawyers? In many respects, it is not all that different from a poker player eyeing his chip stack and deciding whether the pot odds and implied odds warrant the call of a big bet.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Judge overseeing Lehman Brothers bankruptcy cases issues decision on setoff in bankruptcy and directs Swedbank AB to surrender post-petition deposits
    2010-05-14

    On May 5, the judge overseeing the bankruptcy case of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc issued an opinion refusing Swedbank AB's request to keep several million dollars in post-bankruptcy Lehman deposits as a setoff against pre-bankruptcy swap termination claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Debt, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    FSA bankrupts boiler room controller
    2008-06-27

    On June 26, the UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) announced that it obtained a bankruptcy order against Samuel Nathan Kahn who controlled the affairs of Chesteroak Limited (Chesteroak) and Bingen Investments Limited (Bingen). Chesteroak and Bingen were two UK-based companies that helped illegal offshore boiler rooms sell shares to investors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, FSA
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Lehman Brothers Court Holds Swap Safe Harbor Protects ‘Flip’ Transactions
    2016-07-08

    The bankruptcy court overseeing the Lehman Brothers chapter 11 cases rejected efforts by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) to recover roughly $1 billion in payments made to numerous noteholder defendants from the liquidation of collateral originally pledged to secure both obligations under notes issued by special purpose entities and credit default swap (CDS) obligations to LBSF, holding that the termination of the swap and liquidation and distribution of the collateral were protected by the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Title 11 of the US Code, Bank of America, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Jeff J. Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC creates separate bankruptcy account class for cleared otc derivatives
    2010-04-02

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has amended its bankruptcy rules (17 C.F.R. Part 190) to create a new “account class” for cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives for purposes of calculating customer “net equity” and “allowed net equity” in the event of the bankruptcy of a futures commission merchant.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Collateral (finance), Commodity broker, Commodity Exchange Act 1936 (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Treatment of customers and financial counterparties in stockbroker liquidations under SIPA and the Bankruptcy Code
    2008-06-04

    With the possibility of a major stock brokerage liquidation appearing more likely than it has been in recent periods, the effect of a liquidation on customers and financial counterparties has become of great interest to many of our clients and others.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Injunction, Security (finance), Swap (finance), Economy, Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Brokerage firm, Title 11 of the US Code, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Sabine Court Issues Industry-Affecting Non-Binding Opinion
    2016-03-16

    The financial pressure on the oil and gas industry is well known. Dozens of oil and gas companies have defaulted on credit facilities or filed bankruptcy recently and industry observers expect many more to follow.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Craig A. Barbarosh , Karen B. Dine , Jerry L. Hall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    The impact of Philadelphia Newspapers on Chapter 11 asset sales
    2010-03-29

    On March 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision that could significantly impact the rights of secured creditors to credit bid in connection with Chapter 11 asset sales under a plan of reorganization.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Dissenting opinion, Secured creditor, Leverage (finance), Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Chief executive officer
    Authors:
    Kenneth E. Noble
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 737
    • Page 738
    • Page 739
    • Page 740
    • Current page 741
    • Page 742
    • Page 743
    • Page 744
    • Page 745
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days