Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Culpability required for securities fraud exception to debt discharge in bankruptcy
    2011-09-28

    On September 19th, the Ninth Circuit considered whether the exception to Chapter 7 bankruptcy discharge for debts resulting from a violation of state or federal securities laws applies when the debtor himself is not culpable for the securities violation that caused the debt. The case involved an attorney who was required by court order to return the unearned retainer paid by a company that engaged in securities fraud. The attorney filed a petition for Chapter 7 bankruptcy before he was technically required to return the money.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Security (finance), Debt, Securities fraud, Bankruptcy discharge, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    First Circuit modifies sanctions awarded against mortgage servicer
    2010-06-21

    On June 14th, the First Circuit modified the bankruptcy court's $250,000 sanction award against a mortgage servicer who erroneously claimed to be the mortgage holder. The mortgage servicer did not deliberately or intentionally seek to mislead the bankruptcy court and its actions were not prejudicial. First Circuit therefore modified the award to $5,000. In re Jacalyn S. Nosek.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Prejudice, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Bankruptcy Court denies confirmation of WaMu’s plan of reorganization
    2011-09-23

    Sending the Debtors back to the drawing board after almost three years in bankruptcy, in a 139 page opinion, the Bankruptcy Court has for the second time denied confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization for Washington Mutual, Inc. (“WaMu”), which was the owner of the largest savings bank ever to be seized by the FDIC.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Insider trading, Liability (financial accounting), Mediation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), JPMorgan Chase, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Federal district courts may issue anti-litigation orders in SEC receivership matters
    2010-06-21

    On June 15th, the Second Circuit held that district courts may issue anti-litigation injunctions barring bankruptcy filings as part of their broad equitable powers in the context of an SEC receivership. SEC v. Byers. Reuters reported on the involuntary bankruptcy petitions filed by creditors which prompted the district court's anti-litigation order.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Injunction, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Second Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Lehman Brothers Court Holds Swap Safe Harbor Protects ‘Flip’ Transactions
    2016-07-08

    The bankruptcy court overseeing the Lehman Brothers chapter 11 cases rejected efforts by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (LBSF) to recover roughly $1 billion in payments made to numerous noteholder defendants from the liquidation of collateral originally pledged to secure both obligations under notes issued by special purpose entities and credit default swap (CDS) obligations to LBSF, holding that the termination of the swap and liquidation and distribution of the collateral were protected by the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Title 11 of the US Code, Bank of America, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Jeff J. Friedman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    CFTC creates separate bankruptcy account class for cleared otc derivatives
    2010-04-02

    The Commodity Futures Trading Commission has amended its bankruptcy rules (17 C.F.R. Part 190) to create a new “account class” for cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives for purposes of calculating customer “net equity” and “allowed net equity” in the event of the bankruptcy of a futures commission merchant.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Clearing (finance), Collateral (finance), Commodity broker, Commodity Exchange Act 1936 (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission, Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Treatment of customers and financial counterparties in stockbroker liquidations under SIPA and the Bankruptcy Code
    2008-06-04

    With the possibility of a major stock brokerage liquidation appearing more likely than it has been in recent periods, the effect of a liquidation on customers and financial counterparties has become of great interest to many of our clients and others.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Injunction, Security (finance), Swap (finance), Economy, Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Brokerage firm, Title 11 of the US Code, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Sabine Court Issues Industry-Affecting Non-Binding Opinion
    2016-03-16

    The financial pressure on the oil and gas industry is well known. Dozens of oil and gas companies have defaulted on credit facilities or filed bankruptcy recently and industry observers expect many more to follow.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Craig A. Barbarosh , Karen B. Dine , Jerry L. Hall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    The impact of Philadelphia Newspapers on Chapter 11 asset sales
    2010-03-29

    On March 22, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit issued a decision that could significantly impact the rights of secured creditors to credit bid in connection with Chapter 11 asset sales under a plan of reorganization.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Dissenting opinion, Secured creditor, Leverage (finance), Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Chief executive officer
    Authors:
    Kenneth E. Noble
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Motion to dismiss claims against former officers and directors denied
    2007-04-06

    The District Court sustained claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud and deepening insolvency asserted by the successor-in-interest to the Committee of Unsecured Creditors of DVI, a defunct company, against DVI’s former officers and directors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Interest, Credit risk, Misrepresentation, Good faith, Business judgement rule, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Westlaw
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 734
    • Page 735
    • Page 736
    • Page 737
    • Current page 738
    • Page 739
    • Page 740
    • Page 741
    • Page 742
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days