The ability to sell an asset in bankruptcy free and clear of liens and any other competing “interest” is a well-recognized tool available to a trustee or chapter 11 debtor in possession (“DIP”). Whether the category of “interests” encompassed by that power extends to potential successor liability claims, however, has been the subject of considerable debate in the courts. A New York bankruptcy court recently addressed this controversial issue in Olson v. Frederico (In re Grumman Olson Indus., Inc.), 445 B.R. 243(Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2011).
On June 13, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) released a final rule that, in most cases, will reduce the amount of pension benefits guaranteed under the agency’s single-employer insurance program when a pension plan is terminated in a bankruptcy case. The rule will also decrease the amount of pension benefits given priority in bankruptcy.
Much attention in the commercial bankruptcy world has been devoted recently to judicial pronouncements concerning whether the practice of senior creditor class “gifting” to junior classes under a chapter 1 1 plan violates the Bankruptcy Code’s “absolute priority rule.” Comparatively little scrutiny, by contrast, has been directed toward significant developments in ongoing controversies in the courts regarding the absolute priority rule outside the realm of senior class gifting— namely, in connection with the “new value” exception to the rule and whether the rule was written out of the Bankr
In a case of first impression, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in In re American Home Mortg. Holdings, Inc., 637 F.3d 246 (3d Cir. 2011), held that, for purposes of section 562 of the Bankruptcy Code, a discounted cash flow analysis was a “commercially reasonable determinant” of value for the liquidation of mortgage loans in a repurchase transaction.
Most people think that bankruptcy is bad and try to avoid it. However, bankruptcy is a powerful legal tool and if using it the right way, it can solve your problems, whether you are a creditor or a debtor.
If you are a creditor, why should you file for bankruptcy?
1.1. If you are a creditor
Creditors often file normal lawsuits to collect the debts instead of using bankruptcy proceedings, because:
The Law on Bankruptcy 2014 (“New Law”) was officially approved at the 7th session of the XIII National Assembly.
The New Law expands its scope by clearly providing provisions on orders, application procedures and handling and opening of bankruptcy procedures; determination of property obligations and measures to preserve property in bankruptcy procedures; conditions and procedures for restoration of business operation, procedures for property liquidation and bankruptcy declaration and execution of judges’ decisions on bankruptcy.
In brief: Vietnam's new Law on Bankruptcy will take effect from 1 January 2015, bringing in a number of changes, including a new definition of 'bankruptcy'. Partner Robert Fish (view CV)and Junior Associates Giang Quang Nguyen and Linh Nguyen look at the most significant features of the new law and note what will differ from the current regime.
The implementation of restrictions on stock and/or claims trading has become almost routine in large chapter 11 cases involving public companies on the basis that such restrictions are vital to prevent forfeiture of favorable tax attributes that can be triggered by a change in control. Continued reliance on stock trading injunctions as a means of preserving net operating loss carry forwards, however, may be problematic, after the controversial ruling handed down in 2005 by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals in In re UAL Corp.