Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Perfection of security interests when assets move jurisdictions
    2017-05-17

    When a financing statement is registered to perfect a security interest in collateral, it is the responsibility of the secured party to monitor the registration to ensure that a new financing statement is filed if the goods move jurisdictions. A recent decision by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice1 emphasizes this point.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DLA Piper, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Secured creditor, Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    What impact does the EU restructuring directive have on debt finance?
    2019-06-28

    The EU Directive on restructuring and insolvency was published in the OJEU on Wednesday. Members states have until 17 July 2020 to implement it, and this includes the UK as it stands: the UK has much – but not all – of it already. The UK Government has its own plans for reforming insolvency law of course, including to re-introduce Crown Preference. It is mostly about creating a rescue framework.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, DLA Piper, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    NPL - Verso un mercato più trasparente grazie all’introduzione del Registro Elettronico delle Procedure
    2017-04-20

    I cd. NPL (non performing loans, letteralmente mutui non performanti) sono, sostanzialmente, crediti per i quali la riscossione è incerta, sia dal punto di vista del rispetto della scadenza originaria che per quanto riguarda l’ammontare del possibile recupero; essi sono anche detti, nel linguaggio bancario, crediti deteriorati.

    Filed under:
    Italy, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, DLA Piper
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    Appellate Courts Split On Bankruptcy Ownership Of Malpractice Claims
    2021-04-02

    The debtors' legal malpractice claim was "not property of their bankruptcy estate," held a split Ninth Circuit on June 30, 2020. In re Glaser, 816 Fed. Appx. 103, 104 (9th Cir. June 30, 2020) (2-1). But the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota one week later affirmed a bankruptcy court judgment that "the [debtor's] estate was the proper owner" of such a claim. In re Bruess, 2020 WL3642324, 1 (D. Minn. July 6, 2020).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, SCOTUS, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Split Ninth Circuit Requires Default Interest to Cure Default
    2016-12-02

    A Chapter 11 debtor “cannot nullify a preexisting obligation in a loan agreement to pay post-default interest solely by proposing a cure,” held a split panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Nov. 4, 2016. In re New Investments Inc., 2016 WL 6543520, *3 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2016) (2-1).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Lehman Brothers International (Europe) in administration: latest High Court decisions on application of surplus proceeds in the ‘Waterfall’ series of cases
    2015-08-04

    On 31 July 2015, the English High Court delivered its judgments in the ‘Waterfall IIA’ and ‘Waterfall IIB’ cases. The decisions are important to stakeholders in determining key questions about how, following payment in 2014 of all the provable claims, the estimated £7.39-billion surplus (the ‘Surplus’) in Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (‘LBIE’) will be shared amongst them. For others, the decisions may be of general interest in probing some rarely aired legal issues relating to the lower levels of the insolvency payment waterfall.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Lehman Brothers, High Court of Justice
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Debt traders settling post-reorganization equity
    2011-08-11

    DURING THE PAST YEAR, many investors in the distressed debt market have received postreorganization private equity1 either through a confirmed plan of reorganization or through participation in a rights offering. Unlike publicly traded equity, each new issuance of postreorganization equity leaves recipients, issuers, and agents potentially facing uncharted territory in terms of how the instrument is to trade and settle.

    Filed under:
    Global, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Share (finance), Public company, Corporate governance, Shareholder, Debtor, Private equity, Security (finance), Market liquidity, Consideration, Debt, Distressed securities
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Adam C. Harris , David J. Karp , Neil S. Begley
    Location:
    Global
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Update on Corporate Bankruptcy Tax Refund Litigation
    2021-01-28

    The bankruptcy trustee of a bank holding company was not entitled to a consolidated corporate tax refund when a bank subsidiary had incurred losses generating the refund, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on May 26, 2020. Rodriguez v. FDIC (In re United Western Bancorp, Inc.), 2020 WL 2702425(10th Cir May 26, 2020). On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, the Tenth Circuit, as directed, applied "Colorado law to resolve" the question of "who owns the federal tax refund." Id., at 2.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Ninth Circuit Insulates California Tax Sale from Fraudulent Transfer Attack
    2016-09-21

    “[T]he price received at a California tax sale” properly held under state law “conclusively establishes ‘reasonably equivalent value’ for purposes of” the Bankruptcy Code’s (“Code”) fraudulent transfer section (§ 548(a)(1)), held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on Sept. 8, 2016. In re Tracht Gut LLC, 2016 WL4698300, at *1 (9th Cir. Sept. 8, 2016). Affirming the lower courts, the Ninth Circuit reasoned that “California tax sales have the same procedural safeguards as the California mortgage foreclosure sale” approved by the U.S. Supreme Court in BFP v.

    Filed under:
    USA, California, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Mortgage loan, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Court validates rescue loan, rejecting equitable subordination and fraudulent transfer claims
    2015-05-22

    A bank did not engage in “egregious conduct” sufficient to subordinate its lien on equitable grounds, held the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on Dec. 10, 2014. In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc., 2014 WL 6990322 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2014) (“Sentinel IV”). Moreover, because of the bank’s “good faith,” the corrupt borrower’s fraudulent pledging of customer funds to the bank to secure a so-called $312-million rescue loan “cannot be avoided.” Id. at *10.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 507
    • Page 508
    • Page 509
    • Page 510
    • Current page 511
    • Page 512
    • Page 513
    • Page 514
    • Page 515
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days