The Australian Government has introduced new laws which are intended to avoid unnecessary corporate insolvencies in light of the challenges presented by the unfolding COVID-19 global pandemic. The new laws came into effect on 25 March 2020 and include:

The impact of the COVID-19 crisis and the health-related measures implemented by the government to contain the spread of this deadly virus will unfortunately result in the economy going into recession.

In an article in the Financial Review, the results of a survey of economists revealed that even taking into account all the government’s stimulus and job-saving measures, the Australian economy will be in recession until June 2021.

NON-FISCAL POLICIES TO HELP BUSINESSES OUTLAST THE COVID-19 VIRUS

In non-coronavirus news for the insolvency sector, the 26 March judgment of the NSW Supreme Court in Aardwolf Industries LLC v Riad Tayeh provides reassurance to insolvency practitioners who take on the (often understated and unprofitable) work of being a court appointed liquidator.

The Court has restated the principle that its leave must be sought prior to commencing proceedings against a court appointed liquidator for the way in which the liquidation was conducted. The Court identified two reasons.

This week’s TGIF examines the recent changes to Australia’s insolvency regime, the potential implications for business and considerations for creditors in light of the impact from COVID-19.

The Australian Government has now passed theCoronavirus Economic Response Package Omnibus Bill 2020. The bill was fast-tracked through both houses of parliament with bipartisan support on 23 March 2020 and makes significant changes to Australia’s insolvency regime over the next six months.

What happened?

With the impact of COVID-19 rapidly being felt by businesses, 2020 is likely to see a number of Australian insureds face insolvency. While this presents a number of challenges for (re)insurers in the Australian market, there are steps that (re)insurers can take to manage the situation and their exposures.

In a recent decision in the Supreme Court of NSW[1], Rees J set aside a liquidator’s bid to publicly examine two senior officers of the National Rugby League (NRL), finding that examination summonses issued by the liquidator were an abuse of process and the entire liquidation process was a contrivance in order to exert commercial pressure on the NRL.

As part of its response to the national emergency arising from the spread of the Coronavirus, the government announced changes to insolvent trading duties in March 2020.

This will assist organisations under pressure to keep going, pay necessary staff and be positioned to return to normal business.

The relevant legislation (Coronavirus Economic Response Package Omibus Act 2020 (Cth) (the Act)) came into effect on 24 March 2020.

Critically, the laws have been softened, not repealed, and other directors’ duties remain in place.

The voluntary administration procedure in the Corporations Act was introduced in 1993. Prior to this, the only formal mechanism for a company to compromise with its creditors was by a creditors’ scheme of arrangement, a process often regarded as costly, time consuming and cumbersome.

The primary objective of voluntary administration is to provide for the business, property and affairs of an insolvent company to be administered in a way that:

In challenging financial times, a company director’s role is fraught with difficult decisions regarding continued operations and the preservation of the business. These decisions may be influenced by the risk of personal liability to the director.

Outlined in, Directors’ Duties in Uncertain Financial Times, we canvassed the issues facing a director when the company’s financial viability comes into question.