Corporate ventures are usually founded with the very best intentions, but as matters unfold disputes between investors are all too common.
The legal steps to resolve such disputes and assert control over a company can be complex and arduous.
However, there are good reasons for this due process, and it cannot be circumvented.
Illegal phoenix activity occurs when a company liquidates its operations to avoid paying its creditors, taxes and other regulatory payments. Before liquidation, the company transfers its assets to a newly created company which operates in the same, or similar industry and the same directors or close associates maintain control.
This week’s TGIF considers an appeal to the Full Court of the Federal Court for the termination of a deed of company arrangement , in circumstances where the appellants argued that liquidation of the company would provide a better return to creditors.
Key takeaways
For many years, Machiavelli Ristorante Italiano in the Sydney CBD was the place for the business and political elite to be seen and to talk business.
More recently, the Supreme Court of New South Wales was the place for the new owners of the Machiavelli Ristorante to be seen to litigate their partnership disputes.
The case is In the matter of Bicher & Son Pty Ltd [2020] NSWSC 711 (9 June 2020) (Black J).
In early June 2020, Social Ventures Australia (SVA) alongside the Centre for Social Impact (CSI), published a report (Report) detailing the likely impact of COVID-19 on the charity sector.
The judgment in RCR Tomlinson Ltd (Admins apptd) [2020] NSWSC 735 provides clarification regarding the classification of circulating and non-circulating assets for the purpose of section 561 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act). The decision provides useful guidance for insolvency practitioners classifying circulating and non-circulating assets.
Whilst the power of a chairperson to exercise a casting vote at creditors’ meetings is a useful mechanism to resolve a deadlock in voting, it does not confer unconstrained discretion. The recent Glenfyne Appeal[1] provides valuable guidance as to the appropriate exercise of a casting vote and also serves as a reminder of the Court’s significant powers to review and reverse failed creditors’ resolutions due to the exercise of a casting vote.
On 13 December 2019, in Franz Boensch as Trustee of the Boensch Trust v Scott Darren Pascoe[1] the High Court unanimously dismissed an appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia, in which the appellant sought compensation from his former trustee in bankruptcy pursuant to section 74P of the Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) (RPA).
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly reshaped the global business landscape. Some companies that only months ago seemed unstoppably profitable have been brought to an existential brink by extended lockdowns, supply chain failures, and other obstacles caused by the pandemic. Other companies who have experienced less disruption (or in some cases windfalls) stand at the threshold of opportunity even as they prepare themselves for the challenges of the 'new normal'.
It is said that Sisyphus, the ancient king of Ephyra, is destined for eternity to roll a boulder uphill, only to watch it roll down again. Perhaps Sisyphus should have been a liquidator. One could certainly forgive the liquidator of Aberdeen All Farm Pty Ltd (In Liq) (Aberdeen) for thinking so.
After taking appointment in February 2018, Aberdeen has been embroiled in Supreme Court litigation, by which certain parcels of land were claimed to have been held on trust for Barry McWhinney as a result of an alleged fraud.