Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Re Diffraction Diamonds DMCC [2017] EWHC 1368 (Ch)
    2017-06-27

    A case of two companies, one incorporated in Dubai and the other in England, involved in a network of businesses producing contrived fancy colour diamond valuations were eventually wound up by English courts in the interest of the public.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, England, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Sarah Shrimpton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Deemed Consent - Rule 15.7
    2017-04-13

    [Note: deemed consent cannot be used to decide on remuneration, or where the Act/Rules requires a decision by a decision procedure.]

    The Deemed Consent procedure is set out in sections 246ZF (corporate insolvency) and 379ZB (personal insolvency) of the Insolvency Act 1986, as inserted by the Small Business, Enterprise and Employment Act 2015, and rule 15.7 of the Insolvency Rules 2016.

    The deemed consent procedure is that relevant creditors/contributories are given notice:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ashfords LLP, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Olivia Bridger
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Insolvency Rules - Delivery of Documents
    2017-03-28

    The language of the rules has been amended and there is now more reference to delivery of documents rather than service. Rules 1.40 - 1.53 set out rules relating to delivery wherever documents are required to be delivered by the new rules.

    These rules include the following headings:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ashfords LLP
    Authors:
    Katie Farmer
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 - Claiming against insolvent defendants
    2016-11-28

    After much delay, the Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) came into force on 1 August 2016. The 2010 Act aims to assist parties wishing to claim against insolvent companies and individuals who supply professional services by allowing them to claim directly against their insurers.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Ashfords LLP
    Authors:
    Stephen Homer , Stuart Willis
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Marme Inversiones 2007 S.L. v The Royal Bank of Scotland et al [2016] EWHC 1570 (Comm)
    2016-07-08

    The UK Commercial Court has dismissed the Claimant's application for a stay under Article 28 of the Judgments Regulation.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Commercial property, Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Cashflow, Default (finance), Exclusive jurisdiction, Stay of execution, The Royal Bank of Scotland, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Emma Clayton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Cross Border Restructuring and Insolvency Update - December 2015
    2015-12-21

    Edgeworth Capital Luxembourg Sarl (2) Aabar Block Sarl V Glenn Maud [2015] EWHC 3464 (Comm)

    The High Court in England has ruled on whether Spanish Law has the effect of extinguishing third party guarantees when the beneficiary of the guaranteed liabilities enters into insolvency proceedings in Spain.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Unsecured debt, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Alan Bennett , Bethany Parr , Olivia Bridger
    Location:
    Australia, Ireland, Saudi Arabia, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Court Refuses to set aside statutory demand based on personal guarantee (Wagner v White)
    2019-02-11

    Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: Connor Pierce, solicitor at Ashfords LLP, examines a High Court judge’s dismissal of an appeal against a deputy registrar’s refusal to set aside a statutory demand made on the appellant, which was based on a personal guarantee he had given the respondent.

    Wagner v White [2018] EWHC 2882 (Ch), [2018] All ER (D) 16 (Nov)

    What are the practical implications of this case?

    The case is a useful authority for statutory demands founded on personal guarantees.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP
    Authors:
    Connor Pierce
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    SHB Realisations Limited (in Liquidation [2018] EWHC 402 (Ch)
    2018-09-28

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Connor Pierce
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Bottoms down for Bargain Booze
    2018-05-14

    Conviviality, the company that owns Bargain Booze, Wine Rack and acts as supplier to Wetherspoons, Slug & Lettuce and many others, entered Administration on 4 April. The company's collapse was sudden and unexpected - as late as 8 March its stock market value was over £550 million, but its share price fell from 301p to 123p in less than 24 hours. This wiped £300 million off the company's value, a drop from which it never recovered.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ashfords LLP
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Ve Vegas Investors IV LLC v Shinners [2018] EWHC 186 (Ch)
    2018-03-16

    The Facts

    This case is the latest twist in the ongoing saga of failed fintech "unicorn" Ve Interactive ("Ve"), who entered Administration in April 2017. Certain of Ve's creditors made an application to replace its Administrators, from Smith & Williamson LLP, with new Administrators from Deloitte.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP
    Authors:
    Connor Pierce
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Current page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days