Stakeholders have until 11 May 2018 to comment on a key part of the new ipso facto regime – the exceptions to the statutory stay on ipso facto clauses in certain categories of contracts and rights.
The new insolvency legislation commencing 1 July 2018 (Treasury Laws Amendment (2017 Enterprise Incentives No. 2) Act 2017) introduces a statutory stay on the exercise of contractual rights arising by reason of certain insolvency trigger events.
In handing over any documents in litigation or Court process, you must assess whether or not the documents have tax relevance.
The Court will closely examine the relevant transactions involving the accounts and form a view – which may be an impressionistic one – as to the likely extent of the interest of each client (or each client group) in those accounts.
The updates to the Guidance Note provide useful guidance on disclosure requirements in the context of the safe harbour reforms but ultimately, the status quo continues.
The ASX has updated its continuous disclosure guidance for entities in financial distress to address uncertainty following the recent introduction of the insolvent trading safe harbour provisions into the Corporations Act. While the ASX has provided useful guidance, unsurprisingly, the position has not changed and directors must continually assess compliance with continuous disclosure requirements.
The Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee (“the Committee”) has endorsed the passing of the Bankruptcy Amendment (Enterprise Incentives) Bill 2017 (“the Bill”) in its report dated 21 March 2018.[1]
Following a landmark decision in the Full Federal Court, employees will retain their priority to payment of their entitlements in a company liquidation, even where the company is a corporate trustee of a trust.
The Queensland Court of Appeal has upheld an appeal by the liquidators of Linc Energy Limited (In Liquidation) (“Linc”) and given full effect to their disclaimer of contaminated mining property and onerous obligations the subject of an environmental protection order (“EPO”) issued by the Queensland Department of Environment and Science (“DES”).[1]
The liquidators were not bound to cause Linc to comply with the EPO from the date of the disclaimer.
3月9日，最高人民法院院长周强在第十三届全国人大一次会议第二次全体会议上作最高人民法院工作报告，重点提及25个在过去五年中具有全国代表性并深具行业参考意义的大案要案，金杜代理的 “重庆钢铁破产重整案”、“东北特钢破产重整案”和“华为诉美国交互数字公司滥用市场支配地位案” 入选报告重点典型案件。
“东北特钢破产重整案：东北特钢重整之后两个月实现扭亏为盈，开启了民营控股的混合所有制运营新模式，为辽宁的国企改革提供了新路径。”
东北特钢破产重整案是近年来破产重整领域内出现的债务总额最高的案件之一，受到社会各方的高度关注。重整计划综合运用留债、一次性现金清偿、债转股等手段，妥善处理了逾七百亿元的债务问题。重整期间尊重当事方的意愿，运用市场的机制和手段，通过公开、公平、公正的程序遴选了重整投资人，得到了债权人的普遍认可。该案具有诸多创新之举，在重整投资人引进、关联公司整体重整、债权清偿方案设计、债转股等方面都进行了创新，为破产重整实践、立法完善和理论研究提供了成功的案例。