Davies Restructuring Review 2021: Issue 2 Contents Emerging Trends for the Short and Long Terms 01 Observations of Q1 2021 03 CCAA Proceedings 03 Business Bankruptcies and Proposals 05 Receiverships 07 A Trend to Watch: From BIA to CCAA 08 Case Example: Kanwal 08 Case Example: EncoreFX 09 A Spotlight on Government Involvement in CCAA Proceedings 09 Goals and Methods of Government Bankruptcy Activism 10 Case Example: Air Canada Inc.

The Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) has denied leave to appeal in the proceedings of Nemaska Lithium Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, Nemaska) under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). In November 2020, the Québec Court of Appeal (QCA) dismissed leave applications from the decision of the Superior Court of Québec (SCQ). In this decision, the SCQ granted, for the first time after a contested hearing, a “reverse vesting order” (RVO).

Lenders often require their borrowers to be “special purpose entities” in real estate transactions. This is a way that lenders can mitigate their bankruptcy risk in the event that the borrower or any of its parent entities file for bankruptcy. In addition, since most real estate financing is non-recourse, lenders require that the borrower is a separate, special purpose entity so that no other property or business will impact the property which is the subject of the underlying loan.

In re Fencepost Productions Inc. that even though an assignment of voting rights provision in a subordination agreement was not enforceable in a bankruptcy proceeding, a subordinated creditor nevertheless was barred from participating in proceedings related to a chapter 11 plan and disclosure statement on the basis that the subordinated creditor lacked prudential standing.

Davies Restructuring Review 2021: Issue 1 Contents The Insolvency Landscape One Year into the COVID-19 Storm 01 Global Outlook on Corporate Insolvency: Lessons from Past Crises?

Although 2020 may be behind us, the economic conditions and lockdowns caused by the COVID-19 pandemic still linger. With the emerging picture for Canada in 2021 looking to largely resemble that of 2020, many are wondering how long struggling businesses and their creditors can hold their breath while waiting for improved cash flows and customer demand.

A recent decision of New York’s highest court potentially strengthens the ability of lenders to bring suits against third parties for participation in a borrower’s breach of single purpose entity/bankruptcy remote loan document covenants.

Canadian Insolvency Trends in 2020: A Pandemic Year in Numbers Contents Introduction 01 Insolvencies in Canada in 2020: The Numbers Explained 02 Bankruptcies and Proposals in a COVID-19 World: A Snapshot 03 The Hardest Hit Sectors 06 Trends in Business Bankruptcies 08 Trends in Business Proposals 09 A Look at Receiverships 10 Developments in CCAA Filings 14 CBCA Section 192 Arrangements 16 Looking Ahead 17 Contributors 18 Key Contacts 19 Canadian Insolvency Trends in 2020 1 Introduction The economic conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic are unprecedented.

A recent decision of New York’s highest court potentially strengthens the ability of lenders to bring suits against third parties for participation in a borrower’s breach of single purpose entity/bankruptcy remote loan document covenants.

Introduction

Parliament passed on July 27, 2020, the Time Limits and Other Periods Act (COVID-19) (Time Limits Act), which we summarized in a previous bulletin. Briefly, the Time Limits Act automatically suspends statutory time limits for federal civil proceedings for six months and grants federal ministers the power to issue orders extending statutory and regulatory time limits in a range of areas.