Fulltext Search
A boost for UK financial services

The U.K. Financial Services and Markets Act 2023

European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Compliance Management, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Trade & Customs, A&O Shearman, Corporate governance, Fintech, Due diligence, Carbon neutrality, Cryptocurrency, Anti-money laundering, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), European Commission, HM Treasury (UK), House of Lords, Bank of England, European Securities and Markets Authority, Prudential Regulation Authority (UK), MiFID, Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EU), Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK), Banking Act 2009 (UK), UK Supreme Court
UK proposals for cryptoasset regulation

The U.K. government has published its much-anticipated proposals for regulating the cryptoasset industry. These proposals, currently in the form of a consultation, will see many (but not all) cryptoasset-related activities being brought within the regulatory perimeter for financial services in the U.K.

European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, White Collar Crime, A&O Shearman, Blockchain, Crowdfunding, Bitcoin, Due diligence, Cryptocurrency, Financial Services Compensation Scheme, Distributed ledger, ESG, Cybersecurity, Anti-money laundering, Central counterparties, Decentralised finance, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), House of Lords, FTX, MiFID, Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK), Markets in Cryptoassets Regulation (EU)
Bad facts, good law? Important new circuit-level guidance on Chapter 15 recognition and enforcement of foreign reorganization orders

Introduction

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Debt, Title 11 of the US Code, Fifth Circuit
Supreme Court limits reach of non-Article III courts’ jurisdiction

On June 23, 2011, the US Supreme Court issued a narrowly-divided decision in Stern v. Marshall, limiting Bankruptcy Court jurisdiction over certain types of claims. The Court found that while the Bankruptcy Court was statutorily authorized to enter final judgment on a tortious interference counterclaim (as a core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(C)), it was not constitutionally authorized to do so.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Tortious interference, Standard of review, Constitutionality, US Constitution, Article III US Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Beware of creditors bearing gifts: the Second Circuit’s recent decision in In re: DBSD North America, Inc. casts significant doubt on “gift” plans

On February 7, 2011 the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued its eagerly awaited opinion in the consolidated appealIn re: DBSD North America, Inc., Docket Nos. 10-1175, 10-1201, 10-1352, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 27007.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Federal Reporter, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit