Fulltext Search

This week’s TGIF considers a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Forex Capital Trading Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Invesus Group Limited [2024] NSWSC 867). Justice Ball determined that admission of a proof of debt by a liquidator was not akin to a judgment or settlement, and that such an admission did not create a new liability of the company.

浅析新形势下上市公司并购重组方向与路径——以上市公司在子公司融资后实施并购重组之案例为视角

引言

2024年3月15日,中国证券监督管理委员会(以下简称“证监会”)发布《关于加强上市公司监管的意见(试行)》,明确“支持上市公司通过并购重组提升投资价值”,鼓励“上市公司综合运用各类工具提升对长期投资的吸引力,积极吸引长期机构投资者”,并提出“多措并举活跃并购重组市场,鼓励上市公司综合运用股份、现金、定向可转债等工具实施并购重组、注入优质资产”

2024年4月12日,国务院发布《关于加强监管防范风险推动资本市场高质量发展的若干意见》,原则性提出“严把发行上市准入关”“严格上市公司持续监管”“大力推动中长期资金入市,持续壮大长期投资力量”等指导意见,进一步提高IPO标准,严格再融资审核把关,鼓励上市公司聚焦主业,综合运用并购重组、股权激励等方式提高发展质量,倡导长期资金入市,鼓励长期资金投资。

In a recent decision of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (In the matter of Pacific Plumbing Group Pty Limited (in liquidation) [2024] NSWSC 525), Justice Black determined that a payment made by a third party was not an unfair preference because the payment did not diminish assets available to creditors.

Key Takeaways

The Federal Court in Morgan, in the matter of Traditional Values Management Limited (in liq)[2024] FCA 74, approved an abridged process that allowed the liquidator to admit debts of a group of unsecured creditors without requiring a formal proof of debt.

Key Takeaways

In this week’s TGIF, we consider the Court of Appeal’s decision in Anchorage Capital Master Offshore Ltd v Sparkes [2023] NSWCA 88 and the challenges faced by lenders in accepting representations as to solvency and the financial position of borrowers.

Key takeaways

This week’s, TGIF considers the Court of Appeal’s decision in Westgem Investments Pty Ltd v Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd [2022] WASCA 132, handed down on 4 November 2022 in favour of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia Ltd and Lloyds Banking Group (Financiers).

Key takeaways

This week’s TGIF considers a recent case where the Supreme Court of Queensland rejected a director’s application to access an executory contract of sale entered into by receivers and managers on the basis it was not a ‘financial record’

Key Takeaways

This week’s TGIF looks at the decision of the Federal Court of Australia in Donoghue v Russells (A Firm)[2021] FCA 798 in which Mr Donoghue appealed a decision to make a sequestration order which was premised on him ‘carrying on business in Australia' for the purpose of section 43(1)(b)(iii) of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (Act).

Key Takeaways