Fulltext Search
BTI v Sequana - directors must continue to be aware of creditors' interests on the road to insolvency

The UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in BTI v Sequana on 5 October 2022, unanimously dismissing the appeal from the 2019 Court of Appeal decision and confirming how directors duties ought to be applied when a company is in the zone of insolvency. Although decisions of the UK Supreme Court are not binding upon the jurisdictions in which Ogier practises law, it will nevertheless be highly persuasive and influence the approach taken in the offshore jurisdictions that Ogier advises upon.

United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Insolvency, UK Supreme Court
Frozen in time: do limitation periods apply to claims against Cayman companies in liquidation?

Introduction
Facts
Decision
Comment


Introduction

Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ogier
Frozen in time: do limitation periods apply to claims against Cayman companies in liquidation?

Introduction

Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Ogier, Time bar/limitation period
Frozen in time: do limitation periods apply to claims against Cayman companies in liquidation?

Legal claims can only be brought within the applicable limitation period prescribed by the Limitation Act (1996 Revision). A defendant to any claim that is time-barred has a complete defence. Prior to the recent decision ofRitchie Capital Management LLC et al (Ritchie) v Lancelot Investors Fund Ltd (Lancelot) and General Electric Company (GE), it had been generally understood that the Cayman approach to claims against companies in liquidation would follow the English position on the issue of limitation.

Cayman Islands, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier
Court of Appeal holds that anti-deprivation principle does not apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency

The anti-deprivation principle provides that “there cannot be a valid contract that a man’s property shall remain his until his bankruptcy, and, on the happening of that event, go over to someone else, and be taken away from his creditors”.

United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Interest, Joint venture, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
Court of Appeal reverses earlier decision and holds that anti-deprivation principle does not apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency

In September 2009 we reported on the first instance decision in Butters and ors v BBC Worldwide Ltd and ors, accessible here in which the Court held that contractual provisions in a joint venture agreement taken together with termination provisions in a licence of IP rights were void since the effect of those provisions on insolvency was to deprive creditors' access to assets and therefore contrary

United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Joint venture, Subsidiary, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
IP licences and insolvency - deprivation principle held to apply to provisions relating to the termination of an IP licence on insolvency

In Butters and ors v BBC Worldwide Ltd and ors, decided on 20 August 2009, the Court held that contractual provisions in a joint venture agreement taken together with termination provisions in a licence of IP rights were void since the effect of those provisions on insolvency was to deprive creditors access to assets and therefore contrary to public policy in the light of insolvency laws.

BUSINESS IMPACT

United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Intellectual Property, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Joint venture, Public limited company, Prejudice, Subsidiary