Fulltext Search
A boost for UK financial services

The U.K. Financial Services and Markets Act 2023

European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Compliance Management, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Trade & Customs, A&O Shearman, Corporate governance, Fintech, Due diligence, Carbon neutrality, Cryptocurrency, Anti-money laundering, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), European Commission, HM Treasury (UK), House of Lords, Bank of England, European Securities and Markets Authority, Prudential Regulation Authority (UK), MiFID, Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EU), Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK), Banking Act 2009 (UK), UK Supreme Court
UK proposals for cryptoasset regulation

The U.K. government has published its much-anticipated proposals for regulating the cryptoasset industry. These proposals, currently in the form of a consultation, will see many (but not all) cryptoasset-related activities being brought within the regulatory perimeter for financial services in the U.K.

European Union, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, White Collar Crime, A&O Shearman, Blockchain, Crowdfunding, Bitcoin, Due diligence, Cryptocurrency, Financial Services Compensation Scheme, Distributed ledger, ESG, Cybersecurity, Anti-money laundering, Central counterparties, Decentralised finance, Financial Conduct Authority (UK), House of Lords, FTX, MiFID, Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (UK), Markets in Cryptoassets Regulation (EU)
The New Duty of Good Faith in Canadian Insolvency Proceedings

Canada’s two main insolvency and restructuring statutes, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) and the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) were recently amended to include a new duty of good faith on the part of all “interested persons” involved in an insolvency proceeding. The amendments do not define “good faith” or “interested persons”. Although requiring all participants in an insolvency proceeding to act in good faith may be a laudable objective, the statutory amendments are problematic.

Canada, Quebec, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bennett Jones LLP, Debtor, Due diligence
No Deemed Trust for Unremitted GST and HST Post-Bankruptcy

In a unanimous decision issued November 8, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada granted the appeal of the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada v Callidus Capital Corp, 2017 FCA 162.

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Bennett Jones LLP, Bankruptcy, Excise, Secured creditor, Canada Revenue Agency, Supreme Court of Canada, Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
No Deemed Trust for Unremitted GST and HST Post-Bankruptcy

In a unanimous decision issued November 8, 2018, the Supreme Court of Canada granted the appeal of the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in Canada v Callidus Capital Corp, 2017 FCA 162.

Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Bennett Jones LLP, Excise, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Canada Revenue Agency, Supreme Court of Canada, Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)
Super-priority claims for professional services related to restructuring plans and debt restructuring agreements?

With two decisions (No. 1895/2018 and No. 1896/2018), both filed on 25 January 2018, the Court of Cassation reached opposite conclusions in the two different situations

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Debt restructuring, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
De facto partnerships can be declared bankrupt even if partners are corporations

The Constitutional Court (6 December 2017) confirmed that Art. 147, para. 5, of the Italian Bankruptcy Law does not violate the Constitution as long as it is interpreted in a broad sense

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Contracts remain in force in amministrazione straordinaria even after they are expired ?

With the decision No. 1195 of 18 January 2018, the Court of Cassation ruled on the powers of the extraordinary commissioner to require performance of pending contracts and on the treatment of the relevant claims of the suppliers

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
The bankruptcy receiver can continue utilities contracts, but is not bound to pay in full previous claims based on such contracts

The Court of Cassation with a decision of 25 September 2017, No. 22274 confirms that Art. 74 of the Italian Bankruptcy Law provides a special rule, which does not apply to cases to which it is not explicitly extended

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
Claw-back of a corporate spin-off (Art. 2506 of the Italian Civil Code)?

With the decision No. 1649 of 19 September 2017 the Court of Appeals of Catania followed the interpretation according to which a spin-off is not subject to the avoiding powers of a bankruptcy receiver

The case

Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, Liquidation