Fulltext Search
New German Law on Close-Out Netting in the Event of Insolvency

On 16 December 2016 an act amending the insolvency laws applicable to financial derivatives transactions passed the Bundesrat (the second chamber of the German legislature). The new law was finalised only six months after the German Federal Court of Justice passed its landmark judgment that held a netting provision based on the German Master Agreement for Financial Derivatives Transactions to be partially ineffective in the event of insolvency.

Germany, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reed Smith LLP
Contractual Close-Out Netting Ineffective in the Event of Insolvency

In a decision of 9 June 2016, the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, "BGH") has ruled that the determination of the close-out amount in a netting provision based on the German Master Agreement for Financial Derivatives Transactions (Rahmenvertrag für Finanztermingeschäfte or DRV) is not legally effective in the event of insolvency to the extent that it deviates from section 104 of the German Insolvency Code.

Germany, Company & Commercial, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Choice of law, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
Exit lenders liable for conversion where distributions contravene credit agreement

Prudential Insurance Company of America v. WestLB AG, 961 N.Y.S. 2d 360 (2012)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Credit (finance), Collateral (finance)
Seventh Circuit rules rejection of executory trademark license does not terminate the license, creates a split of authority

Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, 686 F.3d 372 (7th Cir. 2012)

CASE SNAPSHOT

In a matter of first impression in the Seventh Circuit, the court held that a chapter 7 trustee’s rejection of an executory contract did not terminate the trademark license contained therein.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Seventh Circuit
Subtenant retains possessory rights under section 365(h) despite explicit free and clear section 363(f) sale

In re Zota Petroleums, LLC, 482 B.R. 154 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2012)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Reed Smith LLP
Determining whether a chapter 11 plan is unconfirmable without a confirmation hearing

In re American Capital Equipment, LLC, 688 F.3d 145 (3d Cir. 2012)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Discovery, Due process, Leveraged buyout, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
Substantive consolidation order not automatically retroactive absent language to the contrary

Giuliano v. Shorenstein Company, LLC (In re Sunset Aviation, Inc.), Adv. No. 11- 50965, Bankr. No. 09-10778, 2011 WL 4002429 (Bankr. D. Del. Sept. 7, 2011)  

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Limited liability company, Ex post facto law, United States bankruptcy court, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware
Cross-affiliate netting provision in ISDA swap agreement is not enforceable against the debtor

In re Lehman Brothers Inc., Bankr. Case No. 08-01420 (JMP) (SIPA), 2011 WL 4553015 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2011)  

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, UBS, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
Split in courts continues—private stock purchase payments not protected by Section 546 safe harbor

Geltzer v. Mooney (In re MacMenamin’s Grill Ltd.), Adv. Case. No. 09-8266, Bankr. Case No. 08-23660, 2011 WL 1549056 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Apr. 21, 2011)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Security (finance), Fraud, Safe harbor (law), Writ, Leveraged buyout, Systemic risk, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
In a case of first impression, the Third Circuit holds that discounted cash flow analysis may be used as a ‘commercially reasonable determinant of value’ with respect to repurchase agreement acceleration under section 562

Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank New York Branch, f.k.a. Calyon New York Branch v. American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc. (In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc.), No. 09- 4295, 2011 WL 522945 (3d Cir. February 16, 2011)

CASE SNAPSHOT

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Investment banking, Liquidation, Cashflow, Default (finance), Market value, Valuation (finance), Discounted cash flow, Westlaw, Third Circuit