Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    DIP financing guarantees: impediments and approvals
    2009-07-21

    Debtor-in-possession financing (“DIP financing”), which is new short-term financing obtained by an insolvent company after the commencement of an insolvency proceeding, is a recurring theme for two primary reasons. First, insolvent companies are generally desperate for an immediate infusion of cash to sustain operations. Second, creditors will usually provide such financing only on a super-priority basis, jumping ahead of existing secured creditors of the insolvent company.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Credit (finance), Surety, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Consideration, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Evan Cobb
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    The monitor’s power and authority in a CCAA claims process
    2009-07-23

    Although the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) provides scant guidance, it is a well established procedure in a CCAA proceeding for the Court to order a claims process and to delegate powers to review creditors claims to a CCAA Monitor. Recognizing the gaps in the legislation, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently reviewed and clarified the basis of a Monitor’s authority to conduct a claims bar process in the CCAA restructuring of ScoZinc Ltd.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Nova Scotia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Unsecured debt, Interest, Stakeholder (corporate), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    David Ward
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Holiday cheer - Alberta court grants rare extension to unpaid supplier
    2009-06-29

    Unpaid suppliers are generally unsecured in liquidation proceedings. A supplier can elevate its unsecured claim by taking security from the debtor or modifying its supply contract by inserting an effective title retention clause. The supplier may also rely on the BIA unpaid supplier provision to assert a super-priority for the return of its goods.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Goldman Sachs
    Authors:
    Harvey Garman
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Availability of cross-border guarantees for DIP financing in CCAA cases
    2009-06-29

    In a series of cases in 2009 culminating in the decision of the Honourable Mr. Justice Morawetz in Re Indalex Limited (“Indalex”), the CCAA Courts have considered the appropriateness of approving the granting of a guarantee in connection with a cross-border DIP facility. This issue has been at the forefront – with varying results – in a number of recent CCAA cases in which DIP financing was dependent on the CCAA debtor providing a secured guarantee of the obligations of the parent or affiliate company’s DIP financing in its own Chapter 11 case.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Precondition, Prejudice, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    The monitor’s power to revise claims after a claims bar date
    2009-06-30

    In Re ScoZinc Ltd., 2009 NSSC 136 the monitor appointed under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) brought a motion for directions on whether it had the authority to allow the revision of a claim after the claim’s bar date, but before the date set for the monitor to complete its assessment of claims.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    David W. Mann , David LeGeyt
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Supplier's rights under S. 81.1 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act expanded
    2009-04-29

    Section 81.1 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) grants a temporary super priority to suppliers who provided goods to a bankrupt purchaser or where a receiver has been appointed in relation to the purchaser. The section requires the supplier to provide a written demand to the purchaser and allows the supplier to repossess the goods within thirty days of the date of the delivery of goods.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Goldman Sachs, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    David LeGeyt , David W. Mann
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Does an execution creditor have priority over unsecured creditors in an insolvency?
    2009-02-18

    An Ontario Court recently confirmed that an execution creditor does not have priority over the unsecured creditors of a debtor upon the insolvency of the debtor even if the judgment creditor is then holding funds of the debtor which it has garnisheed.

    In February 2008, the Superior Court of Justice – Ontario granted Cotton Ginny Inc., CG Operations Limited ("H/O"), CG Operations I Limited and CG Operations II Limited, protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Capital punishment, Preferred stock, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Approval of cross border DIP financing facilities
    2009-02-27

    In Re Intertan Canada Ltd. (2009), WL 181688 (Ont. S.C.J. [Commercial]), 2009 CarswellOnt 324 [Re Intertan], Morawetz J denied the approval of an amended DIP financing agreement under CCAA proceedings which was granted under the Chapter 11 proceedings in the United States.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Retail, Unsecured debt, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Constitutional amendment, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Risks in doing business in a Canadian reorganization
    2009-03-25

    As the pace of restructuring activity in Canada continues to accelerate (see the partial listing below), international creditors should be aware that there are credit risks in doing business with a company that is restructuring in either of Canada's two restructuring systems. (These are, briefly, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act which is generally used for small to medium sized restructurings and the Companies Creditors' Arrangement Act which is generally used for large cases and resembles proceedings under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Supply chain, Liquidation, Title 11 of the US Code, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Bruce Leonard
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    New pension contribution priorities under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act
    2008-11-24

    The priorities of some pension claims on bankruptcy and receivership changed as a result of amendments effective July 8, 2008 to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act R.S.C. (Canada) (the “BIA”).  

    Priority Before the Amendments

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fasken, Wage, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Income tax, Liquidation, Unemployment benefits, Secured creditor, US Federal Government, Canada Pension Plan Act 1985, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Fasken

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Current page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days