Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The new UK insolvency regime for investment firms
    2011-08-24

    In this DechertOnPoint, we summarise HM Treasury’s work to establish effective resolution arrangements for investment banks and firms, which resulted in the introduction of a special administration regime (“SAR”) earlier this year.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dechert LLP, Investment banking, Investment company, HM Treasury (UK)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    HMRC clamping down on owners of bankrupt businesses
    2011-09-05

    HMRC is leading an increasingly tough stance against owners of businesses that have failed to pay their taxes before going bankrupt, says City law firm Wedlake Bell.

    Figures from the Insolvency Service reveal that in the last year Bankruptcy Restriction Orders (or equivalent undertakings) were obtained against 443 bankrupts because of neglect of their business - a majority of which were alleged to have consistently failed to pay taxes to HMRC. This was an increase of 21% on last year and concern actions taken against sole traders and partnerships (Year ending March 31).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Wedlake Bell, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Gambling, Debt, Subscription business model, HM Revenue and Customs (UK), The Independent
    Authors:
    Edward Starling
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Wedlake Bell
    Collective redundancy – representative claims
    2011-09-05

    Independent Insurance Co Limited (In Provisional Liquidation) v Aspinall and another UKEAT/0051/11

    Independent Insurance Company - IIC- went into provisional liquidation in June 2001.  Half of its employees were made redundant including Mr Aspinall and Mrs O’Callaghan.  They issued proceedings claiming a protective award when IIC failed to comply with its collective consultation obligations, consult with employee representatives or arrange for necessary elections.   

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Steptoe LLP, Employment tribunal, Public consultations, Trade union, Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Election, US House of Representatives, Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Steptoe LLP
    Beware the blessings of technology: email exchange may create a binding UK contract
    2011-09-14

    Recent remarks by the English High Court in the insolvency case Green (Liquidator of Stealth Construction Limited) -v- Ireland [2011] EWHC 1305 (Ch) suggest that in some circumstances, and at least in the context of fast-moving real property transactions, an exchange of emails may well satisfy the requisite formalities for creation of a binding and enforceable contract.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Liquidator (law), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Raymond L. Sweigart
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    What's in a name? Some guidance on prohibited names
    2011-09-14

    Sections 216 and 217 of the Insolvency Act impose draconian sanctions on directors of liquidated companies who reuse "prohibited names". Prohibited names are names that are identical to, or "suggest an association with", a company that has gone into liquidation and of which they were previously directors. The sanctions include criminal penalties and personal liability for debts. It has always been difficult for advisers to confidently advise directors whether a proposed name for a new company would be a prohibited name, given the vague nature of the phrase "suggest an association".

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, MacRoberts LLP, Debt, Voluntary association, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Alan Meek , John Reid
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP
    Financial restructurings of foreign companies through English schemes of arrangement
    2011-09-20

    Lending to a foreign company? If you choose English law to govern your facility documents and provide for the English court to have exclusive jurisdiction, an English scheme may be a viable means of restructuring the debt later, if the need arises.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Conflict of laws, Debt, Consent, Liquidation, Exclusive jurisdiction, Secured loan, Constitutional amendment, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Susan Moore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Recovery and Resolution Plans – breaking up the banks by stealth?
    2011-09-21

    Summary

    FSA is consulting on the need for certain financial services firms to prepare and maintain Recovery and Resolution Plans (RRPs) and in addition for some of these firms, and others, to make further preparations for their investment client money and custody assets (CMA) holdings.

    Why now?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Legal personality, Security (finance), Dividends, Market liquidity, Investment company, Subsidiary, Building society, Credit rating, HM Treasury (UK), FSA, Bank of England, Banking Act 2009 (UK)
    Authors:
    Matthew Hodgson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Forfeiture of assets on insolvency: “it’s yours until you go bust”
    2011-09-22

    Belmont Park Investments Pty Limited v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Limited and another [2011] UKSC 38.

    The Supreme Court has clarified the extent to which it is possible for a contract to provide for a company or individual to lose assets on insolvency.  

    Summary

    Well-established rules are unchanged, so landlords can still forfeit leases on insolvency. In other cases, if a transaction is entered into in good faith and for valid commercial reasons, it is likely to be upheld.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kennedys Law LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Patent infringement, Ex parte, Good faith, Bad faith, Asset forfeiture, Parent company, Pro rata, Supreme Court of the United States, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Steven Fennell , Dino Paganuzzi
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Kennedys Law LLP
    Lehman derivatives transaction did not run afoul of fraudulent conveyance rules, says UKSC
    2011-09-29

    In 2002 a European subsidiary of Lehman Brothers created a complicated synthetic debt structure called Dante, which was intended to provide credit insurance for another subsidiary, LBSF, against credit events affecting certain reference entities, the obligations of which formed the reference portfolio. A special purpose vehicle issued notes to investors, the proceeds of which were used to purchase collateral which vested in a trust. The issuer entered into a swap with LBSF under which LBSF received the income on the collateral and paid the issuer the amount of interest due to noteholders.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Collateral (finance), Interest, Swap (finance), Debt, Good faith, Common law, Default (finance), Subsidiary, Payment protection insurance, Lehman Brothers, Trustee, UK Supreme Court
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
    The effect of insolvency on a charterparty
    2011-08-08

    Thor Maalouf, an Associate in the London Shipping Group, considers some of the issues which may arise where a party to a charterparty becomes insolvent.

    INSOLVENCY ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH TO JUSTIFY TERMINATION

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Breach of contract, Debt, Liquidator (law), Charter-party, Chartering (shipping), Bankruptcy discharge
    Authors:
    Thor Maalouf
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 403
    • Page 404
    • Page 405
    • Page 406
    • Current page 407
    • Page 408
    • Page 409
    • Page 410
    • Page 411
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days