Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Clarifying COMI: locating a debtor's centre of main interests
    2012-11-14

    On July 6, 2012, in Lightsquared LP (Re),1 the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the "Ontario Court"), released reasons that clarify the criteria for the identification of the centre of main interest ("COMI") of an applicant seeking recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings as "Foreign Main Proceedings" pursuant to Section 46 of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA").2

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, UNCITRAL, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Adam C. Maerov , Andrei Pascu
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    DVD manufacturer Cinram sold to Najafi Companies under <i>CCAA</i> protection
    2012-07-04

    Cinram International Income Fund (TSX: CRW.UN), a Canadian company that is one of the world’s largest providers of multi-media products, has agreed to sell virtually all of its assets and businesses in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Germany to Najafi Companies after obtaining creditor protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Canada’s Cinram manufacturing files in CCAA
    2012-07-05

    Cinram International Income Fund (TSX: CRW.UN), a Canadian company that is one of the world’s largest providers of multi-media products, has sought and obtained protection under the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). The company proposes to sell its assets and businesses in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and Germany to Najafi Companies.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Digital distribution, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Checkmate: Third Circuit holds automatic stay bars participation in U.K. pension proceedings
    2012-01-19

    A recent decision by the Third Circuit in the Nortel Group bankruptcy reinforces the worldwide reach of the automatic stay and the narrow scope of the police power exception under section 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.  In Nortel Networks, Inc. v. Trustee of Nortel Networks U.K. Pension Plan, No. 11-1895 (3d Cir. Dec. 29, 2011), the Third Circuit held that the automatic stay barred U.K. pension claimants from participating in U.K. proceedings meant to determine the debtors’ liability for their affiliate’s pension funding shortfalls.

    Filed under:
    Canada, United Kingdom, USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bracewell LLP, Bankruptcy, Market liquidity, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Location:
    Canada, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Bracewell LLP
    U.S. bankruptcy court bars tolling of fraudulent conveyance look-back period
    2012-02-02

    A U.S. bankruptcy judge in Delaware has held that the two-year "look-back" period in which a transfer occurring within two years of the bankruptcy petition filing date may be avoided, under Section 548 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, cannot be equitably tolled. After some inconsistent orders about whether the courts may broaden the look-back period, this decision should give greater certainty to lenders when evaluating their exposure upon the commencement of a bankruptcy case by a borrower.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Torys LLP, Debtor, Statute of limitations, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alison D. Bauer , Darien G. Leung
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Torys LLP
    Determining the centre of main interest in corporate group CCAA filings
    2011-09-14

    A number of commentators have written articles about Part IV of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), which deals with recognizing and enforcing foreign insolvency proceedings, however little has been written about the treatment of corporate groups in this context. Part IV of the CCAA deals with entities on an individual basis, and how to deal with corporate groups is not well addressed in international insolvency legislation.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Debtor, Interest, Secured creditor, General Electric, Novartis v. Union of India & Others, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, Ontario Superior Court of Justice, US District Court for District of Massachusetts
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Heenan Blaikie LLP
    Limitation of Chapter 15 jurisdiction thwarts foreign funds’ claims against investors
    2011-09-22

    U.S. bankruptcy courts may be advantageous forums for foreign liquidators to organize large scale lawsuits; however, courts will impose limitations.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Torys LLP, Liquidator (law), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Torys LLP
    The CCAA scene: recent and notable - June 2011
    2011-06-09

    Adananc

    On February 28, 2011, Adanac Molybdenum Corporation announced that it successfully implemented its plan of compromise and arrangement and emerged from CCAA protection. It was announced that, on implementation, Adanac’s outstanding common shares were consolidated on a 150 to 1 basis with 24,698,888 post-consolidation common shares issued to creditors.

    Adanac owns the Ruby Creek Project, located in northwest British Columbia.

    Ambrilia Biopharma

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Medical device, Subsidiary, Ericsson, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Alex Tarantino
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Franchise agreements may be assigned to another franchisee without consent upon bankruptcy
    2011-06-16

    A recent Alberta appellate decision establishes that a trustee in bankruptcy may sell a franchise agreement to a third party, in spite of objections by the franchisor, under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). The Alberta Court of Appeal’s decision in Ford Motor Company of Canada Ltd v Welcome Ford Sales Ltd contains three important messages for franchisors:

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Consent, Legal burden of proof, Franchise agreement, Ford Motor Company, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Jane Langford
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    The recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings
    2011-01-19

    In the Ontario case of Re Xerium Technologies Inc., the Superior Court of Justice (the “Ontario Court”) was asked to recognize an order made by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “U.S. Court”) approving a prepackaged plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) of the debtors, Xerium Technologies Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, “Xerium”), made under Chapter 11 of the United States Code (the “U.S. Bankruptcy Code”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Conflict of laws, Surety, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Liquidation, Supplemental jurisdiction, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Current page 18
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days