Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    SEC reporting after a bankruptcy filing - Part I
    2013-06-06

    Your good client Michael Bluth calls you from the Delaware bankruptcy court. Now that his family’s business, The Bluth Company, has filed for bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and his late nights with DIP lenders and our bankruptcy colleagues have come to a temporary pause, Michael’s ready to turn back to his typical day-to-day job running his business.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Form 8-K, US Securities and Exchange Commission, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alexander F. Cohen , Kirk A. Davenport II , Joel H. Trotter
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    Financial services update, vol. 8, number 21
    2013-06-03
    In a case that should alarm secured creditors who thought they could lawfully exercise their secured creditor rights to foreclose on collateral, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld sanctions against a secured creditor that did exactly that. In 2006, the State Employees Federal Credit Union ("SEFCU") made a loan to Mr. Weber, secured by Mr. Weber’s pick-up truck (the principles in this case apply equally in the corporate finance world). After Mr. Weber defaulted on the loan in 2009, SEFCU legally repossessed Mr.
    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Secured creditor
    Authors:
    Susan Berkwitt
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    9th Circuit: finding of common strategy needed for common interest doctrine
    2013-06-05

    In In re Village at Lakeridge, LLC, BAP Nos. 12-1456, 12-1474 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Apr. 5, 2013), the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Ninth Circuit clarified that, in order to apply the common interest doctrine, a trial court must make a finding that the parties expressly or implicitly agreed to participate in a joint legal strategy. In this case, secured creditor, US Bank, deposed the sole unsecured creditor, Rabkin.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jenner & Block LLP, Interest, Secured creditor, Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    David M. Greenwald
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jenner & Block LLP
    We greet a new Aredia-Zometa dismissal with abated breath
    2013-06-05

    You have almost certainly heard the phrase, “Waiting with bated breath.” As in: we awaited the Red Wedding scene in Game of Thrones with bated breath. Or: we greeted the Drug and Device Law Son's diploma ceremony with bated breath. (The former was impressive and awful. As one friend wrote on his Facebook wall, if you had a favorite character in GoT, maybe now you don't.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Estoppel
    Authors:
    Stephen J. McConnell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    SCOTUS lets stand security interest in proceeds of bankruptcy transfer of FCC license
    2013-06-05

    On May 13, 2013, the Supreme Court declined to review the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit1 that had held that a security interest may extend to the “proceeds” of the future transfer of a license holder’s interest in its Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) broadcast license and that, under applicable state law, the security interest attached upon execution of the security agreement, despite the fact that the parties did not contemplate a transfer of the license at that time.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, Debtor, Federal Communications Commission (USA), Title 11 of the US Code, Supreme Court of the United States, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Chérie R. Kiser , Joel H. Levitin , Richard A. Stieglitz Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP
    An identifiable risk to collateral property that is used in the marijuana business
    2013-06-05

    The legalization under state law of the marijuana business in Colorado through Amendment 20 (medical marijuana) and Amendment 64 (recreational marijuana) (Amendment 20 and Amendment 64 shall be referred to collectively as the "Colorado Amendments") raises serious issues for banks whose customers or borrowers are involved in the marijuana business in Colorado. The Colorado Amendments do not affect federal law that defines marijuana as a Class 1 controlled substance.

    Filed under:
    USA, Colorado, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Sherman & Howard LLC, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Cannabis, Controlled substance, Secured creditor, Controlled Substances Act 1971 (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sherman & Howard LLC
    Ninth Circuit holds that debt can be recharacterized as equity
    2013-06-05

    The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently resolved a split within the circuit when it held that a bankruptcy court has the power to recharacterize debt as equity.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Debt, Debt restructuring, Title 11 of the US Code, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    American Airlines CEO Tom Horton one step closer to free lifetime travel. Oh, and $20 million
    2013-06-06

    American Airlines’ CEO, Tom Horton, moved one step closer to receiving the $20 million severance payment he’s negotiated with the bankrupt airline.  On Tuesday, the bankruptcy judge hearing American’s case allowed the payment to stay in the airline’s disclosure statement (approval of the statement is a predicate step to ultimately “reorganizing” and exiting bankruptcy).  The approval c

    Filed under:
    USA, Aviation, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Zuckerman Spaeder LLP, Severance package, American Airlines
    Authors:
    William A. Schreiner, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Zuckerman Spaeder LLP
    Delaware bankruptcy court confirms the validity of plan support agreements
    2013-05-31

    Chapter 11 debtors and sophisticated creditor and/or shareholder constituencies are increasingly using postpetition plan support agreements (sometimes referred to as “lockup” agreements) to set forth prenegotiated terms of a chapter 11 plan prior to the filing of a disclosure statement and a plan with the bankruptcy court. Under such lockup agreements, if the debtor ultimately proposes a chapter 11 plan that includes prenegotiated terms, signatories are typically obligated to vote in favor of the plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Balance sheet, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    George R. Howard , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    In re MDC Systems, Inc.: 502(b)(6) “surrendered” to common sense
    2013-05-31

    Section 502(b)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code caps the amount of a lessor’s claim against a debtor-lessee for damages arising from the termination of a real property lease. The statutory cap is calculated according to a formula that considers, among other things, the date on which the lessor “repossessed” or the debtor-lessee “surrendered” the leased property. Because those terms are not defined in the Bankruptcy Code, however, courts disagree as to whether state or federal law should determine their meanings for the purpose of calculating the allowed amount of the lessor’s claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor
    Authors:
    Jordan M. Schneider
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 869
    • Page 870
    • Page 871
    • Page 872
    • Current page 873
    • Page 874
    • Page 875
    • Page 876
    • Page 877
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days