Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Grayson Consulting, Inc. v. Wachovia Securities, LLC, f/k/a First Union Securities, Inc., et al. (In re Derivium Capital, LLC), Case No. 12-1518 (4th Cir. May 24, 2013)
    2013-06-07

    On a matter of first impression, the Fourth Circuit issued an opinion in the Derivium Capital, LLC bankruptcy case on May 24, 2013,1 affirming the District Court’s ruling that Grayson Consulting Inc. ("Grayson"), the chapter 7 Trustee’s assignee, could not avoid as fraudulent conveyances Wachovia’s2 commissions, fees, and margin interest payments because those payments were protected from recovery by the safe harbor of United States Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") section 546(e).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Interest, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Ackerly , Tyler P. Brown , Shannon E. Daily , Tara L. Elgie , Jarrett L. Hale , Jason W. Harbour
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    Delaware court provides critical guidance as to the commercial reasonableness of a UCC Article 9 foreclosure sale
    2013-06-07

    Secured lenders often resort to non-judicial foreclosure sales of personal property upon a borrower’s default. Article 9, Part 6 of the Uniform Commercial Code requires that every aspect of such a sale must be commercially reasonable. However, the courts have historically provided little guidance as to what exactly constitutes a commercially reasonable sale. Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. H.I.G. Capital, Inc., C.A. No. 3601-CS (Del.Ch. Apr.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Debtor, Personal property, Foreclosure, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
    Bankruptcy court permits Patriot to modify union agreements
    2013-06-10

    Patriot Coal became the third major debtor in the last year to modify benefits or reject a CBA under sections 1113 and 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code. Following similar rulings in the Hostess and AMR Corporation bankruptcies, Bankruptcy Judge Kathy Surratt-States on May 29, 2013, granted Patriot authorization to modify agreements with the United Mine Workers of America and reject union CBAs.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    In re East End Development, LLC
    2013-06-10

    In In re East End Development, LLC, 2013 WL 1820182 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Apr.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor
    Authors:
    Kevin M. Hembree
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Federal banking authorities approve nonbank liquidation rule and extension for foreign banks on pushout rule
    2013-06-10

    In a busy day's work, on June 5, 2013, the FDIC and the Federal Reserve issued two new rules under Dodd-Frank impacting both domestic and foreign financial institutions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Bass Berry & Sims PLC, Liquidation, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Federal Reserve (USA), US House Committee on Agriculture, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Authors:
    M. Jason Hale , Anthony J. McFarland
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bass Berry & Sims PLC
    When Rule B attachment will not help
    2013-06-11

    Since 2008, the shipping market (in particular, the bulker market) has been badly affected by a decreased demand for shipping, largely due to the global financial crisis. To date, the shipping market is struggling, and claims for unpaid charter hire continue to surface along with the traditional assortment of other claims that arise between contracting parties.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Blank Rome LLP, Admiralty law, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    William R. Bennett III
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Blank Rome LLP
    Providing employees with notice of layoffs in Chapter 11 cases
    2013-06-11

    The "WARN Act" (Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act) requires that larger employers provide 60 days' notice in advance of plant closings or other mass layoffs. This has long been in conflict with bankruptcy practice. A recent Fifth Circuit decision, In re Flexible Flyer Liquidating Trust, 2013 WL 586823, at *1 (5th Cir. Feb. 11, 2013), confirms that exceptions to the WARN Act apply in bankruptcy and interprets these exceptions more broadly than previous decisions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, BakerHostetler, Hedge funds, Walmart, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA), Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Amy E. Vanderwal , George Klidonas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    BakerHostetler
    Any port in a storm: safe harbor for intermediaries in the Second Circuit
    2013-06-11

    Navigating the most recent leg in the Quebecor regatta, the Second Circuit affirmed the judgment of the district court and ruled that prepetition transfers made in connection with a securities contract may qualify for safe harbor from avoidance actions under section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code—even if the transferee is a mere “conduit” or “intermediary” financial institution. In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc. (Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Quebecor World (USA) Inc. v. American United Life Insurance Co.), No. 12-4270-bk (2d Cir. June 10, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bracewell LLP, Safe harbor (law), Enron, Second Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bracewell LLP
    Unfair trade practices exclusion inapplicable to claims arising under fair debt collection statutes, statutory damages covered
    2013-06-11

    The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania has held that an E&O policy issued to a now-bankrupt credit counseling company did not cover claims arising under unfair trade practices statutes, but did cover claims arising under fair debt collection statutes. Hrobuchak v. Fed. Ins. Co., 2013 WL 2291875 (M.D. Pa. May 24, 2013). The court also held that carve-outs from the policy’s definition of loss did not preclude coverage for statutory damages or damages representing the return of fees paid to the insured.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Liquidation, Debt collection, Statutory damages, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    SCOTUS lets stand security interest in proceeds of bankruptcy transfer of FCC license
    2013-06-05

    On May 13, 2013, the Supreme Court declined to review the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit1 that had held that a security interest may extend to the “proceeds” of the future transfer of a license holder’s interest in its Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) broadcast license and that, under applicable state law, the security interest attached upon execution of the security agreement, despite the fact that the parties did not contemplate a transfer of the license at that time.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, Debtor, Federal Communications Commission (USA), Title 11 of the US Code, Supreme Court of the United States, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Chérie R. Kiser , Joel H. Levitin , Richard A. Stieglitz Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 868
    • Page 869
    • Page 870
    • Page 871
    • Current page 872
    • Page 873
    • Page 874
    • Page 875
    • Page 876
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days