Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Receiverships: you don't know what you don't know
    2011-04-06

    Receiverships are on the rise in Ohio and across the Midwest. In most cases, the appointment of a receiver heralds the close of a business. Receiverships are also commonly part of a foreclosure proceeding. Calfee's Business Restructuring and Insolvency practice group lawyers have extensive experience with both state and federal court receiverships and we can assist you in determining the impact of a receivership on your business.

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Insolvency & Restructuring, Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Unsecured debt, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Common law
    Authors:
    Jean R. Robertson , James M. Lawniczak , Nathan A. Wheatley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
    Aircraft leasing update: second circuit gives liftoff to billions in unsecured tax indemnity claims
    2011-04-13

    When an airline goes bankrupt, do the owner participants in aircraft leverage-lease transactions have a right to recover on monetary claims (worth billions) based on tax indemnification agreements ("TIAs")? The answer lies in the meaning of the words "pay/paid/pays," which had been the subject of conflicting interpretations in the bankruptcy and district courts in the Northwest Airlines and Delta Air Lines bankruptcy cases.

    Filed under:
    USA, Aviation, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Interest, Debt, Tax deduction, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), Bankruptcy discharge, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Elizabeth H. Evans , Michelle F. Herman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Seventh Circuit denies fees to breaching DIP lender in re Arlington Hospitality, Inc.
    2011-04-13

    The Seventh Circuit affirmed a district court’s ruling that a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) lender had breached its financing agreement, barring its claim for commitment and funding fees from the DIP. Arlington LF, LLC v. Arlington Hospitality, Inc., No. 09-3560, 2011 WL 727981, *9 (7th Cir. March 3, 2011), aff’g No. 08 C 5098, 2011 WL 3055350 (N.D. Ill. Sept. 18, 2009). Although the DIP itself had also breached the agreement, that breach was not, in the court’s view, effective until after the lender had already “walked away.” Id. at *6.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Condition precedent, Debtor, Interim order, Breach of contract, Interest, Investment banking, Default (finance), Line of credit, Subsidiary, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Karen S. Park
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Court refuses to modify $45 billion sale of Lehman assets to Barclays
    2011-04-12

    On February 22, 2011, Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision declining to modify the September 20, 2008 Sale Order that approved the sale to Barclays PLC (“Barclays”) of assets collectively comprising the bulk of the North American investment banking and capital markets business of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”), Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”) and certain of their affiliates (together “Lehman”).

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chadbourne & Parke LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Investment banking, Misrepresentation, Fair market value, Barclays, Lehman Brothers, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Thomas J. Hall , Emily Abrahams
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Chadbourne & Parke LLP
    Labor and employment issues in special servicer and other third-party management agreements
    2011-04-11

    When a special servicer or third-party manager takes over a distressed asset or franchise, no one thinks about labor and employment issues until a problem surfaces. While a special servicer or third-party manager with its own employees in the area can usually expect a smooth transition, these arrangements often occur in places that are far-removed from the headquarters or home office. A special servicer may simply assume that it is taking over the former operator’s employees, and not think twice about other labor issues.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC, Breach of contract, Discrimination, Government agency, Solicitation, Anti-discrimination law, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (USA)
    Authors:
    Wesley C. Redmond
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
    When tribal gaming goes sour... rights & remedies in an unclear legal environment
    2011-04-11

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Option (finance), Debt, Credit risk, Foreclosure, Balance sheet, Default (finance), Casino, Leverage (finance), Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Weathering the storm: district court imposes additional duties on creditors seeking to reclaim goods sold to a debtor during the 45-day period preceding the bankruptcy case
    2011-04-11

    Vendors who sell goods to customers are probably familiar with the issues that arise when the customer later files bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Haynes and Boone LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    AbitibiBowater commences avoidance actions
    2011-04-10

    Earlier this month, Avidity Partners, LLC ("Avidity"), in its role as claims agent for the bankruptcy estates of AbitibiBowater, Inc, et al ("Debtors"), began filing avoidance actions against various defendants. As alleged in the complaints, on April 16, 2009, Debtors filed petitions for bankruptcy with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Limited liability company, Limited liability partnership, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Service issues letter ruling on application of Section 382(l)(5) for a consolidated group which filed for bankruptcy protection under Title 11
    2011-04-10

    In PLR 201051019 (12/23/2010), the Service ruled that in computing a consolidated group’s §382 limitation after filing for bankruptcy relief, all of its outstanding liabilities before the ownership change should be taken into account at the adjusted issue price, regardless of whether the obligations were subsequently discharged in whole or in part during the recognition period.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Taxable income, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Holding company, Subsidiary, Preferred stock, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jerald David August
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Enforcement of intercreditor agreements — when should their terms give way to the "bankruptcy imperative"?
    2011-04-07

    Recently, several courts have added to the growing body of decisions construing intercreditor agreements in bankruptcy cases.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Waiver, Interest, Debt, Mortgage loan, Federal Communications Commission (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mitchell A. Seider , Melinda C. Franek , Joseph S. Fabiani
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 702
    • Page 703
    • Page 704
    • Page 705
    • Current page 706
    • Page 707
    • Page 708
    • Page 709
    • Page 710
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days