Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    FERC v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC Saga Ends With Default Judgment Against Powhatan Energy Fund
    2023-03-30

    On March 22, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Court) granted the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (FERC) Motion for Default Judgment and entered a default judgment against Powhatan Energy Fund, LLC (Powhatan Energy Fund). The Court awarded FERC $3,465,108 in disgorgement and $16,800,000 in civil penalties.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sidley Austin LLP, FERC, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit, US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia
    Authors:
    Kenneth W. Irvin , Terence T. Healey , Christopher J. Polito , Casey Khan , Keturah A. Brown
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sidley Austin LLP
    Eleventh Circuit Establishes Bright-Line Rule on Additional Disclosure and Re-Solicitation of Votes for Modified Chapter 11 Plan
    2023-03-30

    A chapter 11 plan may be modified after votes have been solicited on the plan, but prior to confirmation, without providing creditors and interest holders with an amended disclosure statement and another opportunity to vote on the modified plan, provided, among other things, that the modifications do not adversely affect creditors or interest holders who previously voted to accept the plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Oliver S. Zeltner , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Second Circuit Weighs In on Bankruptcy Code v. Chapter 11 Plan Impairment and the Solvent-Debtor Exception
    2023-03-30

    A handful of recent high-profile court rulings have considered whether a chapter 11 debtor is obligated to pay postpetition, pre-effective date interest ("pendency interest") to unsecured creditors to render their claims "unimpaired" under a chapter 11 plan in accordance with the pre-Bankruptcy Code common law "solvent-debtor" exception requiring a solvent debtor to pay pendency interest to unsecured creditors. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit weighed in on this question in In re LATAM Airlines Grp. S.A., 55 F.4th 377 (2d Cir. 2022).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Dan B. Prieto , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Foreign Representative's Failure to Communicate with Bankruptcy Court Warrants Closure of Chapter 15 Case
    2023-03-30

    Like debtors, bankruptcy trustees, official committees, examiners, and estate-compensated professionals, foreign representatives in chapter 15 cases have statutory reporting obligations to the bankruptcy court and other stakeholders as required by the plain language of the Bankruptcy Code. Such duties include the obligation to keep the U.S. bankruptcy court promptly informed of changes in either the status of the debtor's foreign bankruptcy case or the status of the foreign representative's appointment in that case. Furthermore, chapter 15 provides a U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Insolvency, UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Corinne Ball , Dan T. Moss , Michael C. Schneidereit , Isel M. Perez , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Funds Insider | Issue 8
    2023-03-30

    As the economic headwinds indicate that borrowers will continue to face financial pressures in 2023 and beyond, lenders are seeking ways to exercise more leverage as “covenant-lite” facilities prevail. Material adverse change clauses in finance documents UK and US perspective By Olga Galazoula, Jacques McChesney and Charlotte Harvey 4 FUNDS INSIDER FUNDS INSIDER 5 The event relied upon by the lender to enforce this clause was the making of an arbitration award that could potentially result in significant damages being awarded against the borrower.

    Filed under:
    Luxembourg, United Kingdom, USA, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Corporate Finance/M&A, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Ashurst, Libor, Private equity, Climate change, Supply chain, Mediation, Due diligence, Carbon neutrality, Euribor, ESG, Anti-money laundering, COP26, COP27 , House of Lords, Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022 (UK)
    Location:
    Luxembourg, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Ashurst
    Bankruptcy 101: Bankruptcy Cases, Adversary Proceedings, and Contested Matters- Bankruptcy Basics for New and Non-Bankruptcy Attorneys
    2023-03-30

    This entry is part of Nelson Mullins’s ongoing “Bankruptcy Basics” blog series that is intended to address foundational aspects of bankruptcy for new and non-bankruptcy practitioners and professionals. This entry will discuss the general structure of bankruptcy cases and the differences between “adversary proceedings” and “contested matters.”

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    John T. Baxter
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court Bankruptcy Roundup
    2023-03-30

    Exception from Discharge of Debts for Fraud Committed by Business Partner

    On February 22, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down its ruling in Bartenwerfer v. Buckley, No. 21-908, 2023 WL 214441 (U.S. Feb. 22, 2023), where it resolved a circuit split in ruling that a debt based on fraud committed by, or a false representation made by, the debtor's partner or agent is nondischargeable in the debtor's bankruptcy case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Christopher Dipompeo , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Board Observers - spectators or participants - help or hindrance?
    2023-03-30

    With increased distress in the mid-market we may well see lenders using different tools to keep a closer eye on a company’s financial performance. One of those tools is to appoint a board observer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Corporate governance, Board of directors
    Authors:
    Stuart Brinkworth
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Chapter 15 Recognition Limited to Foreign Insolvency, Liquidation, or Restructuring Proceedings
    2023-03-30

    In In re Global Cord Blood Corp., 2022 WL 17478530 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2022), the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied without prejudice a petition filed by the joint provisional liquidators for recognition of a "winding-up" proceeding commenced under Cayman Islands law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Compliance Management, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Corporate governance, Mediation, Articles of association, Insolvency, UNCITRAL
    Authors:
    Corinne Ball , Dan T. Moss , Michael C. Schneidereit , Isel M. Perez , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    And Another Lender Blocking Provision Bites the Dust, Texas Bankruptcy Court Rules
    2023-03-30

    The Bottom Line

    One feature commonly seen in commercial lending transactions is a waiver of the borrower’s authority to file for bankruptcy without the consent of the lender. While such “blocking” provisions are generally upheld where the equity interest holders are the parties with such rights, they are generally unenforceable as a matter of public policy when such protection is given to a creditor with no meaningful ownership interest in the corporate debtor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Adam C. Rogoff , Ashland J. Bernard
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 63
    • Page 64
    • Page 65
    • Page 66
    • Current page 67
    • Page 68
    • Page 69
    • Page 70
    • Page 71
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days