In the case involving Precision Business Consulting LLC (Precision) and debtor-appellee Jill Suzann Medley, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit delivered a decisive opinion that sheds light on the treatment of factoring companies as lenders within the context of bankruptcy proceedings. This analysis emerges from Precision’s appeal against a civil contempt order for its willful violation of the automatic stay provision under 11 U.S.C. § 362, operational during Medley’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition.
In Breanne Martin v. Leslie Gladstone, the Second District Court of Appeal recently decided a case that could reverberate throughout the receivership and bankruptcy industries. This case comes at a propitious moment as bankruptcy proceedings and receiverships – particularly for distressed commercial real estate entities – trend upward in California. Receivers and bankruptcy trustees alike should consider this case before operating a commercial real estate distressed entity.
The Doughertys’ Bankruptcy Proceeding
Turmoil in the tech ecosystem and escalating sentiment that a recession in the U.S. might occur in the near-term, indicate that startups, their lenders, and investors may soon confront extreme financial challenges – and will force all stakeholders in a troubled venture to consider strategic options. Distressed startups raise a unique set of legal issues that should be considered and addressed by their stakeholders in connection with any strategic transaction. Here are a few:
The Small Business Administration ("SBA") has made an adjustment to its guidance to provide that entities which have concluded a bankruptcy proceeding are not, for purposes of PPP eligibility, considered in bankruptcy. Entities which are presently in bankruptcy are not eligible for a PPP loan.
The Sixth Circuit recently ruled that an agricultural "multi-service finance company" had no claim to the proceeds of produce held in trust pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act ("PACA")1 and could not circumvent the security interests of a senior lender. The unpublished decision,2 which relied upon established law in the Ninth, Second, and Third Circuits (among others), serves as a reminder to financers in the agribusiness space--and beyond--of the risks inherent in lending in an uncertain economic environment.
Background
In the recently-passed Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (the "Act"), Congress provided much-needed cover for landlords that enter into forbearance agreements with their tenants during the COVID-19 pandemic by protecting landlords from exposure to preference litigation arising out of the deferred rent payments if the tenant were to later file bankruptcy.
What is a preference?
A Marijuana Related Business (or MRB), whether a plant-touching operation or a provider of goods and services to a plant-touching operations cannot seek protection from the Bankruptcy Court as Bankruptcy Court is a Federal Court and Cannabis remains illegal at the Federal level. As such, an MRB does not have the benefit of an court approved restructuring as provided by Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code and does not receive the benefit of an orderly liquidation as provided by Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code.
Historical Considerations
It is no secret that business bankruptcies are surging in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
In a small victory for landlords of bankrupt tenants, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas has ruled that the Chuck E. Cheese parent company may not use its bankruptcy filing to avoid paying its rent.