Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New FTC rule bans debt relief providers from charging advance fees
    2010-07-29

    Today the Federal Trade Commission announced a new rule directed specifically at regulating the debt relief industry. Initially proposed eleven months ago, the new rule implements a vast set of requirements and prohibitions, including an absolute ban on charging any fees to consumers before settlements are reached with creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Loeb & Loeb LLP, Consumer protection, Fraud, Telemarketing, Debt, Debt relief, Consumer debt, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Northbrook Bank and Trust Company assumes all of the deposits of Ravenswood Bank
    2010-08-08

    On Friday, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking closed Ravenswood Bank, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, and appointed the FDIC as receiver for the bank.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Share (finance), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Authors:
    Colin Roberts
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Illinois appeal courts affirm mortgagee's right to appointment of a receiver
    2010-08-06

    Introduction
    108 N State
    Olde Prairie case
    Comment


    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Retail, Leasehold estate, Limited liability company, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Default (finance), Bank of America
    Authors:
    Kenneth M. Jacobson , Devan H. Popat
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Shandler v. DLJ Merchant Banking, Inc., C.A. No. 4797-VCS (Del. Ch. July 26, 2010) (Strine, V.C.)
    2010-08-05

    In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery considered a motion to dismiss claims brought on behalf of Insilco Technologies, Inc. (“Insilco”) by the plaintiff, a bankruptcy court appointed Creditor Trustee. Among other claims, plaintiff brought claims for breach of fiduciary duty against Insilco’s controlling stockholder, a group of affiliated funds (the “DLJ Funds”) allegedly dominated and controlled by DLJ, Inc. and DLJ Merchant Banking, Inc. (“DLJMB”) (collectively, “DLJ”), and a group of DLJ-affiliated directors who comprised a majority of Insilco’s board.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Investment banking, Memorandum opinion, Court of Chancery, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
    Pro-rata calculation of pre-petition portion of tax refund was reasonable
    2010-08-11

    IN RE: MEYERS (August 2, 2010)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Legal burden of proof, Prima facie, Pro rata, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    New U.S. Supreme Court rulings
    2010-08-11

    When a bankruptcy court calculates the "projected disposable income" in a repayment plan proposed by an above-median-income chapter 13 debtor, the court may "account for changes in the debtor's income or expenses that are known or virtually certain at the time of confirmation," the U.S. Supreme Court held in Hamilton v. Lanning on June 7. Writing for the 8-1 majority, Justice Samuel A.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Tax exemption, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Personal property, Dissenting opinion, Majority opinion, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Insider’s compensation claim capped at zero under section 502(b)(4)
    2010-08-11

    The Bankruptcy Code treats insiders with increased scrutiny, from longer preference periods to rigorous equitable subordination principles, denial of chapter 7 trustee voting rights, disqualification in some cases of votes on a cram-down chapter 11 plan, and restrictions on postpetition key-employee compensation packages. The treatment of claims by insiders for prebankruptcy services is no exception to this general policy: section 502(b)(4) disallows insider claims for services to the extent the claim exceeds the "reasonable value" of such services.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Legal burden of proof, Good faith, Subsidiary, Chief financial officer, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David G. Marks
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Bankruptcy studies to be conducted under new financial reform law
    2010-08-11

    President Barack Obama gave his imprimatur to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 on July 21. Relatively few of the provisions in the new law implicate the Bankruptcy Code. However, among other things, the law does call on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, in consultation with the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (the "Administrative Office"), to conduct two bankruptcy-related studies.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Consumer protection, US Senate, Federal Reserve (USA), US House of Representatives, US House Committee on Financial Services, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Deposit Insurance Act 1950 (USA)
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The end of Frenville: relief or more confusion?
    2010-08-10

    As part of the overhaul of bankruptcy laws in 1978, Congress for the first time included the definition of "claim" as part of the Bankruptcy Code. A few years later, in Avellino & Bienes v. M. Frenville Co. (In re M. Frenville Co.), the Third Circuit became the first court of appeals to examine the scope of this new definition in the context of the automatic stay.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Retail, Debtor, Injunction, Liquidation, Bankruptcy discharge, US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Paul M. Green
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    No safe harbor in a bankruptcy storm: mutuality “baked into the very definition of setoff”
    2010-08-10

    "Safe harbors" in the Bankruptcy Code designed to insulate nondebtor parties to financial contracts from the consequences that normally ensue when a counterparty files for bankruptcy have been the focus of a considerable amount of scrutiny as part of evolving developments in the Great Recession. One of the most recent developments concerning this issue in the courts was the subject of a ruling handed down by the New York bankruptcy court presiding over the Lehman Brothers chapter 11 cases. In In re Lehman Bros. Holdings, Inc., Judge James M.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Conflict of laws, Debtor, Security (finance), Fraud, Division of property, Swap (finance), Commodity, Debt, Concession (contract), Liquidation, Debtor in possession, US Congress, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 645
    • Page 646
    • Page 647
    • Page 648
    • Current page 649
    • Page 650
    • Page 651
    • Page 652
    • Page 653
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days