Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    “Texas Two Step”: More Than A Legal Expletive? (Esserman v. Bestwall)
    2024-07-05

    The phrase “Texas Two-Step,” as used in bankruptcy, is a legal expletive. Regardless of what the details of a Texas Two-Step might be, the phrase has become synonymous with:

    • abusive behavior;
    • bad faith conduct;
    • a means for swindling creditors;
    • the antithesis of “doing what’s right”;
    • a tool for avoiding liability;
    • etc., etc.

    Describing a legal tactic as a “Texas Two-Step” is like calling that tactic a “#$&*#%R&” or “#*$&.” It’s a legal expletive that means “really, really bad.”

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 6—Subchapter V Trustee As Mediator?
    2024-06-06

    On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report.

    This article is the sixth in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is:

    • whether a Subchapter V trustee should act as a mediator.[Fn. 1]

    Recommendation

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    SDNY Adopts Guidelines for Combined Hearing on Disclosure Statement Approval and Chapter 11 Plan Confirmation
    2024-06-06

    On May 31, 2024, the chief judge of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) entered General Order M-634, adopting guidelines for combining the processes for Chapter 11 plan confirmation under Section 1129 of the Bankruptcy Code and disclosure statement approval under Section 1125 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
    Authors:
    Robert D. Drain, , Moshe S. Jacob
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
    Supreme Court Supports Standing for Insurers in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Cases
    2024-06-06

    This morning, the Supreme Court decided Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., which clarifies that any party with a "direct financial stake in the outcome" of a reorganization has standing as a "party in interest" to object to a Chapter 11 plan. 11 U.S.C. 1109(b). Writing for a unanimous Court, Justice Sotomayor held that the debtor's insurer has standing to object even if the plan purports to preserve the insurer's legal rights and thus is said to be "insurance neutral."

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Zack Tripp , Joshua Wesneski , Shai Berman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court: Debtors’ Insurance Company Has Standing to Be Heard in Chapter 11 Proceeding
    2024-06-12

    The U.S. Supreme Court held last week in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. that an insurance company with financial responsibility for bankruptcy claims is a “party in interest” with the right to object to a Chapter 11 reorganization plan.

    Section 1109(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark A. Platt , J. Kendrick Wells, IV
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Beyond Traditional Financing: Exploring Equity-Linked DIP Strategies in WeWork and Enviva
    2024-06-11

    Building on emerging trends, 2024 has seen a continued rise in the use of equity-linked debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing in Chapter 11 cases.

    Recent examples from WeWork and Enviva illustrate how stakeholders are leveraging this innovative tool to drive broader reorganization strategies and outcomes rather than as a mechanism solely providing interim financing to fund a debtor’s operations during the pendency of its bankruptcy case.

    WeWork

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Moshe S. Jacob , Shana A. Elberg , Bram A. Strochlic
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
    Supreme Court Confirms Insurers’ Right to Participate in Bankruptcy Proceedings
    2024-06-11

    On June 6, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its much-anticipated decision in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser GypsumCo., Inc., et al. No. 22-1079. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Sotomayor,1 the Court vacated a Fourth Circuit decision and ruled in favor of Truck Insurance Exchange, confirming that an insurer with financial responsibility for a bankruptcy claim is a "party in interest" and therefore has standing to object to a Chapter 11 plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Christopher J. St. Jeanos , Joseph G. Davis , Jennifer Hardy , Charles Dean Cording , Patricia O. Haynes
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP
    Shifting Gears on Insurer Participation in Chapter 11 Proceedings: U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Longstanding “Insurance Neutrality” Doctrine
    2024-06-12

    On June 6, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., No. 22-1079, conferring broad standing to debtors’ pre-bankruptcy liability insurers to appear and be heard in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. The ruling eliminates the “insurance neutrality” doctrine that previously constrained the participation of insurers in Chapter 11, greatly expanding insurers’ capacity to influence the reorganization process.

    Background: Insurer Standing in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, McGuireWoods LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Joshua Q. Jamieson , Lindsay Brandt Jakubowitz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McGuireWoods LLP
    Sub V Task Force Report In A Nutshell: Part 7—$7,500,000 Debt Cap
    2024-06-13

    On April 23, 2024, the American Bankruptcy Institute’s Subchapter V Task Force issued its Final Report.

    This article is the seventh in a series summarizing and condensing the Task Force’s Final Report into “a nutshell.” The subject of this article is:

    • whether the $7,500,000 debt cap for Subchapter V eligibility should remain or revert to an interest-adjusted $3,024,725.

    Recommendation

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, American Bankruptcy Institute
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Client Alert: Critical Vendor in Texas: It’s a Rodeo
    2024-06-13

    In Chapter 11 cases, one of a vendor’s best shots at getting paid its pre-petition debt is being designated as a “critical vendor”.

    In connection with the Zachry Holdings Chapter 11 case filed in the Southern District of Texas on May 21, 2024, the Bankruptcy Court made disturbing comments regarding treatment of critical vendors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shumaker Loop & Kendrick, Bankruptcy, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Chapter 11, US Bankruptcy Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David H. Conaway
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Shumaker Loop & Kendrick

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • Current page 38
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Page 41
    • Page 42
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days