Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    U.S. Supreme Court Rejects Purdue Pharma Opioid Settlement, Resolving Circuit Split and Ending the Use of Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans
    2024-06-28

    The U.S. Supreme Court reversed confirmation of Purdue Pharma’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan of reorganization on the basis that its non-consensual third-party releases were not permissible. It held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize the inclusion of a release in a plan that effectively seeks to discharge claims against a non-debtor without the consent of affected claimants. The decision prohibits an approach to global resolution of mass tort litigations that has been utilized in numerous cases over the last 40 years.

    Takeaways

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, A&O Shearman, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Chris Newcomb , Daniel Guyder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    A&O Shearman
    Supreme Court’s Purdue Decision Requires Nationwide Adoption of 5th Circuit Bankruptcy Practice on Third-Party Releases
    2024-06-28

    On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., 603 U.S. ____ (2024) holding that the Bankruptcy Code does not allow for the inclusion of non-consensual third-party releases in chapter 11 plans. This decision settles a long-standing circuit split on the propriety of such releases and clarifies that a plan may not provide for the release of claims against non-debtors without the consent of the claimants.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP, Bankruptcy, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Tyler P. Brown , Brian M. Clarke , Timothy A. Davidson II , Phillip J. Eskenazi , Philip M. Guffy , Jason W. Harbour , Gregory G. Hesse , Robert A. Rich
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
    In Purdue Pharma, the Supreme Court Fires a Canon of Construction Through Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases (US)
    2024-06-28

    On June 27, 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that a bankruptcy court does not have the statutory authority to discharge creditors’ claims against a non-debtor without the creditors’ consent (except in asbestos cases). The decision in Harrington v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs
    Authors:
    Justin Cloyd
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    U.S. Supreme Court Removes Nonconsensual Releases From The Bankruptcy Plan Quiver
    2024-06-28

    On June 27, the U.S. Supreme Court announced a 5-4 decision rejecting the nonconsensual releases of the Sackler family in the Purdue Pharma bankruptcy case. The split is an interesting alignment of Justices: Gorsuch writing the majority opinion, joined by Thomas, Alito, Barrett and Jackson; Kavanaugh for the dissent, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor and Kagan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Julia Winters
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Potential Impact of UCC Article 12 on Fund Finance Transactions
    2024-06-28

    At the bottom of the stack in investment fund structures, there are generally “real” assets—things like equity interests in portfolio companies, mortgage loans, commercial receivables, maybe even bricks and mortar. Fund finance transactions, though, are by design crafted to be at several levels removed from such underlying assets. With such ultimate assets remote from the transaction, it may seem to fund finance practitioners that concerns about changes in the Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) relating to the nature of collateral assets are just as remote.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Chris McDermott , Trent E. Lindsay , Eric Starr
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    US Supreme Court: Nonconsensual Third-Party Releases Impermissible Under Bankruptcy Code
    2024-06-28

    The US Supreme Court ruled in a landmark 5-4 decision on June 27, 2024 that nonconsensual third-party releases, as proposed in Purdue Pharma’s bankruptcy plan, were not permissible under the Bankruptcy Code. A nonconsensual third-party release serves to eliminate the direct claims of third parties against nondebtor parties without soliciting the consent of such affected claimants. This contrasts with consensual releases and opt-in or opt-out mechanisms permitted by courts.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Jennifer Feldsher , David K. Shim
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
    Supreme Court Rejects Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases in Chapter 11 Plans
    2024-06-28

    In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma LP, in a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court held that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize bankruptcy courts to confirm a Chapter 11 bankruptcy plan that discharges creditors’ claims against third parties without the consent of the affected claimants. The decision rejects the bankruptcy plan of Purdue Pharma, which had released members of the Sackler family from liability for their role in the opioid crisis. Justice Gorsuch wrote the majority decision. Justice Kavanaugh dissented, joined by Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kagan and Sotomayor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Chapter 11, US Bankruptcy Code, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Zack Tripp , Ronit J. Berkovich , Joshua Wesneski , Luke Sullivan , Sebastian Laguna
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Supreme Court Overturns Purdue Bankruptcy Plan
    2024-06-30

    Releases of Sackler Family Too Broad and Not Authorized by the Bankruptcy Code

    SUMMARY

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, Supreme Court of the United States
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Sullivan & Cromwell LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Allows Secured Creditor to Be Paid from $5 Million Bond and Enforces Default Tate Interest Agreement and Intercreditor Agreement
    2024-07-01

    In In re Flatbush Rho Mezz LLC, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York allowed a secured creditor to be paid the entirety of a $5 million bond based on a loan with 24% default rate interest that continued to accrue interest during the pendency of an appeal.

    Background of the Dispute

    One of the three debtors, 85 Flatbush RHO Mezz LLC ("Mezz"), acquired a mixed-use property “with a hotel component” in Brooklyn, New York.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Authors:
    Noah Weingarten , Bethany D. Simmons
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Loeb & Loeb LLP
    Corporate Insights: Ten Reasons to Expect an Increase in Financial Restructurings in 2025
    2024-07-01

    1. Commercial Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filings Have Increased Significantly Year-Over-Year: There has been a significant increase in the number of commercial Chapter 11 cases (larger company filings) in 2024. By way of example, there were 1,894 commercial Chapter 11 filings (including subchapter V filings) during the first quarter of 2024, up 43% from the 1,325 total commercial chapter 11 filings during the first calendar quarter of 2023 according to data provided by Epiq Bankruptcy, the leading provider of U.S. bankruptcy filing data.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bowditch & Dewey LLP, Financial services banks
    Authors:
    Mark W. Powers , Aastha Sharma
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bowditch & Dewey LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Current page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • Page 38
    • Page 39
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days