Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    In Brief: "Failing" Delaware Corporation Can Transfer Assets to Creditors in Lieu of Foreclosure Without Shareholder Consent
    2021-05-21

    In Stream TV Networks, Inc. v. SeeCubic, Inc., 2020 WL 7230419 (Del. Ch. Dec. 8, 2020), the Delaware Court of Chancery held that the assets of Stream TV Networks, Inc. ("Stream"), an insolvent Delaware-incorporated 3-D television technology company, could be transferred to an affiliate of two of Stream's secured creditors in lieu of foreclosure without seeking the approval of Stream's shareholders under section 271 of the General Corporation Law of Delaware ("DGCL") or Stream's certificate of incorporation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    First Impressions: Tenth Circuit BAP Rules that Section 364 of the Bankruptcy Code Does Not Apply to Chapter 11 Exit Financing
    2020-12-11

    The ability of a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") to obtain credit or financing during the course of a bankruptcy case is often crucial to the debtor's prospects for either maintaining operations pending the development of a confirmable plan of reorganization or facilitating an orderly liquidation designed to maximize asset values for the benefit of all stakeholders. In a chapter 11 case, financing (and/or cash infusions through recapitalization) also is often a key component of the reorganized debtor's ability to operate post-bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Daniel J. Merrett (Dan) , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    From the Top in Brief: U.S. Supreme Court Bankruptcy Roundup
    2020-08-13

    Appointment of PROMESA Financial Oversight Board Was Constitutional

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, SCOTUS
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Claims to Dividends Originating From Stock Trust Subordinated Under Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code
    2019-12-13

    Section 510(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides a mechanism designed to preserve the creditor/shareholder risk allocation paradigm by categorically subordinating most types of claims asserted against a debtor by equity holders. However, courts do not always agree on the scope of the provision in attempting to implement its underlying policy objectives. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently examined the broad reach of section 510(b) in In re Linn Energy, 936 F.3d 334 (5th Cir. 2019).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Second Circuit Rules that Bankruptcy Code’s Fraudulent Transfer Recovery Provisions Can Reach Foreign Transferees
    2019-06-18

    The ability of a bankruptcy trustee to avoid fraudulent or preferential transfers is a fundamental part of U.S. bankruptcy law. However, when an otherwise avoidable transfer by a U.S. entity takes place outside the U.S. to a non-U.S. transferee—as is increasingly common in the global economy—courts disagree as to whether the Bankruptcy Code’s avoidance provisions apply extraterritorially to avoid the transfer and recover the transferred assets. Several bankruptcy and appellate courts have addressed this issue in recent years, with inconsistent results.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Charles M. Oellermann , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Caveat Emptor—Anti-Assignment Clause Renders Transferred Claim Unenforceable
    2018-10-10

    Amid the explosion of trading in claims against distressed and bankrupt entities, courts in recent years have issued numerous rulings of interest to both buyers and sellers.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Due diligence
    Authors:
    Brad B. Erens , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Lease Profit-Sharing Provision Unenforceable Condition to Assignment in Bankruptcy
    2018-02-02

    In Antone Corp. v. Haggen Holdings, LLC (In re Haggen Holdings, LLC), 2017 WL 3730527 (D. Del. Aug. 30, 2017), the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware considered whether, as part of a bankruptcy asset sale, a chapter 11 debtor could assume and assign a nonresidential real property lease without giving effect to a clause in the lease requiring the debtor to share 50 percent of any net profits realized upon assignment.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Isel M. Perez
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Courts, Cooperation, and More: Incorporating Case-Specific Provisions in Insolvency Protocols
    2017-09-05

    In Short

    The Situation: In cross-border restructuring cases, court-approved insolvency protocols are applied to facilitate communication between U.S. and foreign courts and standardize certain common procedures. The protocols are sometimes adapted to address case-specific issues.

    The Result: Case-specific provisions tend to address information-sharing guidelines, claims reconciliation, the management of assets, and dispute resolution.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    Kevyn D. Orr , Dan T. Moss , Anna M. Wetzel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Singapore, U.K., Delaware, and New York Courts Adopt Guidelines for Communication and Cooperation Between Courts in Cross-Border Insolvency Matters
    2017-05-31

    On February 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Singapore and the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware announced that they had formally implemented Guidelines for Communication and Cooperation between Courts in Cross-Border Insolvency Matters (the "Guidelines"). The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York adopted the Guidelines on February 17, 2017.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, United Kingdom, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Stakeholder (corporate), Liquidator (law), United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Corinne Ball , Sushma Jobanputra , Ben Larkin
    Location:
    Singapore, United Kingdom, USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Administrative Claim May Be Set Off Against Preference Liability
    2017-01-27

    In Official Comm. of Unsecured Creditors of Quantum Foods, LLC v. Tyson Foods, Inc. (In re Quantum Foods, LLC), 554 B.R. 729 (Bankr. D. Del. 2016), a Delaware bankruptcy court held in a matter of apparent first impression that a creditor’s allowed administrative expense claim may be set off against the creditor’s potential liability for a preferential transfer. The ruling is an important development for prepetition vendors that continue to provide goods or services to a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor-in-possession.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, United States bankruptcy court, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1962
    • Page 1963
    • Page 1964
    • Page 1965
    • Current page 1966
    • Page 1967
    • Page 1968
    • Page 1969
    • Page 1970
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days