Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Reclamation claims and lien priority
    2016-08-26

    On August 24, 2016, Judge Mary F. Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court overruling an objection to claim for reclamation. The decision was issued in the Reichold Holdings US, Inc. Bankruptcy (Case No. 14-12237) in the Delaware Bankruptcy Court. A copy of the Opinion is available here.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Limited liability company
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Swift - Motion for stay pending appeal denied
    2016-07-05

    On June 29, 2016, Judge Sleet of the Delaware District Court entered an order denying a motion for stay of the Debtors’ plan confirmation pending appeal. A copy of the related Opinion is attached here.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Iron Bridge Tools has a new tool in its belt - Chapter 11 bankruptcy
    2016-05-26

    Yesterday, Iron Bridge Tools, Inc., a full-service design, development, and distribution company serving the consumer and professional hand-tool market, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in Fort Lauderdale (Case No. 16-17505-RBR).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP
    Authors:
    Heather L. Ries
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    The intersection between criminal law and bankruptcy law: can filing for bankruptcy affect a criminal defendant's sentence?
    2013-02-05

    Criminal defendants facing onerous restitution obligations as part of their sentence might contemplate a bankruptcy filing, in the hope of staving off the restitution obligation. In a case of first impression, the Second Circuit recently considered whether the Bankruptcy Code’s automatic stay provision halts a defendant’s obligation to pay restitution and firmly closed the door on that potential gambit.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Second Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Back Yard Burgers files for bankruptcy in Delaware
    2012-10-23

    On October 17, 2012, Back Yard Burgers, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    What are the scope and limitations of a rule 2004 examination?
    2012-07-23

    Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004(a) states that "[o]n motion of any party in interest, the court may order the examination of any entity."  Courts construing Rule 2004(a) have found its scope "unfettered and broad."  In re Washington Mutual, Inc., 408 B.R. 45, 49 (Bankr. D. Del. 2009), citing In re Bennett Funding Group, Inc., 203 B.R. 24, 28 (Bankr. N. D. N.Y. 1996).  Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004(b) establishes some of the parameters of what is commonly referred to as a "Rule 2004 Examination":

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Enron
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    The ins and outs of surety bonds: the insolvent surety
    2012-04-05

    Commercial, and sometimes residential, construction requires a contractor to obtain a surety bond to guarantee performance leading to the successful conclusion of a project. Upon that occasion, a general contractor will obtain a surety bond from an authorized underwriter.

    Filed under:
    USA, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Surety, General contractor, Underwriting
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Chapter 7 trustee in ManagedStorage (aka Incentrix Solutions) files preference actions
    2012-02-05

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Preference complaints filed in the Velocity Express bankruptcy
    2011-09-24

    Earlier this month, James Carroll in his capacity as the "Wind Down Professional" for the Velocity Express bankruptcy, began filing preference actions against various defendants.  As alleged in the preference complaints, Carroll was appointed as Velocity's Wind Down Professional under a "Wind Down Order" entered by the Delaware Bankruptcy Court in July of last year.  At the time it filed for bankruptcy, Velocity was a package delivery (aka "logistics") provider whose services included customer bulk shipments, pick-up and delivery services as well as "expedited point to point servi

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Limited liability company, Limited partnership, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Decision in crucible materials requires preference claims to contain more than just recitations of the code
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    In a 12 page decision signed July 6, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that a complaint that sets forth only conclusory allegations parroting the statutory language of the Bankruptcy Code is insufficient. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Debtor, Debt, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1803
    • Page 1804
    • Page 1805
    • Page 1806
    • Current page 1807
    • Page 1808
    • Page 1809
    • Page 1810
    • Page 1811
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days