Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Ninth Circuit insulates corporate insider from preference liability
    2015-05-13

    “A corporate insider who personally guaranteed” the debtor’s loan was not liable on a bankruptcy trustee’s preference claim when the corporate debtor repaid its lender, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on May 6, 2015. In re Adamson Apparel, Inc., 2015 WL 2081575 (9th Cir. May 6, 2015) (2-1).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Supreme Court to review another decision limiting bankruptcy court’s power
    2014-07-08

    The United States Supreme Court, on July 1, 2014, granted a petition for certiorari in an important Seventh Circuit case limiting the power of bankruptcy courts to decide property disputes. Wellness International Network, Ltd. et al. v. Sharif, 727 F.3d 751 (7th Cir. 2013). The Seventh Circuit had held last year that the bankruptcy court lacked the constitutional authority to determine whether purported trust assets were property of the debtor’s estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Third Circuit permits reopening of reorganization case to enforce debtor’s purchase option in real estate lease
    2013-08-19

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held on July 30, 2013, that a reorganized Chapter 11 debtor could reopen its closed case, enabling the debtor assignee to enforce a purchase option in a real property lease despite the lease’s “anti-assignment provisions.” In re Lazy Days’ RV Center Inc., 2013 WL 3886735, *5 (3d Cir. July 30, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Fifth Amendment, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit decision reassures bankruptcy claim purchasers on enforceability of recourse against sellers
    2012-09-24

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit recently vacated a decision by the District Court for the Southern District of New York, which had declined to enforce the contractual allocation of claim impairment risk between a bankruptcy claim buyer and its seller.[1] Relying on the plain language of the documents, the Second Circuit held in Longacre Master Fund, Ltd. v. ATS Automation Tooling Systems Inc. (Longacre)that the debtors’ objection to the claims had triggered the seller’s repurchase obligation.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Warranty, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    David J. Karp
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Lehman Brothers disclosure statement approved
    2011-08-31

    On Aug. 30, 2011, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York approved the disclosure statement with respect to the revised second amended joint Chapter 11 plan of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors (the “Debtors”). The order approving the Debtors’ disclosure statement and establishing certain procedures related to the hearing to consider confirmation of the plan (the “order”) can be accessed here.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Discovery, Voting, Solicitation, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Contested plan valuation dispute: Chemtura decision highlights valuation issues
    2010-11-16

    The current cycle of Chapter 11 corporate bankruptcies involves many cases where the debtor seeks to achieve a balance-sheet restructuring by converting debt into equity. When consensus cannot be achieved, junior stakeholders (i.e., second lien creditors, unsecured creditors and/or equity) will often contest plan confirmation on the grounds that the proposed plan provides more than 100% recovery to the senior creditors. Valuation plays the central role in these cases.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Balance sheet, EBITDA, Valuation (finance), Discounted cash flow, US District Court for SDNY
    Authors:
    David M. Hillman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Bankruptcy court orders swap counterparty to pay Lehman Brothers despite event of default
    2009-09-25

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order on Sept. 17, 2009, granting a motion filed by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”) to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to continue to make payments to LBSF under an ISDA Master Agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Motion to compel, Liquidation, Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, US Congress, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Kristin Boggiano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    District court affirms decision to deny Cayman Islands hedge funds access to U.S. bankruptcy court under Chapter 15
    2008-06-05

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently affirmed a bankruptcy court’s denial of Chapter 15 protection for the U.S. assets of two Cayman Islands hedge funds (the “Funds”) (previously reported in SRZ’s Sept. 19, 2007, Alert, “Cayman Hedge Funds Liquidators’ Request for Chapter 15 Protection Denied by Bankruptcy Court”). See Civ. Case No. 07-8730 (S.D.N.Y. May 27, 2008) (the “Decision”).

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Injunction, Asset management, Hedge funds, Foreclosure, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for SDNY
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Court denies hedge funds' motion to seal confidential trading information
    2007-03-12

    Members of the ad hoc shareholders’ committee in the Northwest Airlines reorganization case lost their attempt on March 9 to seal “the amounts of claims or interest [they] owned …, the times when acquired, the amounts paid therefor, and any sales or other disposition thereof.” So held Judge Allan L. Gropper of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in In re Northwest Airlines Corp., following his earlier ordering of the disclosure of trading details.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Confidentiality, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Interest, Discovery, Hedge funds, Motion to compel, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    If a committee steps into the debtor’s shoes - Just how good is the fit?
    2017-05-10

    On May 8, 2017, Judge Gross ruled on a Motion to Compel Production of Documents in the Haggen bankruptcy. Judge Gross’ opinion (the “Opinion”) addresses the conflict when a party is acting on another’s behalf and that entity claims “the oldest of the common law privileges”. Opinion at *5. A copy of the Opinion is available here.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Attorney-client privilege
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1800
    • Page 1801
    • Page 1802
    • Page 1803
    • Current page 1804
    • Page 1805
    • Page 1806
    • Page 1807
    • Page 1808
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days