Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Liquidation of troubled businesses
    2009-03-06

    Liquidations of struggling enterprises can take several forms. While many people are familiar with the concept of a "bankruptcy liquidation," the structure of a liquidation in bankruptcy may vary depending upon the specific type of case. Additionally, bankruptcy is not the only forum for liquidation of distressed companies, only the most common. This article provides a synopsis of some of the various types of liquidations.

    Chapter 11 Liquidations

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Retail, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Liquidation, Balance sheet, Liquidator (law), Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Fourth Circuit reverses and remands Bankruptcy Court’s narrow definition of “swap agreements”
    2009-03-19

    On February 11, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, addressing an apparent issue of first impression, ruled that a series of gas supply contracts might constitute “commodity forward agreements” and, in turn, “swap agreements,” exempt from the court-appointed trustee’s avoidance actions.1 The Court reversed and remanded the decision from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, which had held that the commodity supply contracts at issue were insufficiently tied to financial markets to be considered protected “commodity forwar

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Bankruptcy, Fraud, Natural gas, Swap (finance), Commodity, Remand (court procedure), Conveyancing, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Since Chapter 11 is a likely doomsday scenario, let’s create Chapter 10
    2009-03-26

    Much is being written about the significant losses suffered by automobile suppliers to both the domestic and transplant automobile manufacturers. These losses are creating alarm among many others, including the OEMs themselves, according to Dave Hannon at Purchasing Magazine.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Accounts receivable, Supply chain, US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Ronald L. Rose
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    Recent significant commercial bankruptcy filings
    2009-03-23

    The following is a list of some recent larger U.S. bankruptcy filings in various industries. To the extent you are a creditor to any of these debtors, or other entities which may have filed for bankruptcy protection, you as a creditor are entitled to certain protections under the Bankruptcy Code.  

    BANKRUPTCY REFORM

    House panel holds hearing on Circuit City liquidation; questions if BAPCPA to blame.  

    AUTOMOTIVE  

    Monaco Coach Corp. files Chapter 11 in Delaware.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Liquidation, Subsidiary, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Reinhold F. Krammer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
    Cross-border distressed M&A: S. 363 sales in Chapter 15 cases
    2009-04-09

    During the present downturn in the U.S. economy, opportunities exist for investors in global distressed asset markets. Purchasers and sellers involved in these markets should be aware of the various mechanisms that are available to transfer assets of distressed companies. Historically, asset sales under s. 363 of the Bankruptcy Code1 have proven to be cheaper and faster than purchasing distressed assets through a Chapter 11 reorganization. Recent cases have shown that s.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Torys LLP, Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Debtor, Consumer protection, Distressed securities, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alison D. Bauer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Torys LLP
    Bankruptcy in the auto industry: tips to protect your company
    2009-04-07

    While uncertainties loom around the auto industry, suppliers and OEMs can try to prepare for the road the lies ahead.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Bricker & Eckler LLP, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Credit (finance), Dividends, Accounts receivable, Supply chain, Bailout, Troubled Asset Relief Program, US Federal Government, General Motors, Chrysler, Title 11 of the US Code, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    Andria M. Beckham
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bricker & Eckler LLP
    Recent significant commercial bankruptcy filings
    2009-04-06

    The following is a list of some recent larger U.S. bankruptcy filings in various industries. To the extent you are a creditor to any of these debtors, or other entities which may have filed for bankruptcy protection, you as a creditor are entitled to certain protections under the Bankruptcy Code.  

    AEROSPACE  

    Fairchild Corp., 60 affiliates, file Chapter 11 petition; Phoenix Group is stalking horse.  

    CHEMICALS

    Chemtura Corp., 26 affiliates, file Chapter 11 petition.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Subsidiary, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Reinhold F. Krammer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
    Chapter 15 in practice: bankruptcy court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate avoidance actions in chapter 15 under U.S. or foreign law
    2009-04-02

    April 17, 2009, will mark the three-and-one-half-year anniversary of the effective date of chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, which was enacted as part of the comprehensive bankruptcy reforms implemented under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005.

    Filed under:
    USA, Mississippi, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consumer protection, Injunction, Interest, Liquidation, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas , Pedro A. Jimenez
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Bankruptcy court modifies success fee payable to debtor’s financial advisor in pre-packaged bankruptcy
    2009-03-31

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Contingent fee, Debtor in possession, Capital punishment, Leverage (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court decision in SemCrude prohibits triangular setoff in absence of safe harbor
    2009-03-31

    Earlier this year, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware ruled that a nondebtor cannot effect a “triangular” setoff of the amounts owed between it and three affiliated debtors, even if the parties had entered into pre-petition contracts that expressly contemplated multiparty setoff.1 In reaching its decision, the Court relied principally on the plain language of section 553(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which limits setoff to “mutual” obligations — i.e., direct obligations between a single obligor and obligee.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Debt, Limited partnership, Precondition, Subsidiary, Chevron Corporation, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    Mark C. Ellenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 121
    • Page 122
    • Page 123
    • Page 124
    • Current page 125
    • Page 126
    • Page 127
    • Page 128
    • Page 129
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days