Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    “Ticking TRUPS” threaten bank holding companies
    2014-11-19

    Trust preferred securities (TRUPs), the highbred security that counted as Tier 1 regulatory capital but generated tax deductible interest payments, were a favored source of capital for community banks. When the financial crisis hit, many bank holding companies (BHCs) with troubled bank subsidiaries exercised the right to defer interest payments on their outstanding TRUPs for up to five years. Interest continued to accrue during the deferral period, but the deferral was not a default and there was nothing that the TRUPs holder could do but wait.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Stinson LLP, Shareholder, Interest, Tax deduction, Bank holding company, Capital requirement, Preferred stock, Accrued interest
    Authors:
    Mike W. Lochmann
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stinson LLP
    TRuPS and involuntary bankruptcy
    2014-07-08

    One of the most dramatic tools a lender can use in the collection of a loan is the involuntary bankruptcy case.  It is dramatic because of the implications for both the debtor and the lender who files the case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bankruptcy, Debtor, Tax deduction, Bank holding company, Tier 1 capital, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jerry Blanchard
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Insolvent foreign subsidiaries
    2011-12-29

    Generic Legal Advice Memorandum AM 2011-003 (August 18, 2011)

    Overview

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Alston & Bird LLP, Shareholder, Liability (financial accounting), Tax deduction
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Partnership bankruptcy tax issues
    2008-06-07

    I. INTRODUCTION

    Bankruptcies and restructurings involving partners and partnerships1 raise a number of unique tax issues. While the IRS has provided guidance with respect to a number of these issues, a surprising number of unresolved issues remain. The first part of this outline summarizes the state of the law with respect to general tax issues that typically arise in connection with partner and partnership bankruptcies and restructurings. The balance of the outline discusses tax issues that arise under Subchapter K when troubled partnerships are reorganized.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Income tax, Tax deduction, Tax return (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Tax planning in a foreclosure
    2009-01-27

    With the country officially in a recession and the lack of available refinancing options continuing, more and more businesses are faced with the realities of foreclosure. While foreclosure often allows a business to wipe the debt slate clean with respect to the foreclosed property, it can also create unintended tax consequences as well as tax planning opportunities.  

    Recourse v. Non-Recourse Debt  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Debtor, Interest, Limited liability company, Debt, Foreclosure, Deed, Limited partnership, Tax deduction, Fair market value, Refinancing, Conveyancing, Accrued interest, Bankruptcy discharge
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC
    Potential ramifications of the Madoff investment crisis
    2009-01-26

    Investors victimized by the fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff and his company, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC (collectively Madoff), should be aware of their legal options and risks. Some of these options have very short deadlines. Likewise, investors who successfully withdrew their investments before Madoff`s fraud came to light could face potential claims. In either circumstance, the prospects of litigation are high.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, White Collar Crime, Foley & Lardner LLP, Bankruptcy, Security (finance), Fraud, Class action, Statute of limitations, Taxable income, Option (finance), Liquidation, Tax deduction, Tax return (USA), Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Constitutional amendment, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act encourages debt repurchases and restructurings
    2009-02-20

    Recent declines in the trading prices of many companies' debt securities has created opportunities for those companies to reacquire a portion or all of that debt at substantial discounts through open market repurchases, privately negotiated transactions and tender offers. In some cases, the opportunities for discounted repurchases come to companies directly from investors seeking to sell the debt back in order to meet their own cash needs or otherwise obtain liquidity for thinly-traded securities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dentons, Private equity, Security (finance), Market liquidity, Privately held company, Accounting, Debt, Tax deduction, Fair market value, Debt restructuring, Buyout, American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Exchanging distressed debt for new debt: US tax consequences to debtors and creditors
    2009-04-22

    Debt-for-debt exchanges are not new, but are worth revisiting given the current economic climate. Furthermore, the recently enacted "Stimulus Act"1 provides some temporary relief to debtors from potentially harsh tax consequences of restructuring. The following discussion is relevant to issuers (also referred to as debtors) or holders (also referred to as creditors) of debt who are "US persons" (as defined in the US Internal Revenue Code).2

    In order to illustrate some of the key US federal income tax consequences of a debt-for-debt exchange, consider the following example:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, White & Case, Public company, Debtor, Security (finance), Interest, Debt, Economy, Maturity (finance), Tax deduction, Fair market value, Distressed securities, Bankruptcy discharge, Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    IRS offers blueprint for claiming stock losses as deductions
    2010-02-23

    A newly released IRS letter ruling (PLR 201006003, Oct. 28, 2009) provides guidance on how a consolidated return group may obtain an ordinary loss deduction in liquidating an insolvent subsidiary. Although a write-off of worthless stock generally produces a capital loss deduction, Code Section 165(g)(3) converts these losses to ordinary deductions when they arise from a write-off of stock of an affiliated corporation.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Ballard Spahr LLP, Royalty payment, Security (finance), Dividends, Interest, Taxable income, Economy, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Holding company, Subsidiary, Write-off, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Wayne R. Strasbaugh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ballard Spahr LLP
    The Restructuring Industry in the Trump Era - Key Policy Shifts to Watch
    2017-04-24

    After nearly 100 days in office, the Trump Administration and Republicans in Congress appear poised to have a significant impact on the restructuring industry. Although it is too early to tell exactly what the future holds in the Trump Era – even the so-called “Trump Bump” in the stock market appears to be pulling back – events taking place in Washington warrant close attention.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Squire Patton Boggs, Budget, Tax deduction, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA), US Congress
    Authors:
    Matthew D. Cutts
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Current page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days