Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Comments on the Supreme Court of Canada’s landmark insolvency decision in Ted LeRoy Trucking
    2011-05-20

    The Supreme Court of Canada decision in Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), which arose from the restructuring proceedings of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd. and was released on December 6, 2010, is a landmark decision in Canadian insolvency law.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Statutory interpretation, Debt, Liquidation, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran , Heather L. Meredith
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Section 11.01 of the CCAA: equipment lessors beware
    2011-05-05

    INTRODUCTION

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, McLennan Ross LLP, Option (finance), Consideration, Supreme Court of the United States, British Columbia Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Clayton D. Bangsund
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McLennan Ross LLP
    Supreme Court rules that GST debt is unsecured under CCAA
    2011-02-02

    The Supreme Court of Canada recently ruled in the Century Servicesi case that Goods and Services Tax (“GST”) deemed trusts under the federal Excise Tax Act (“ETA”) are ineffective in proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Excise, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Larry Ellis
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Super-priorities: update regarding"wages" under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act
    2010-12-21

    In May of 2010, we reported on the decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Ted Leroy Trucking v. Century Services Inc. In that decision, the Court of Appeal upheld a decision of the B.C.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Remand (court procedure), Secured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Simon Wormwell
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    SCC confirms no crown priority for unremitted GST/QST in a bankruptcy
    2009-12-10

    On October 30, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Quebec (Revenue) v. Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny. At issue in this case (and two companion cases) was the legal characterization of Crown rights with respect to collected but unremitted GST and Quebec sales tax (QST) in the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Crown is an ordinary unsecured creditor with respect to such amounts, subject to the rights of prior ranking security holders.

    Summary of Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, Excise, Tax deduction, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Quebec Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Barry N. Segal , Virginie Gauthier
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    The monitor’s power and authority in a CCAA claims process
    2009-07-23

    Although the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) provides scant guidance, it is a well established procedure in a CCAA proceeding for the Court to order a claims process and to delegate powers to review creditors claims to a CCAA Monitor. Recognizing the gaps in the legislation, the Nova Scotia Supreme Court recently reviewed and clarified the basis of a Monitor’s authority to conduct a claims bar process in the CCAA restructuring of ScoZinc Ltd.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Nova Scotia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Unsecured debt, Interest, Stakeholder (corporate), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    David Ward
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Good news for secured creditors as value of their collateral increases
    2008-11-05

    For most lenders, taking security from their borrowers is pretty straightforward: take a general security agreement covering inventory, receivables and all other collateral, add some guarantees, and then look to see if there are any other loose ends that need tying up. But for businesses in regulated industries where some sort of government-issued licence is a threshold requirement, it's not that easy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Accounts receivable, Personal property, Common law, Royal Bank of Canada, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    The fourth-time bankrupt
    2008-06-03

    Fourth-time personal bankruptcies come along so rarely that they deserve special recognition. The Supreme Court of British Columbia was recently presented with one such instance when Mr. Thomas Boivin ("Boivin") applied for a discharge from his fourth bankruptcy.

    Over the course of about thirty years, Boivin's use of credit left creditors with total debts of approximately $834,000.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Credit card, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Eminent domain, Line of credit, Bankruptcy discharge, Canada Revenue Agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court, British Columbia Supreme Court
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Court appoints equitable receiver in the absence of security
    2008-07-31

    In Warren v. Warren the British Columbia Supreme Court recently appointed an equitable receiver over the assets of a judgment to debtor, notwithstanding that the Plaintiff did not have any security.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Legal personality, Shareholder, Debtor, Debt, Subpoena, Line of credit, Capital punishment, Supreme Court of the United States, British Columbia Supreme Court, Court of equity
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Judicial circumvention of contractual rights in a plan of arrangement
    2007-09-04

    Courts will only rarely and sparingly interfere with contractual rights that parties freely negotiate and agree upon.

    However, in Protiva Biotherapeutics Inc. v. Inex Pharmaceuticals Corp., the British Columbia Court of Appeal recently determined that it could adjust contractual rights in order to achieve a workable plan of arrangement proposed by a company under the British Columbia Business Corporations Act (“Act”).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, Confidentiality, Injunction, Consent, Stakeholder (corporate), Prejudice, Anti-circumvention, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Supreme Court of the United States
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Page 41
    • Page 42
    • Current page 43
    • Page 44
    • Page 45
    • Page 46
    • Page 47
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days