This article has been contributed to the blog by Joshua Hurwitz and Waleed Malik.
Briere Sound Ltd. v. Briere, 2014 BCSC 417 (CanLII), decided March 17, 2014
Shareholders often overlook the need to properly document loan advances in their haste to provide funds to the company, without being aware of the significant consequences that can result.
Indemnification clauses are often considered a critical component of risk mitigation strategies in legal relationships. However, as is well understood, the value of an indemnification clause, in the event it becomes applicable, is dependent on the underlying financial viability of the entity granting the indemnity.
In Re Sino-Forest Corporation1, the Ontario Court of Appeal upheld the interpretation of “equity claims” employed by Justice Morawetz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List).
On 27 July 2012, Justice Morawetz of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) released reasons for decision in the Sino-Forest CCAA case concerning the scope and effect of the 2009 amendments to the CCAA that subordinate “equity claims” to all other claims and provide that under a CCAA plan, no payment can be made in respect of equity claims until all other claims are paid in full.
On August 19, 2011, the Federal Minister of Finance released a significant package of proposed amendments to Canada’s income tax rules applicable to Canadian multinational corporations with foreign affiliates (the Proposals). The Proposals apply to most distributions from, and reorganizations of, foreign subsidiaries of Canadian corporations and contain new rules applicable to certain loans received from foreign subsidiaries that remain outstanding for at least two years, among other significant changes. In addition to certain important new measures, the Proposals replace numero
Although originating from equity, declared but unpaid dividends have historically been treated as debt claims by courts in proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA).1 Following the coming into force of the CCAA amendments in September 2009, a fresh look at the characterization of claims as debt or equity is being undertaken.
In Canada, as in the US, corporate debtors are permitted with court approval to obtain DIP financing on a super-priority basis. The Order typically provides protections as hard as a nutshell, including that pension claims cannot crack the shell of protection and are subordinated to the new DIP loan. A recent Canadian decision, however, held that certain pension claims could crack the nut wide open and should be paid ahead of a DIP loan. Re Indalex Limited, 2011 ONCA 265 (Apr. 7, 2011).