Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Petition rather than transfer date valuation of collateral appropriate in determining secured creditor's preference liability
    2008-04-22

    Valuation is a critical and indispensable part of the bankruptcy process. How collateral and other estate assets (and even creditor claims) are valued will determine a wide range of issues, from a secured creditor’s right to adequate protection, post-petition interest, or relief from the automatic stay to a proposed chapter 11 plan’s satisfaction of the “best interests” test or whether a “cram-down” plan can be confirmed despite the objections of dissenting creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Retail, Collateral (finance), Interest, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Secured creditor, Valuation (finance), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Application of the absolute priority rule to pre-chapter 11 plan settlements: in search of the meaning of “fair and equitable”
    2007-05-31

    “Give ups” by senior classes of creditors to achieve confirmation of a plan have become an increasingly common feature of the chapter 11 process, as stakeholders strive to avoid disputes that can prolong the bankruptcy case and drain estate assets by driving up administrative costs.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Consideration, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Motorola, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Debt purchaser’s credit bid limited post-Fisker
    2014-05-28

    In the March/April 2014 edition of the Business Restructuring Review, we discussed an important ruling from a Delaware bankruptcy court restricting a creditor’s right to credit bid an acquired claim in bankruptcy sale of the underlying collateral. In In re Fisker Automotive Holdings, Inc., 2014 BL 13998 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 17, 2014), leave to app. denied, 2014 BL 33749 (D. Del. Feb. 7, 2014), certification denied, 2014 BL 37766 (D. Del. Feb. 12, 2014), the bankruptcy court limited the amount of the credit bid to the discounted purchase price actually paid for the debt.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debt, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    No surcharge for you: Third Circuit rules that section 506(c) surcharge is "sharply limited"
    2014-01-31

    The ability to "surcharge" a secured creditor's collateral in bankruptcy is an important resource available to a bankruptcy trustee or chapter 11 debtor in possession ("DIP"), particularly in cases where there is little or no equity in the estate to pay administrative costs, such as the fees and expenses of estate-retained professionals. However, as demonstrated by a ruling handed down by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, the circumstances under which collateral may be surcharged are narrow. In In re Towne, Inc., 2013 BL 232068 (3d Cir. Aug.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Collateral (finance), Foreclosure, Secured creditor, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Secured creditor may choose to take no action during Chapter 11 case without hazarding lien stripping
    2013-09-30

    A long-standing legal principle is that liens pass through bankruptcy unaffected. Like every general rule, however, this tenet has exceptions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Foreclosure, Secured creditor, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Dan B. Prieto , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Section 506(a): why “wait-and-see” won’t work to value secured-creditor claims
    2012-08-01

    Section 506(a) of the Bankruptcy Code contemplates bifurcation of a debtor's obligation to a secured creditor into secured and unsecured claims, depending on the value of the collateral securing the debt. The term "value," however, is not defined in the Bankruptcy Code, and bankruptcy courts vary in their approaches to the meaning of the term. In In re Heritage Highgate, Inc., 679 F.3d 132 (3d Cir.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Fair market value, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Lauren M. Buonome , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    European perspective in brief
    2012-08-01

    Europe has struggled mightily during the last several years to triage a long series of critical blows to the economies of the 27 countries that comprise the European Union as well as the collective viability of eurozone economies. Here we provide a snapshot of some recent developments relating to insolvency and restructuring in the EU.

    Filed under:
    European Union, Italy, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Debtor, Liquidation, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    European Union, Italy, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    RadLAX: credit bidding is cleared for takeoff by U.S. Supreme Court
    2012-06-05

    The U.S. Supreme Court in RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, ___ S. Ct. ___, 2012 WL 1912197 (May 29, 2012), held that a debtor may not confirm a chapter 11 "cramdown" plan that provides for the sale of collateral free and clear of existing liens, but does not permit a secured creditor to credit-bid at the sale. The unanimous ruling written by Justice Scalia (with Justice Kennedy recused) resolved a split among the Third, Fifth, and Seventh Circuits.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Limited liability company, Secured creditor
    Authors:
    Kevyn D. Orr , Beth Heifetz , Dan T. Moss
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Credit bidding and the Supreme Court: what happens next?
    2012-03-08

    On December 12, 2011, the Supreme Court granted a petition for certiorari in a case raising the question of whether a debtor's chapter 11 plan is confirmable when it proposes an auction sale of a secured creditor's assets free and clear of liens without permitting that creditor to "credit bid" its claims but instead provides the creditor with the "indubitable equivalent" of its secured claim. RadLAX Gateway Hotel, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, No. 11-166 (cert. granted Dec. 12, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Credit (finance), Debtor, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Beth Heifetz , Kevyn D. Orr , Dan T. Moss
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Seventh Circuit rules that secured creditors must be given the right to credit-bid
    2011-10-13

    In a victory for secured creditors, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held inRiver Road Hotel Partners, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank (In re River Road Hotel Partners, LLC), 2011 WL 2547615 (7th Cir. June 28, 2011), that a dissenting class of secured lenders cannot be deprived of the right to credit-bid its claims under a chapter 11 plan that proposes an auction sale of the lenders’ collateral free and clear of liens.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Federal Reporter, Limited liability company, Option (finance), Dissenting opinion, Secured creditor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    George R. Howard , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 57
    • Page 58
    • Page 59
    • Page 60
    • Current page 61
    • Page 62
    • Page 63
    • Page 64
    • Page 65
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days