In this edition of the Landlord’s Corner, we review various cases that address the (i) rights of landlords to recover their property post-rejection, (ii) whether payments pursuant to a termination of lease agreement constitute preferential transfers and (iii) whether a lease could be retroactively rejected in the absence of a formal motion to reject.
IUE-CWA v Visteon Corporation, 2010 WL 2735715 (3rd Cir July 13, 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
American Consolidated Transportation Companies, Inc v RBS Citizens NA (In re American Consolidated Transportation Companies, Inc), Adversary No 10-00154, Bankruptcy No 09-26062 (Bankr ND Ill July 13, 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In re EDM Corporation, 2010 WL 1929772 (8th Cir BAP May 14, 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In re 15375 Memorial Corporation, et al, 430 BR 142 (Bankr D Del May 17, 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court"), recently in In re Leslie Controls, Inc., Bankr. D. Del., Case No. 10-12199, expounded on whether attorney-client and attorney work-product privileged documents remained protected from discovery under the common interest doctrine. The common interest doctrine permits counsel representing different clients with similar legal interests to share information without having to disclose that information to others.
Parks v. Dittmar (In re Dittmar), 618 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In re SJT Ventures, LLC, 2010 WL 3342206 (Bankr. N.D. Texas 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Tucker, No. 09-5867 (6th Cir. 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT
In resolving a conflict within the Sixth Circuit, the Court of Appeals has held that chapter 13 debtors who propose in their plan of reorganization to cure the arrearage on their mortgage loan are required to pay all fees and costs required by the mortgage and non-bankruptcy law, even if the mortgage lender is undersecured. Put another way, mortgage lenders may include such fees and costs in their proofs of claim.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Paloian v LaSalle Bank, NA, 619 F.3d 688 (7th Cir. 2010)
CASE SNAPSHOT