Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    UK Special Administration Regime
    2011-11-03

    The UK Financial Services Authority (“FSA”) confirmed on 31 Oct. 2011 that MF Global UK Limited (“MF Global UK”) will be subject to the new Special Administration Regime (“SAR”).[1] This is the first time that the new regime, set out in The Investment Bank Special Administration Regulations 2011 (“SAR Regulations”)[2] has been invoked.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Futures contract, Investment banking, Best practice, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Pro rata, Banking Act 2009 (UK), HM Treasury (UK), International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, FSA, Bank of England
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Zais Investment Grade Limited VII — CDO noteholders take advantage of Chapter 11
    2011-10-03

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey recently held that a Cayman Islands collateralized-debt obligation issuer (“CDO”) could be a debtor under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and declined to dismiss an involuntary case commenced against the CDO by certain noteholders on the grounds that the notes held by such noteholders were “non-recourse” notes. Below is a discussion of the court’s decision and its potential implications. The decision is currently being appealed.

    Filed under:
    Cayman Islands, USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Asset-backed security, Liquidation, Default (finance), Collateralized debt obligation, Mortgage-backed security, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of New Jersey
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Daniel V. Oshinsky , Craig Stein
    Location:
    Cayman Islands, USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit rules against net winners in Madoff “net equity” dispute
    2011-08-18

    In a decision likely to affect thousands of Madoff investors, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 16, 2011 unanimously upheld the method used by the liquidating trustee for Bernard L.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Security (finance), Fraud, Standard of review, Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Investment funds, Market value, Pro rata, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Trustee
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    U.K. Appeals Court expands scope of client money pool and universe of clients eligible for client money pool distributions
    2010-08-10

    The U.K. Court of Appeal (the “Court of Appeal”) on Aug. 2, 2010, handed down a long-awaited decision regarding an appeal related to the scope of, and eligibility to receive distributions from, the Lehman Brothers Europe (International) (“LBIE”) pool of client money. Lehman Bros. Int. (Europe) (In Administration) v CRC Credit Fund Ltd. & Ors, [2010] EWCA Civ 917 (appeal taken from the Chancery Division) (U.K.).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Dividends, Investment company, Pro rata, Lehman Brothers, FSA, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Ron Feldman
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Claim resolution agreement, segregated assets, U.K. high court rulings
    2009-12-17

    As previously described in our Alert of Oct.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Share (finance), Conflict of laws, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liquidation, Election, Pro rata, Lehman Brothers, High Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Ron Feldman
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    LBIE Joint Administrators summarize potential scheme of arrangement
    2009-07-17

    On July 14, 2009, the Joint Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) ("LBIE"), made an application to the High Court in London with respect to a Scheme of Arrangement (the "Scheme") (the UK administration’s analogue to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization) designed to provide procedures to be used by LBIE for the purpose of returning so-called “trust property” held by LBIE to certain of its customers (“Creditors”). Among the primary purposes of the Scheme is the desire to avoid the need for a case-by-case resolution of the claims made by LBIE's Creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Unsecured debt, Liability (financial accounting), Dispute resolution, Fair market value, Valuation (finance), Pro rata, Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Decision in DBSI Inc., reminds us that district courts have personal jurisdiction throughout the United States
    2011-08-08

    Summary

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Federal Reporter, Personal jurisdiction, Debt, Pro rata, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Service issues letter ruling on application of Section 382(l)(5) for a consolidated group which filed for bankruptcy protection under Title 11
    2011-04-10

    In PLR 201051019 (12/23/2010), the Service ruled that in computing a consolidated group’s §382 limitation after filing for bankruptcy relief, all of its outstanding liabilities before the ownership change should be taken into account at the adjusted issue price, regardless of whether the obligations were subsequently discharged in whole or in part during the recognition period.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Taxable income, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Holding company, Subsidiary, Preferred stock, Pro rata, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Service attempts to help tenancy-in-common investors exchanging like-kind property under section 1031 in workouts
    2011-03-16

    Now we can add Program Manager’s Technical Advice or “PMTA” to the list of administrative projects on tax matters that are open to FOIA and review by the tax practitioner community. One area that needs some help are investors in tenancy-in-common programs. On May 15, 2010, the Service issue PMTA 2010-05 which provides an legal analysis from Chief Counsel’s office directed to IRS program managers in the field.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Leasehold estate, Debt, Attorney's fee, Pro rata, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Jerald David August
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Xerium Technologies files bankruptcy, hoping to cut its debt by $160 million
    2010-04-05

    Equipment maker, Xerium Technologies, filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy on March 30th in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Share (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debt, Pro rata, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, Chief executive officer
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Current page 8
    • Page 9
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days