Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    A DIP departure
    2012-07-30

    In Ontario, a debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) lender is usually granted a charge by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) (the “Court”) over the assets of the debtor which is under the protection of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (the “CCAA”) to secure the repayment of the DIP loan.  The priority of the charge is set out in the order granting the charge.  Most such orders provide that prior to exercising its rights and remedies against the debtor after an event of default, the DIP lender must appl

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Ontario, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Debtor
    Authors:
    Andrea Lockhart , Steven Golick
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Third party benefit providers get super priority secured claim for unpaid remittances owed by employer
    2012-06-18

    Synopsis

    In the latest decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court (the “Court”) regarding the bankruptcy of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd. (“TLT”), the Court found that unpaid remittances owed by TLT to third party benefit providers constituted “wages” within the meaning of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA). This entitled the benefit providers to super priority secured status in the bankruptcy of TLT.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Secured creditor, British Columbia Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Steven Golick , Patrick Riesterer
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Quick flip a flop: application for court appointed receiver and order for quick flip asset sale denied
    2012-06-18

    The Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) recently declined to grant a receivership order under section 243 of the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (“BIA”) and s. 101 of the Courts of Justice Act (Ontario) (“CJA”) or to approve a proposed  “quick flip” transaction among related companies on the basis of an insufficient evidentiary record. Insolvency practitioners should take note of this case, 9-Ball Interests Inc. v.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Debtor, Secured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Andrea Lockhart , Steven Golick
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Canadian court permits roll-up of pre-petition borrowing in cross-border Canada-U.S. proceeding
    2012-04-25

    Interim Financing Under the CCAA and “Roll-ups”

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Collateral (finance)
    Authors:
    Steven Golick , Patrick Riesterer
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Québec court: DIP lender has priority over pension plan deficit
    2012-05-21

    In April 2011, the Ontario Court of Appeal rendered a unanimous judgment in Re Indalex Limited which ordered that the amount the debtor was required to contribute towards its pension plan wind up deficiency be paid in higher priority to repayments to its DIP lender. This judgment was a surprise to the legal community. Leave to appeal has since been granted by the Supreme Court of Canada. In November 2011, groups of White Birch employees and retirees (referred to below as employees) filed motions seeking the application of the legal findings of Indalex to White Birch.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Debtor, Liquidation, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Martin Desrosiers , Sandra Abitan , Julien Morissette
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Stepping into the employees’ shoes: third party benefit providers entitled to super priority secured claim for unpaid remittances owed by employer
    2012-06-05

    In the latest decision of the British Columbia Supreme Court (the “Court”) regarding the bankruptcy of Ted LeRoy Trucking Ltd.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, British Columbia Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Steven Golick , Patrick Riesterer
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    BIA and CCAA "lookback periods" for preferential transactions
    2012-02-10

    Lenders should be cognizant that the granting of security by a debtor may be subject to challenge as a fraudulent preference in the event the debtor subsequently files for liquidation or proposal proceedings under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (Canada) (the “BIA”) or restructuring proceedings under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (Canada) (the “CCAA”). Such risk arises if the debtor is insolvent the time the security was granted.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Debtor, Legal burden of proof, Prima facie, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Richard Borins , Andrea Lockhart
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Alberta Court confirms new rights for trustees of a bankrupt franchisee
    2011-10-14

    Summary

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Bankruptcy, Retail, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Consent, Concession (contract), Franchise agreement, Prejudice, Ford Motor Company, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Colin Feasby , Tamara Prince , Michael Bokhaut
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Significant proposals to amend Canada’s foreign affiliate tax rules
    2011-08-22

    On August 19, 2011, the Federal Minister of Finance released a significant package of proposed amendments to Canada’s income tax rules applicable to Canadian multinational corporations with foreign affiliates (the Proposals).  The Proposals apply to most distributions from, and reorganizations of, foreign subsidiaries of Canadian corporations and contain new rules applicable to certain loans received from foreign subsidiaries that remain outstanding for at least two years, among other significant changes.  In addition to certain important new measures, the Proposals replace numero

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Share (finance), Tax exemption, Shareholder, Dividends, Foreign exchange market, Income tax, Liquidation, Tax deduction, Subsidiary, Federal Ministry of Finance (Germany), Department of Finance Canada, Constitutional amendment
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP
    Minimizing risk for creditors' nominee directors
    2011-07-26

    A nominee director of a corporation appointed by one of its creditors may encounter risk of liability where that creditor is engaged with the corporation in efforts to restructure its debt. Steps can be taken to minimize the risk of such liability.

    Nominee Directors in Canada

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, Conflict of interest, Share (finance), Confidentiality, Debtor, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Interest, Debt, Non-disclosure agreement, Debt restructuring
    Authors:
    Richard Borins
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days