Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Can the Court evaluate the feasibility of a concordato preventivo plan whereby the debtor would continue to trade?
    2016-12-20

    The Court of Pavia (14 October 2016) denies confirmation of a concordato preventivo plan and proposal approved by the creditors, based on the opinion of the Judicial Commissioner that the plan is clearly unsuitable to cure the debtor’s state of financial and economic distress

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Termination of concordato preventivo when the breach is not a fault of the debtor?
    2016-12-20

    The Court of Milan (29 September 2016) confirmed that the concordato preventivocan be terminated as a consequence of the mere fact that a “material” breach occurred, as provided by Art. 186 of the Italian Bankruptcy Law.

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Investment funds are eligible for debt restructuring agreements and then also for concordato preventivo?
    2016-12-20

    The Court of Milan (10 November 2016) issued a confirmation order of a debt restructuring agreement pursuant to Art. 182-bis of the Italian Bankruptcy Law on a petition by an investment fund, which was deemed as a legal entity on its own right and not only a separate estate within the SGR which is the legal representative of the fund

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Il concordato può essere risolto anche se l’inadempimento non è imputabile al debitore?
    2016-12-21

    Il Tribunale di Milano (29 settembre 2016) conferma l’interpretazione secondo cui il concordato deve essere risolto in conseguenza del solo fatto oggettivo dell’inadempimento che non sia di “scarsa importanza” ai sensi del secondo comma dell’art. 186 l.f.

    Il caso

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    The effects of bankruptcy declaration date back to the concordato filing also if there is a gap between the two procedures
    2016-05-31

    The Court of Cassation (29 March 2016, No. 6045) ruled that the look-­back period for claw-­back actionsstarts from the concordato filing, when bankruptcy was declared after a period of time, provided thatboth procedures refer to the same insolvency situation

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Collection of debtor’s receivables and set-off security rights of the bank can be stayed after concordato pre-filing, but the debtor is not in control of amounts cashed
    2016-05-31

    The Court of Bolzano (5 April 2016) confirms that revolving credit facility agreements providing forancillary set-off and collection terms in favour of the bank can be suspended, but the bank is protectedbecause the amounts collected are controlled by the Judicial Commissioner

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Debtor, Accounts receivable
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Still unsettled the issue of delayed payment of secured creditors in concordato preventivo ?
    2016-05-31

    The Court of Modena (8 February 2016) challenged precedents of the Court of Cassation ruling thatdelayed payment of secured creditors is allowed only if the timing would not be shorter in bankruptcyliquidation

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Guarantees on debtor’s assets under a restructuring plan are subject to claw-back, the Court of Cassation rules
    2016-07-28

    The Italian Supreme Court (5 July 2016, No. 13719) issues a maiden decision on the conditions for theprotection afforded by restructuring plan to stand if the plan fails and bankruptcy is declared

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale, Italian Supreme Court of Cassation
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    Floating charge and foreclosure agreement under Italian Law
    2016-05-13

    Background

    On 26 April 2016, the Italian Government has introduced a new reform to shorten the length of the recovery of credit, by approving the decree law no. 59 (the Decree), entered into force on 3 May 2016. The Decree  aims  at  fostering  and facilitating  the  recovery  of  credit throughout enforcement  and insolvency  proceedings.

    The main innovations concern:

    Filed under:
    Italy, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Nctm Studio Legale, Debtor
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale
    The “Borsalino” concordato and the “going concern” rules
    2016-02-29

    The Court of Alessandria (18 January 2016) addressed a series of issues regarding various rules meant to allow preserving the business in the concordato preventivo procedure, sell the business through competitive bids, lease the business prior to the application to commence the procedure, "mixed" concordato schemes and objections which key continuing suppliers can raise for past debts

    The case

    Filed under:
    Italy, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nctm Studio Legale
    Authors:
    Fabio Marelli
    Location:
    Italy
    Firm:
    Nctm Studio Legale

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days