Recently, the Supreme Court, in the case of Gaurav Agarwal vs CA Devang P. Sampat, has issued notice to the parties for adjudicating the crucial question of law pertaining to the ‘Period of Limitation’ for preferring an appeal under Section 61 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“theCode”).
While the inclusion of interest amounts in ‘financial debt’, for the purposes of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (‘IBC’), is clearly provided for in the IBC, the interest component in the case of operational debt has always been a point of contention.
April, 2023 For Private Circulation - Educational & Informational Purpose Only A BRIEFING ON LEGAL MATTERS OF CURRENT INTEREST KEY HIGHLIGHTS ⁎ Bombay High Court: Arbitration clause can be invoked by assignee of rights under contract. * NCLT: Dissenting secured creditor cannot be treated higher than other creditors under Section 53 of the IBC just because they enjoy security interest. * Bombay High Court: “One-ness of interest”- the touch-stone for defendant to be transposed as plaintiff in case of part abandonment of suit claim. April, 2023 http://www.vaishlaw.com/ I.
A two-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) in its recent judgment Abhishek Singh v. Huhtamaki PPL Ltd.
Introduction
Facts:
Introduction
The case of Uniworld Sugars Limited (the Corporate Debtor) has a long and chequered history which started before the Allahabad Bench of the NCLT and after doing a round before the NCLAT and the Supreme Court, has been finally decided by the Chandigarh Bench of NCLT vide an Order dated March 20, 2023.
There has always been a matter of contention for a Committee of Creditors, Resolution Professionals, legal fraternity during Corporate Resolution Insolvency Process (CIRP), whether the dues of the Government like Income-Tax, Sales Tax, Value Added Tax etc. are secured debt and whether the Government is a secured creditor.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal has answered this question in affirmative in its recent𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗱𝗮𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝟳𝘁𝗵 𝗙𝗲𝗯., 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟯 𝗶𝗻 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗔𝗽𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗹 (𝗔𝗧) (𝗜𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗰𝘆) 𝗡𝗼. 𝟮𝟰𝟮 𝗼𝗳 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟮 (𝗣𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗮𝗹 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗧𝗮𝘅 & 𝗔𝗻𝗿. 𝘃𝘀. 𝗔𝘀𝘀𝗮𝗺 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗮𝗻𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗮 𝗟𝘁𝗱).
On July 12, 2022, the Supreme Court of India (“Supreme Court”) passed a judgment in Vidarbha Industries Power Limited v. Axis Bank Limited[1] (“Vidarbha”), which considered the question whether Section 7(5)(a) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”), is mandatory or discretionary in nature.